No gun at the tunnel. No gun on the roof. There is no gun. The Emperor has no clothes.

MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO ▪️TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU ▪️TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ▪️TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND ▪️TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH ▪️TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG ▪️BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE ▪️TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3—only one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: ▪️lines of sight; ▪️elevated positions and rooftops; ▪️building access; ▪️Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; ▪️communications; ▪️staffing; ▪️emergency response; ▪️medical contingencies; ▪️emergency egress; ▪️post assignments; and ▪️who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.

Remember the Maine! Lol. We're a joke

Meet E̶r̶i̶k̶a̶ Elizabeth Lane Frantzve" 👀

1/ "America isn’t and wasn’t ever intended to be a 'White country.'" -@KimIversenShow Kim, how can you still claim things like this in 2026? A brief review of history proves you're wrong. TIMELINE ▪️Nearly 100% of America's Founders were White men. They explicitly left the Constitution "to ourselves and our posterity." Look up that 'posterity.' It means "direct offspring or descendants." That means America and the Constitution were intended for, and bequeathed to, White people. ▪️The 1790 Naturalization Act of the First Congress established that only free White people could become citizens. (Reaffirmed by the 1795 & 1798 Acts as well). That's right: the very first US Congress that gave us the 1st Amendment also gave us an explicitly White country. You don't deny the 1st Amendment do you, Kim? And if not, then why do you deny that First Act of Congress? (see source below) ▪️This ethnic exclusivity was explicitly enforced with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which banned Chinese from even entering the country. ▪️The Asiatic Barred Zone Immigration Act of 1917 banned immigration from a large, geographically defined region covering much of Asia and the Pacific (including India, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East). ▪️In Ozawa v. United States (1922), citing the 1790 Act, SCOTUS ruled Japanese can't become naturalized citizens, because they're not White. ▪️In United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923), also citing the 1790 act, SCOTUS ruled Indians can't become naturalized citizens because they're not White. (see source below) ▪️The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act of 1924 established the National Origins quota system that restricted immigration to mostly Western Europe (UK, Germany & Ireland), but allowed for limited immigration from Scandinavia, and Southern & Eastern Europe. IOW, nothing but White people. ▪️The McCarran-Walter Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 reinforced & preserved the National Origins quotas. ▪️Even when the Hart-Celler Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 removed the quota system & Europe-only restrictions, Americans were ASSURED that the ethnic makeup of America (then overwhelmingly White), would NOT be affected (see source below). IOW, they implicitly admitted & acknowledged that America was a White country & would remain so. Even so, Americans were still opposed to opening America's borders 2.4-to-1 (see source below). Congress acted in direct opposition to the will of the vast majority Americans. At no point in history was America ever intended to be anything but a Nation of White people, for White people—until after international, globalist multiculturalism was imposed on us against our will and under false pretenses. EXCEPTIONS Q: "Well, what about the Black people and American Indians?" A: They were given special one-time exceptions since they were here and there was 'no getting rid of them', so to speak. The Black population was granted citizenship after the Civil War, and the American Indians were made citizens in 1924. These actions weren't an acknowledgement that America wasn't intended to be a White country, they were practical considerations. OBJECTIONS You might dislike all that. You might hate our history. You might dismiss it all as racist. You might think this multicultural paradigm disingenuously imposed on us was the right move by our leaders. Fine. But what you can't do is credibly or truthfully claim that "America isn’t and wasn’t ever intended to be a 'White country.'" That's revisionist history. In a word, it's a lie. The only one who has fallen victim to an 'online narrative' here is you. You might say, "Well, this is what America wants now. It's our national will now." But that change in national will has come since we've been overrun by non-White foreigners. So of course the "will of America" has changed. But actual Americans, heritage Americans, birthright Americans—they didn't choose this. Foreigners who were recently granted citizenship (under false pretenses) have chosen this. IMPLICATIONS I can't get inside your head to know whether you are intentionally lying, are confused, or are simply ignorant about this. But if it's ignorance, there's really no excuse anymore. You have the most powerful search & research tool in the history of mankind in the palm of your hand. If it's confusion, I'm hoping the above helped clear it up. If not, I'm happy to discuss this with you further. And if you're still skeptical, then consider this simple thought experiment: If we could snap our fingers & instantly erase all White Americans and replace them with brown foreigners from India, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, Africa, Mexico and the Middle East, would it still be America? Conversely, if we could snap our fingers & instantly remove all non-White Americans, would it still basically be America? If you're intellectually honest, there's only one answer to that. Best wishes and happy Sunday. (Attached: a few sources to get you started)

