I feel like $NEAR makes way more sense than $ZEC Am I retarded

Sep 23, 2026 · 9:58 PM UTC

167
18
847
91,263
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @aaalex
Near and xmr and Bitcoin and ETH. Did I just solve money?
3
22
5,386
Wow
3
5,055
Replying to @aaalex
Dumb question but are there any stonk memes paired with Near?
3
10
5,162
Replying to @aaalex
buy RHEA and have exposure to both
2
6
5,275
Yessir have a bag ofc
3
4,927
Replying to @aaalex
Yes
1
35
2,141
Replying to @aaalex
no
See this thesis by @mert on $NEAR. ZEC is the privacy equivalent to $BTC - a private SoV. But ZEC can’t do more than that. And it shouldn’t. It does very well what it’s supposed to do. $NEAR brings privacy to smart contracts, perps, payments/trades, agents, AI inference, stocks, and the whole flow of money. Sort of how $ETH was meant to be complementary to Bitcoin and the DeFi layer. But ETH turned out to be imperfect. Now it’s NEAR what is connecting all L1s and L2s, adapting to their language and architecture (PoW, EVMs, rust, move, etc) instead of forcing them to build on top. And now we have AI and agents. Not only did @NEARProtocol pioneer sharding at scale (where ETH failed), it also became the first-ever blockchain with dynamic resharding, which allows it to scale horizontally dynamically as per demand — a must for a mass-scale agentic economy. This is a big moat that no one has been able to even attempt. It also achieved 1M TPS and it’s already Quantum Resistant. So you have a massively scalable and high-performance L1, with native privacy, interconnecting any blockchain in the space, built for an agentic economy, powering both money flows and inference. ZEC is the privacy SoV. NEAR is the privacy programmable layer. The TAM (total addressable market) of NEAR is in discovery mode.
12
3,584
Replying to @aaalex
NEAR much more complex than ZEC
1
11
2,034
Replying to @aaalex
Not retarded. this is actually what the logic suggests
4
640
Replying to @aaalex
agreed
2
379
Replying to @aaalex
Near is not money. And you wouldn’t want it to be money. And it is not trying to be money.
1
2
563
Replying to @aaalex
definitely feeling $NEAR over $ZEC
2
557
Replying to @aaalex
it’s NEAR bro
1
437
Replying to @aaalex
Why not both equally makes sense?
1
535
Replying to @aaalex
no. it is just more complicated to explain so people will do the research after the pump. few.
1
846
Replying to @aaalex
Near is the zcash blockchain
2
311
Replying to @aaalex
both make sense
134
Replying to @aaalex
No you arent 🤝
187
Replying to @aaalex
No you’re not. Early.
173
Replying to @aaalex
nope, you're very intelligent. nintelligent. 🫵
472
Replying to @aaalex
Maybe you're not near intents.
8
398
Replying to @aaalex
Near is private swaps, zec is private vault
8
518
Replying to @aaalex
Correct …. $Near is likely to give more Xs
1
5
780
Replying to @aaalex
Nope. $NEAR is $ZEC on steroids
1
4
733
Replying to @aaalex
Utility vs SoV - BTC v Eth has shown this story
3
612
Replying to @aaalex
nah youre not ...... everyone is quietly asking the same thing
2
1,229
Replying to @aaalex
Either that or a full fledged scammer. Either way nobody should listen to you.
1
2
1,674
Replying to @aaalex
4
366
Replying to @aaalex
comparing privacy coins to a sharded L1 is wild not even the same sport
4
1,354
Replying to @aaalex
No you're not
517
Replying to @aaalex
Zec is cult story and near is metric story so yes you are retarted in thinking this way which I do as well.
1
842
Replying to @aaalex
Yes it makes sense but many retards bought $ZEC instead
2
609
Replying to @aaalex
Near has far more utility than Z cash
1
75
Replying to @aaalex
Yes you are retarded we all are.
9