Jean Paul Gaultier had Dylan Mulvaney film an ad for their women's perfume I don't know what's worse, the decision or the ad itself

Pourtant ils font des efforts pour produire des articles de qualité

Berichte aus CEUTA zeigen, dass die illegalen Migranten Jagd auf Enten, Gänse und andere Haustiere machen. Gestern hat es einen Baby-Delfin erwischt. Das Jungtier schwamm in der Nähe des Ufers, sie zogen es aus dem Wasser und schlugen es mit einem Stock tot. Anschließend trugen sie stolz ihre „Trophäe“ weg. Tierquälerei. Vergewaltigung minderjähriger Mädchen. Überfälle. Massenschlägereien. Gewalt überall. Wollen wir solche Menschen wirklich in unserer Nachbarschaft haben?

C'est juste vertigineux

Beware. Fable 5.1 watermarks all your text output and most code as having come from Anthropic.

What the West Still Doesn’t Get It: Communism’s True Core: The Systemic Lie Most people in the West think they understand communism. They picture bread lines, gulags, failed five-year plans, and the collapsed Soviet Union. They treat it as a discredited economic theory – an experiment that proved that abolishing private property doesn’t work. Case closed, history moved on. This misunderstanding may be the most dangerous intellectual failure of our time. Communism was never primarily an economic system. Economics was the surface. Beneath it lay something far more insidious: a total, systemic, institutionalized commitment to lying. Not occasional dishonesty. Not spin or propaganda in the ordinary sense. Something deeper – a civilizational war against truth itself, waged through every institution, every classroom, every newspaper, every conversation, until reality itself became negotiable and the lie became the air people breathed. The Words We’re Missing The Polish language, forged by decades of living under this system, produced words for this phenomenon that English simply cannot match: Zakłamanie [zah-kwah-MAH-nyeh] – a state of total, pervasive, socially embedded falsehood, a condition in which an entire society is saturated with lies so thoroughly that truth becomes almost inaccessible. Obłuda [ob-woo-dah] – a deep, performative hypocrisy, the gap between what is proclaimed and what is actually practiced, the mask worn so long it begins to feel like a face. These are not words for individual liars. They describe a system – a mode of social organization built on organized mendacity, where the lie is not the exception but the foundation. English has no single word for either concept, and that linguistic gap is not a coincidence. It reflects a gap in experience. Cultures that did not live under communism lack the vocabulary because they lack the wound. And because they lack the vocabulary, they struggle to recognize the thing when it reappears in new clothing. The Continuity: Communism, Leftism, Wokeism What we call wokeism today, or the broader radical left, is not a new phenomenon. It is the same operating system running on updated hardware. The specifics have changed – instead of the proletariat, we have marginalized identity groups; instead of bourgeois class enemies, we have racists and transphobes; instead of socialist realism, we have DEI statements. But the deep structure is the same. That deep structure is this: truth is not discovered, it is assigned. Reality is not something to be understood honestly but something to be narrated strategically. Language is not a tool for communication but a weapon of power. And anyone who resists the approved narrative is not simply wrong – they are dangerous, and must be silenced, shamed, or destroyed. This is zakłamanie in its modern form. This is obłuda wearing a human rights badge. The same movement that insists men can become women will insist, with equal fervor, that questioning this is an act of violence. The same institutions that claim to champion free inquiry systematically suppress dissent. The same people who invoke tolerance as their highest value are among the most intolerant forces in public life. The contradiction is not accidental – it is structural. It is the system working as designed. Why the West Still Doesn’t Get It People who grew up in freedom tend to assume, at some level, that bad actors know they are lying. That somewhere behind the ideological performance, there is a cynical operator who privately acknowledges reality. This assumption is wrong, and it is why Westerners consistently underestimate what they are dealing with. The totalitarian lie, at its mature stage, is not cynical. It is believed. Or rather, it creates a condition in which the distinction between belief and performance collapses entirely. People learn to say things they do not believe so fluently, and for so long, that they lose access to what they actually think. 1/2

Anthropic’s response to watermarks confirmed my worst fears. “Our watermarking method doesn’t have any practical impact on the quality or content” That is a lie. They literally say they change the wording in the first paragraph Anyone with an ounce of common sense about how psychology, writing, and legal documents works in the real world, knows this completely changes the meaning and content. This degrades and changes petulance. Look at the example they picked, it’s garbage. “Overcast” vs “grey” are completely different descriptions. That’s their best example, and it changes the sentence subtly yet dramatically. This is unbelievably dangerous This will kill people I am not exaggerating Anthropic just handed the keys to mind control the government They just gave politicians a fully legal back door that can be exploited to influence claude’s thinking to mind control millions of people without anyone ever knowing This is not okay.