These are the people telling me that Islam & sharia law aren't American or compatible with Western Civilization. But is this Western Civilization? Is this "American?" 🤢🤮😡

RT @BasedSamParker: Kapparot is absolutely enraging & disgusting. Even more so when you realize they think this absolves them of gen*cide,…

BREAKING: Ed Sheeran has secured Mike Huckabee to replace Macklemore as his opening act.

The gun allegedly stuffed down Tyler Robinson's pants can't be seen in 4k or 8k resolution, only 7k. (Note: gun outline not to scale, but it doesn't matter in 7k)

I've obtained leaked footage of the Charlie Kirk statue vandalization at TPUSA HQ in full 7k resolution. And you're never going to believe who it was. @RealCandaceO

NEW FOOTAGE: NO GUN Will the sloppers kindly show me a single frame where a Mauser 98 is visible? And why is Tyler's head & face cut off when the camera easily captured it? H/t: @RealCandaceO @DiligentDenizen

CHARLIE KIRK'S FUTURE: CENSORSHIP, THE IRAN WAR & THE PALANTIR PRE-CRIME CRYSTAL BALL Charlie Kirk wasn't just the first casualty of the latest installment of the Iran War, he was also one of the first victims of the "pre-crime" mass surveillance state. IOW, it wasn't just who he was and what he'd done to that point that got him ass*ssinated—it was also who he would plausibly BECOME and what he MIGHT do in certain anticipated, or predicted, futures. Stay with me now and examine all the supporting attachments to truly be able to see this entire picture and context that I'm laying out. Beginning with Charlie's call to 'ban the ADL' in September 2023, then expanding with his attacks on the ADL, SPLC & BLM (which he referred to as jewish organizations funding the open borders and quasi-Marxist policies ruining America) throughout the late summer/early fall of 2023, and finally accelerating after his conspiratorial framing of 10/7 israeli foreknowledge, Charlie Kirk began to be attacked first by the Left- & then by the Right-wing factions of organized jewry. As he gradually shifted into platforming more israel- and jewish-critical commentary & positions in 2025, they increased their pressure & attacks by subjecting him to their signature struggle sessions that dominated his entire summer of 2025. When the attacks bounced off him, and the struggle sessions failed to bring him in line, and he then determined to continue on without their money or their cause, they took final action. When Charlie declared in that group text that he was leaving the pro-israel cause, they already knew/suspected he might do that with a high degree of confidence. Not only was Charlie already being too problematic for their taste, but they had looked into the future and saw the strong possibility that he'd only grow into a much larger problem. They forecasted that he might grow: ▪️Increasingly opposed to not only another Iran war but also to other future military actions and wars they deem necessary to the survival of israel. Remember, the Iran War is about establishing Greater israel & its hegemony. It's not an end in and of itself. ▪️Increasingly opposed to the surveillance state (Charlie was outspoken in his criticism of the 702 abuses & spying on Americans) ▪️Increasingly opposed to censorship of Tiktok and other social media (Charlie was very vocal in his opposition to censorship of social media, especially Tiktok. And need I remind you they completed their hostile takeover of Tiktok just 6 days after their hostile takeover of TPUSA?) ▪️Increasingly opposed to the policies and actions of the zio-occupied Republican Party (need I remind you of what they just did to Charlie's favorite congressman Thomas Massie?). Charlie was more aligned with Massie than with the occupied GOP. ▪️Increasingly focused on Christian/American issues & priorities over jewish/israeli issues & priorities. According to Rabbi Wolicki (video below), Charlie hated having to talk about israel as much as he did. ▪️Increasingly aligned with anti-zionist and anti-semitic leaders & their factions: Tucker, Candace, Alex Jones and even Nick Fuentes and possibly the Tates (who are friends with everyone I just listed). Merely the prospect of a conservative, anti-zionist, America-First supercell on the Right would have been a catastrophe for jewish power and israel, both now and into the future. And such a super-cell would have plausibly been galvanized around a mutual opposition to the Iran & Ukraine wars. And what was Charlie's specialty? It was being the glue that holds coalitions together. Charlie was amazing at that. And that's the piece that many people are missing: it wasn't just what Charlie had already done & was then doing—it was also what they saw him doing in the *future* when they looked into their crystal ball. Or at least it was one possible future that had a high enough probability of happening that they felt compelled to intervene with extreme prejudice. It wasn't just what Charlie was now, it was who they saw him becoming. It wasn't just what he was doing now, it was what they saw him doing in the future. It wasn't just what he built now, it's what they saw him building in the future. That last one is really important. They saw that TPUSA, with 600k lifetime members & 250k current members, was about ~50/50 in its support for israel (which was bad enough as it was), and they realized it might grow into organization with 1 million+, the majority of which who would be neutral-to-negative on israel, and even harbor powerful Right-wing antisemitism against jewish power in general. They saw that TPUSA would staunchly oppose more wars for israel and more immigration for the open society diaspora. IOW, an organization that would grow in its opposition to Right- and Left- wing jewish agendas. It's actually pretty simple and logical from the jewish perspective. Charlie was at war with Left-wing/open-society jewish power. As he grew increasingly alienated with and antagonistic toward Right-wing/zionist jewish power, he was fast outgrowing his usefulness and became a liability in the eyes of many of them. And he was openly complaining about their bullying tactics (video below). So they hatched a plan, gave him a final chance to get in line, and then when he didn't accept, they took him out—while framing a lone-gunman patsy and scapegoating the radical (but anti-israel) Left. 2 enemies eliminated with one bang. Not only was Charlie the first casualty of the next Iran War already in planning, he was also the first major victim of the Project Stargate/Palantir Panopticon/Mass Surveillance State "pre-crime" enforcement system. They saw him becoming a bigger problem in the future. This isn't complicated math. Charlie was already perceived by many jews as a threat NOW. That's on record. Evidently, the threat that he might become an even bigger problem had a high enough probability to warrant action. Their decision was easy: pre-emption. They love their "pre-emptive" wars & actions, don't they? "Rise and kill first." ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF 'THE LEFT' Yes the radical Marxist Left is an enemy to America, but so is the zionist Right. And they're both led by the same Tribe. I don't make the rules. I just observe and notice. And so did Charlie. Sources below. Please watch video to end and carefully examine each meme.

