Bearmarket survivor | OverInvested | speaking on spaces | don't know wen to sell | doing different web3 stuff

on-chain
aDAMNonX retweeted
Replying to @beniaminmincu
9
2
28
2,398
Welcome to World Financial Computer 😂 41M $EGLD minted by 1 wallet you can see it here xoxno.com/profile/erd1kwvkch… Explorer "under maintenance" all validators called to stop
3
5
19
1,161
Full cycle achieved as an $EGLD holder Same question asked on $XMN and got banned This is the proof that @beniaminmincu used your money to fund his business that is not related to crypto Welcome to computer finance era 🤡
Replying to @beniaminmincu
how does that reflect back to elrond-erd-2:native? also this sounds like a new story that will never have an impact on the ecosystem, like all the previous ones share numbers, business partners, and answer the first question
16
3
31
3,865
If you an active @StellarOrg user or DeFi power user then you need to try out @XoxnoNetwork protocol
XOXNO Lending is live on Stellar in beta mode. @StellarOrg needs a money market that matches the network. We built one. A hub-and-spoke design: one pool, isolated hubs, configurable risk params per spoke.
1
2
16
815
GM from $P0 community
He who has the cheapest inference controls the world gm
1
457
Tek is tekking + bullish on dev mindset If you are using AI to build stuff you should definitely look into p0.systems/ if you are not devving, you can grab a bag and benefit of the upside $P0
said it before P0 is 1:1 ownership of P0, just like a stock after our expenses wuts left offer is given to holders as dividends (for us it’s LP/ bb) if. / when a seed round happens too funds will be used to buy P0 on market. i’ve told every single vc that reached out to me this alr
517
Put your money where your mouth is @beniaminmincu @lucianmincu
Asta daca mai plătesc ofc, au antecedente de a “uita” sa plătească hackathons/winners etc. Deja au trecut months de la finalizarea BON, pe lângă ca sunt niște săraci alocând $50k pentru minim 20 critical si peste 100 other issues while industry standard e 50k and even more per critical nu shared across all 😅
2
8
2,004
aDAMNonX retweeted
I still have 2 new models to drop and the big one im still finalizing it
15
8
66
4,760
if @blknoiz06 did it with solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump I was thinking we can revive MVX with $BOBER but then is there anyone left?
30
26
83
6,950
this is what you get (a game 😂) when you have nothing else to show & a noob in charge of mArKeTiNg & communication a network upgrade hyped for over 1 year & delayed, a missing CEO and other networks that already ship better tech together with partnerships, volumes, users, etc
Built with ❤️ on Supernova supernova-arcade.xyz
2
3
20
2,401
there you go @DBCrypt0 and @SasuRobert - now you can make millions
Want to get paid for FUD tweets? Now it's open to everyone. Paste your x URL, and the app estimates your earnings based on your Solana hate tweets' volume and quality.
2
252
why do resources are still allocated towards xLaunchpad / xSpotlight? LOL
Replying to @s_stanculeanu
5/ Misc - Shipped an xExchange release with multiple fixes - Pushed security and performance updates across xLaunchpad, xSpotlight and the Assets dApp - Migrated dApps and SDKs to sdk-dapp v5
3
7
1,431
Remember when @beniaminmincu met with Charles a while ago? 😂 maybe he learned a thing or two
8
557
aDAMNonX retweeted
We’re excited to @BuildOnStellar and enter the next stage of our growth🔥 @StellarOrg is building real momentum, from DTCC’s tokenization plans to @MoneyGram $MGUSD launch. But on-chain DeFi remains underserved. That’s where XOXNO will create real value: better UX, stronger lending infrastructure, and a new architecture for on-chain finance.
21
46
181
12,614
revolutionary post now explain how projects in the ecosystem that were forced to be listed in pair with $EGLD got rekt & their price was dragged down even if they paid ton of money & were listed on CEXs in pair with $ wen open space w the community? double standards much?
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were. The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin. As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself. We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own. Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
4
4
34
3,587
are you proud of yourself @lucianmincu @beniaminmincu @SasuRobert ? build and they will come / best tek / best stack it's worthless if you don't offer what comes along with it you live in your own bubble heads while everyone that lost money and TIME on this chain got rekt
Replying to @bnistordev
Another reason I stepped away is that I wanted to build. I wanted to code, develop, and create things. But I did not want to keep building inside an ecosystem where, after six months or a year of work, maybe making five euros is the only realistic outcome.