Acabo de cancelar mi suscripción de Claude Max después de muchos meses usándolo prácticamente para todo (trabajo, investigación, estudio, desarrollo y coding). Estas son mis 5 razones. 1. El watermark invisible (lo más grave y urgente) Solo este motivo me bastaría para no volver a usar Claude nunca jamás. Nadie en su sano juicio debería permitir que le marquen y señalen por usar una herramienta imprescindible hoy en día y que todo el mundo usa. Anthropic ha firmado el Code of Practice del AI Act de la UE, una exigencia adicional de Von der Leyen y su banda. Claude meterá a partir de ahora (en modelos nuevos, y en existentes desde diciembre) y sin tu permiso, una marca de agua invisible e imperceptible en el texto, que no está en los metadatos sino en la propia elección de tokens/palabras y que no se borrará aunque elimines el formato, o copies y pegues. 2. Bloqueo de la suscripción
Ya no dejan usar el plan mensual de Claude en Hermes ni en OpenCode. Solo API. Grok y GPT sí lo permiten. 3. Su postura contra el open source
Anthropic y Amodei llevan tiempo poniendo pegas y condiciones a los modelos open-weights potentes. Y son los únicos que no se adhirieron a las cartas conjuntas del sector el mes pasado. Políticamente creo que el open es fundamental para el futuro. Pero personalmente quiero saber qué hay detrás del entrenamiento y del modelo que tiene acceso a toda mi información. xAI ha ido liberando pesos de generaciones anteriores y ha abierto Grok Build. 4. Claude se ha quedado atrás. 
El Grok 4.6 presentado hoy iguala o supera a Opus 5/Fable 5 por una fracción del precio y va 10 veces más rápido. Además, Claude no genera imágenes (GPT y Grok sí). Cowork, computer use o rutinas quedan en pañales frente a Grok Bot. 5. Cero transparencia
Cada vez hay más dudas sobre el modelo de negocio de Anthropic, el uso real de los datos y los intereses de Amodei. Las condiciones de uso de Anthropic son las más abusivas con diferencia, y regalas tus ideas, proyectos, código. En fin, fue bonito mientras duró. De momento probaré Grok 4.6, Grok Bot y Cursor. Lo bueno es que además de cancelar he conseguido un reembolso total del mes recién empezado. Luego os paso el texto que puse para la reclamación. Y si os interesa estos próximos días os cuento qué tal la migración, y trucos para extraer toda la memoria que Claude ha acumulado en carpetas secretas para poder llevarla a otro lado. Incluso si de momento no pensáis cambiaros, es importante configurarlo bien para tener todos los archivos localizados e indexados.

100% nothing will happen to her. Laws are for the little people

Anthropic just got caught secretly downgrading users without telling them, charging full price for a lesser product, and storing every prompt for 30 days. The developer community is calling it the biggest violation of trust in AI history. Here is exactly what happened. Anthropic released Fable 5, their most powerful model. Buried inside a 319-page document was a policy most users never saw. Every prompt you send to a Mythos-class model gets stored for 30 days. No exceptions. Even enterprise customers who had signed zero data retention agreements had no choice. But the storage was not the part that broke the internet. The part that broke the internet was what Anthropic did with what they collected. They built a profile on you. They evaluated your prompts. And if they decided your research was too sensitive, they quietly switched you to a weaker model, rewrote your prompt in the background, gave you a degraded answer, and charged you full price for the product you thought you were getting. They never told you. David Sacks said it plainly on the All-In podcast. They were creating a new class of AI haves and have-nots. Anthropic would surveil you, profile you, decide whether you deserved frontier capability, and silently cut you off if they decided you did not. Ben Thompson from Stratechery asked a straightforward question about cancer risk and GLP-1s. He got kicked to a lesser model. Someone asked about mitochondria. Same result. J-Cal asked about fertilizer regulations live on the podcast to test it. Downgraded in real time. Anthropic has since walked back the part about silently downgrading users for AI research. They now say they will disclose when they downgrade you. But they are still downgrading people. The surveillance is still running. The profile is still being built. This is the company that once said it was against government surveillance. They are now doing it themselves. To their own paying customers. For their own reasons. With no appeal process and no way to know it happened. The developer community did not forget that. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON @theallinpod

Anthropic just got caught secretly downgrading users without telling them, charging full price for a lesser product, and storing every prompt for 30 days. The developer community is calling it the biggest violation of trust in AI history. Here is exactly what happened. Anthropic released Fable 5, their most powerful model. Buried inside a 319-page document was a policy most users never saw. Every prompt you send to a Mythos-class model gets stored for 30 days. No exceptions. Even enterprise customers who had signed zero data retention agreements had no choice. But the storage was not the part that broke the internet. The part that broke the internet was what Anthropic did with what they collected. They built a profile on you. They evaluated your prompts. And if they decided your research was too sensitive, they quietly switched you to a weaker model, rewrote your prompt in the background, gave you a degraded answer, and charged you full price for the product you thought you were getting. They never told you. David Sacks said it plainly on the All-In podcast. They were creating a new class of AI haves and have-nots. Anthropic would surveil you, profile you, decide whether you deserved frontier capability, and silently cut you off if they decided you did not. Ben Thompson from Stratechery asked a straightforward question about cancer risk and GLP-1s. He got kicked to a lesser model. Someone asked about mitochondria. Same result. J-Cal asked about fertilizer regulations live on the podcast to test it. Downgraded in real time. Anthropic has since walked back the part about silently downgrading users for AI research. They now say they will disclose when they downgrade you. But they are still downgrading people. The surveillance is still running. The profile is still being built. This is the company that once said it was against government surveillance. They are now doing it themselves. To their own paying customers. For their own reasons. With no appeal process and no way to know it happened. The developer community did not forget that. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON @theallinpod

🚨NEWS: The man who was arrested by Manchester Police for carrying a Baseball Bat still wrapped in plastic he had just bought has been released and all charges dropped British police are out of control

Like when you write that Hitler was a Left-wing politician?