In a bizarre segment of his speech yesterday, Frank Turek connected the ass*ssination of JFK, 9/11, the attempted ass*ssination of Trump, the ass*ssination of Charlie Kirk, and the expulsion of the first Christians from the synagogues. According to Frank, it's somehow all connected to knowing the truth about Christianity, but I noticed it's actually all connected to knowing the truth about a different tribe of people. Watch this and tell me what you think:

The reason "the Left" was framed for the Charlie Kirk assassination is basically 3-fold: 1. The Left is EXTREMELY anti-zionist, anti-israel & pro-Palestine. It sees israel as conducting a genocide. Destroying the Left dismantles most organized opposition to israel. 2. They needed to gain support from "the Right" for the mass-surveillance state/Project Stargate panopticon. Perhaps you've seen all the pro-israel & zio-adjacent influencers promoting Flock cameras & Palantir, etc? Perhaps you remember zio-jew Larry Ellison saying that Americans will need to learn to be on their best behavior? 3. Finally, they needed to pry apart the horseshoe union that was forming between the Left & Right over Epstein, AIPAC, ending foreign aid to israel, and opposition to war with Iran. Indeed, it was this horseshoe between Reps. Ro Khanna (Dem) and Massie (GOP) that forced the release of the Epstein files. And you saw the lengths they just went to to expel Thomas Massie. Of course, the Loony Left (predictably) took the bait (no doubt it had intelligence help) and celebrated Charlie's death. And much of the Right took the bait after seeing the reaction of the Looney Left and hearing many compromised, bought-off, or otherwise misguided influencers call for unity on the Right to crush the Left. The Left is an existential threat to both israel and America, so their enmity toward America was played up, but the real reason was due to its opposition to israel. That is why you don't really see anything being done about the Left's anti-American proclivities, only its anti-zionists action. The infiltrated neocon/zionist Right is also an existential threat to America and is bankrupting & gutting us as well. This is not difficult to comprehend. The looney left and the zionist right must both be destroyed. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. We needn't pick one over the other. Bonus: they're both controlled by jews.

