Neofederalist, America First Nationalist. The Official Personal Account For @SamParkerSenate

Tomorrow
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event. Do they not realize how this looks? >TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president >TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard >UVU resisted, saying it was too risky >TPUSA insisted >TPUSA refused medical & emergency services >TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk >TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD >TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event >TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing >TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital >TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard >TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
202
1,208
6,462
1,328,860
What did UVU mean by this?
19
45
345
8,901
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Who told SAC Robert Bohls of the FBI that he'd be in charge of the investigation when Governor Cox had already told Beau Mason that Mason would be in charge? @RealCandaceO Why didn't the investigators tell us that detail? And remember, Bohls was brand new in the job only a couple weeks previous
1
36
161
5,629
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
THIS IS OVERWHELMING AND VERY DAMNING!
Too much yankin' & bankin' must have made @DrFrankTurek & Brian Harpole forget that the fire department performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital. How could they have missed this detail in all eleventy-three versions of their stories?
2
19
1,611
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Turning Point basically set the stage to ensure that Charlie Kirk's last day on Earth would be September 10th, 2025.
30
315
3,749
61,073
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Replying to @RealCandaceO
Who told Maycee Crofts to initiate the event? And why has she locked her Twitter account?
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event. Do they not realize how this looks? >TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president >TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard >UVU resisted, saying it was too risky >TPUSA insisted >TPUSA refused medical & emergency services >TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk >TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD >TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event >TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing >TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital >TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard >TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
10
55
420
7,371
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
186
1,029
3,829
313,489
2/ It gets worse
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event. Do they not realize how this looks? >TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president >TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard >UVU resisted, saying it was too risky >TPUSA insisted >TPUSA refused medical & emergency services >TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk >TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD >TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event >TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing >TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital >TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard >TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
4
37
239
8,490
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
I need people to eat serious humble pie. From @paramounttactcl to Andrew Wilson's @paleochristcon wife plus more who tried to tell me, the trained medical professional, that CPR wasn't necessary. You people are sick for defending the people who denied Charlie Kirk life saving care in the last moments of his life. ALLEGEDLY
Too much yankin' & bankin' must have made @DrFrankTurek & Brian Harpole forget that the fire department performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital. How could they have missed this detail in all eleventy-three versions of their stories?
16
47
366
9,765
Too much yankin' & bankin' must have made @DrFrankTurek & Brian Harpole forget that the fire department performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital. How could they have missed this detail in all eleventy-three versions of their stories?
68
406
2,971
58,786
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
It had to be in the courtyard, that part of the operation was non negotiable.
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
3
22
1,522
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
186
1,029
3,829
313,489
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
It鈥檚 almost as if Charlie鈥檚 security knew he was supposed to die that day or something. Security looks like it was intentionally ignored for the purposes of placing a patsy on the roof.
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
15
108
589
11,729
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Before this was the, we don't know know, but we know. Now it's the, we know. @RealCandaceO
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
2
11
1,290
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
CHARLIE'S SECURITY FAILED HIM ON 9/10 @ UVU CLEAR BREAKDOWN THE SECURITY REVIEW @BasedSamParker
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
2
4
21
1,556
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Replying to @RealCandaceO
TPUSA tanked Charlie!
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO 鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU 鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND 鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH 鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG 鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE 鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: 鈻笍lines of sight; 鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops; 鈻笍building access; 鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; 鈻笍communications; 鈻笍staffing; 鈻笍emergency response; 鈻笍medical contingencies; 鈻笍emergency egress; 鈻笍post assignments; and 鈻笍who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
2
51
363
20,154
"Not one person, not one human being has come forward and said 'I was with Erika.'" - @Whatthefekete Body language expert Christine Fekete points out various Erika Kirk contradictions and alibi weaknesses.
35
242
1,629
29,376
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
CORRECTION ON PARKING GARAGE DODGE? Upon further analysis of the parking garage Dodge alleged to be Tyler Robinson's, the rear exhaust DOES seem to match Tyler's Dodge Challenger. However, the front ends still might not match. Watch this and tell me if these cars match or not.
馃毃"TYLER'S CARS" DON'T MATCH They said that's Tyler's car in the parking garage but it's clearly not the same car! Look at the exhaust pipes! Dual vs. Quad! @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @jimmy_dore
121
110
661
120,497