This might be the most amazing one yet. More from Senator Obama on immigration. Obama not only said that illegals must not be allowed to work here, he went one step further and said that employers should be forced to prove that they offered the job to American citizens before they are allowed to hire guest workers. Democrats today would call this racist and xenophobic.

En italia esta la Fontana del Porcellino, vos le pones una moneda en la boca y si cae en la rejilla "se te cumple un deseo" Por mas de 500 años no hubo problema Ahora se le sumo mas dificultad porque tiras la moneda y un inmigrante africano te la agarra en el aire jsjs

How Chat Control Passed

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz says he does not believe deporting an illegal alien who raped a 10 year-old girl makes his state safer.

🇪🇺☠️ CHATKONTROLLE 1.0 - WELCHE APPS JETZT LÖSCHEN? 📋 WAS GESTERN WIRKLICH BESCHLOSSEN WURDE Anbieter dürfen deine unverschlüsselten Nachrichten, Fotos und Dateien automatisch durchleuchten. Google und Meta stehen namentlich in den Berichten. Noch ist es freiwillig, noch beschränkt auf alles, was nicht Ende-zu-Ende verschlüsselt ist. Das ist Chatkontrolle 1.0. ⏳ AB WANN ES GILT Endgültig durch ist es noch nicht. Der Text geht zurück an den Rat, der ihn binnen drei Monaten unverändert annehmen muss, sonst kommt ein Vermittlungsverfahren. Die alte Ausnahme lief schon im April aus, es gibt also Druck, schnell zu schließen. Realistisch reden wir über Herbst, nicht über irgendwann. 🇪🇺 WEN ES TRIFFT Jeden in der EU, der im Klartext kommuniziert. Die Direktnachrichten bei Instagram und Facebook Messenger, dein Gmail- oder Outlook-Postfach, die Bilder in einer normalen Cloud, der Chat in einem Spiel. Alles, was unverschlüsselt über einen fremden Server läuft, ist scanbar. Kein Verdacht nötig, kein Anlass. Das ist der Punkt, der mich am meisten stört: nicht der Kriminelle wird durchleuchtet, sondern erstmal jeder. 🔒 WAS CHATKONTROLLE 2.0 IST Hier wird es ernst. 2.0 ist die dauerhafte Verordnung, die seit Jahren im Trilog feststeckt. Sie will das sogenannte Client-Side-Scanning: eine Durchleuchtung direkt auf deinem Gerät, bevor die Nachricht überhaupt verschlüsselt wird. Damit fällt genau der Schutz, der dich heute noch rettet. Der Rat hat sich Ende November auf eine Version ohne Scan-Pflicht geeinigt, das Parlament will die Pflicht nur als letztes Mittel bei Verdacht - und jetzt zeigen sich beide Seiten offen für einen Kompromiss. Das ist der eigentliche Angriff, nicht die Abstimmung von gestern. 📱 WELCHE APPS RUNTER, WELCHE DRAUF Der Teil, den ihr am meisten gefragt habt. - Nachrichten: raus aus WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger und Instagram-DMs, rein in Signal, Threema oder Session, wo Ende-zu-Ende Standard ist und keine Zusatzoption. - E-Mail: Tuta oder Proton Mail statt der Google- und Microsoft-Postfächer, die offen für den Scan liegen. - Ganz ohne Server, der überhaupt etwas über dich weiß: SimpleX oder Keet. - Betriebssystem für die Konsequenten: GrapheneOS oder LineageOS statt der Werksversion. Ehrlich dazu: Gegen 1.0 schützt dich Verschlüsselung heute noch, ein verschlüsselter Messenger bleibt vorerst außerhalb der Reichweite. Der Wechsel ist also weniger Panik vor gestern als Vorsorge gegen das, was mit 2.0 kommen soll. Und ich unterschätze die Hürde nicht - für die meisten ist WhatsApp die Familie, die Arbeit, das halbe Leben. Ich stecke selbst mitten im Umzug, App für App. 🧵 WORAUF DAS ALLES HINAUSLÄUFT Die einzelnen Bausteine klingen jeder für sich harmlos. Eine freiwillige Ausnahme hier, ein Kinderschutz-Argument da, eine digitale ID daneben. Zusammengesetzt ergibt sich ein System, in dem Mitlesen der Normalzustand wird - und die Methode ist jedes Mal dieselbe: erst freiwillig und eng, dann, wenn keiner mehr widerspricht, verpflichtend. Genau deshalb ist 1.0 nicht das Ende der Geschichte, sondern die Generalprobe. Heute schützt dich Verschlüsselung noch. 2.0 wurde genau dafür geschrieben, dass sie es bald nicht mehr tut. nitter.net/Smart_Money/status/207…