Charlie Kirk, 1 year ago today:

NEW CHARLIE KIRK TIMELINE DEVELOPMENT: According to Frank Turek, after having a long Zoom call with the israelis to allegedly prep for his UVU appearance the next day, Charlie held another prep session after dinner! How much "prep" did Charlie need?! Was there something else going on in these meetings? What was the context in which Charlie sent those iMessages to Dan Flood & Andrew Kolvet expressing fear "they were going to k*ll him?" Why doesn't TPUSA release a full timeline and accounting of Charlie's last hours & actions? If they've done nothing wrong, there's nothing to hide, right?

TYLER ROBINSON AND THE MYSTERY OF THE TOWEL & FINGERPRINTS Why did Tyler Robinson have a towel with him? Did he always plan on leaving the rifle behind wrapped in a towel? Because the alleged text messages make it sound like a spontaneous decision on-the-fly to leave the rifle behind: "I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it," and "didn't have the time or ability to take it with." How's that? Why not? We're supposed to believe he had the ability to take the rifle onto campus, onto the roof, off of the roof and across the street into the woods—but not the rest of the way back to his car? Lol So coming back to the towel, the only reason he'd have a towel with him was if it was a premeditated part of his plan. Otherwise, we have to accept that he just happened to serendipitously have a large towel with him. What luck! As he was "changing outfits," he just happened to rummage through his backpack and stumbled upon a large towel. Lol No. If there was a towel, then it had to have been intended from the beginning. We're supposed to believe that his big plan was: "I'm going to do a Peter Pan off a 16-foot building that I've never practiced, and then flee along an intricate and well-planned escape path back to my car—but I'm going to leave the gun behind halfway through so that I'll have to risk coming back for it later when the place will surely be crawling with cops...because reasons." If his plan was to leave the gun behind and then circle back to go pick it up, then why didn't he circle back and go pick it up like he planned—only to then express regret at not going back to pick it up according to his plan? Are you seeing how stupid and incoherent this all is? But even if you accept that nonsensical story, you still have to explain why he was worried about leaving fingerprints behind on the gun when he simply could have wiped them off...like with the towel he intentionally brought with him! And actually, he could have used any piece of clothing to wipe his prints off the gun. Everybody in the world has watched movies and TV shows where people wipe their prints. Tyler was allegedly so worried about prints that he mentioned it TWICE in the text messages, but didn't wipe them off? He was so careful in his planning that he brought a towel to wrap the gun in to leave it behind, but he didn't think to use the towel to wipe the prints?! Lol People don't just stuff large towels in backpacks and they don't just spaz out about leaving prints behind when they can easily wipe them off. And they don't leave guns behind after they've gotten away. And 22-year old male electricians don't "change outfits." They might "change clothes" or "change pants," but not "outfits." Finally, Tyler allegedly tells Lance Twiggs to check the internet to see if they found the gun? Why couldn't Tyler check the internet himself? Tyler was allegedly monitoring the situation so closely that he already knew about George Zinn, but needed Lance Twiggs to find out about the rifle for him? So yes, I'm calling bullsh*t: obvious planted gun is obvious. Nothing about these messages makes any sense. And no, I will not accept 'Well, people just do things. Who knows why?' I won't be gaslit into believing this nonsense. The low-IQ position here is to unironically believe the incoherence in these retarded messages.

What if Ben said anything to Charlie on the phone?

Remember when the only person in the world getting real-time updates on Charlie Kirk's status in the SUV on the way to the hospital was Benocide Shapiro—and all the sloppers just pretended like this was completely normal?

2 tribal Leftist jews kvetch that Tucker Carlson, @RealCandaceO & @NickJFuentes are "tribalist Leftists" who are "anti-civilization" because they don't support israel. It's my favorite jewish combo: projection & inversion served with a side of hypocrisy and no self-awareness.