9
5
45
5,070
Oh no. "@BoberCTO gang is toxic" meanwhile 😂👇 happening exactly what we've said it will. this without even taking into consideration the dump on $HTM
Going to attract a lot of negativity for this one, but going to say it anyway. What happened to Soul Protocol from xLaunchpad? $EGLD #EGLd #MultiversX
3
2
11
1,506
Sergiu is leaving xPortal but nobody noticed / remember these 2 guys that now have in their bio "prev. Founder @xPortalApp" 😂 what was your contribution and on what terms did you leave? @bposytive @markoflux another successful story left in the air kek
Replying to @xPortalApp
3/ New era brings in new leadership. We're beyond excited to welcome @markoflux and @bposytive, @alphalink_xyz co-founders, as our new xPortal CPO and CTO. Their vision, passion, and unique expertise will steer xPortal into even smarter, brighter territories.
6
21
4,348
aDAMNonX retweeted
Cool, but still useless from my POV Things that we will never see and I wish to: - Where is clearly stated that the foundation has shares in xMoney (I verified all public companies the final beneficiaries are the founders not the foundation, all 3 entities from Portugal, Romania and Estonia, dividends go to owners not to the foundation if is not there, there are two more entities not visible to see the end owners in Liechtenstein xMoney Global and xMoney Labs, probably used for the last raise or whoever knows why, that puts xMoney at already 5 entities) - How much foundation assets were distributed as “grants” to each individual company the Labs, xPortal, xMoney (since I am confident these got more than the protocol itself) - Why there are two labs one in Romania, one in LIECHTENSTEIN (old known as xWorlds, is this still funded by the foundation, if so why, how much it wasted, who is responsible for?) - Who owns the trademarks/IPs, as of public records all related IPs of MultiversX, xPortal are owned by another private entity not affiliated / reported in the above PDF) is this company getting paid by foundation for the holding or anything like that? listafirme.eu/meta-technolog… - How are you preventing self dealing between founders since the directors/board members of the foundation are the same people owning all other entities, there is no public accountability or larger board of people/advisors to that foundation that could hold accountable the council of the foundation. Every other foundation has public workers like Sol/Eth etc - Why no other core team member is visible as shareholder of labs or board members of the foundation? I would expect at least 3 more up there, the most important Adrian (you know the brain of the team) + maybe Sasu, Andrei … I won’t even dare to ask for external people that would be too much of a request from my side :)) Basically as a summary of a very high end investigation and overall how industry and foundations works: You create the foundation, then you create your own companies, then you grant funds and pay your own companies to build on your own chain, then if these companies become profitable or you sell them you own nothing back to the foundation itself, that’s why is very important to see clearly the stakeholders of all these companies and prove the foundation owns these entities in full or in a percentage How do I know some of the stuff ? Well I do also have a foundation and an AG in the same environment as they do, clearly my foundation owns the AG is a simple document you can extract proving the ownership. For Romania companies is even easier since is public same for other EU countries like Estonia, Portugal etc. Except in Liechtenstein where privacy is the selling point :) At some point I will do my own overview and link well all entities I am aware of, if more people are interested, if everyone still wants to stay blinded then I will save my time and move on I tend in the past year to clearly see the management failure vs the clear success of the tech team(even if slow due to budget), is obvious incompetence (and hopefully not fraud) has been a key part of our sadly long downfall. The CEX liquidity shows it all if a whale would want to exit today there is no more than $20-30k liquidity on the buy side on the biggest CEXs, same on the sell side very hard to get an entry at this price unless OTC buying from them most probably What would save us, from my opinion? Probably a clean independent investigation into the foundation dealings over the years, seeing clearly what is still happening there in terms of assets and most important EGLD owned besides others tokens. A larger board and advisors in place, around 5 board with 5 advisors (community included that will have visibility into the real stuff happening there and be able to avoid any potential conflicts, rather than nobody seeing anything) In any case, ignore everything from above, what do I even know myself ;)
5 protocol upgrades, 6 successful governance proposals, and a 60% leaner footprint. Today we are releasing the State of the Foundation Report covering fiscal years 2024 and 2025. It provides $EGLD stakeholders with a detailed account of how the Foundation allocated funding, the initiatives and upgrades supported across the period, and the governance votes that shaped the network. files.multiversx.com/Multive…
26
18
105
8,360