A forensic audit has uncovered false readings and widespread errors in the Bureau of Meteorology’s raw climate data, including blocks of temperature readings copied and pasted across different years and seasons, ­raising questions about the ­integrity of records used for climate analysis. Read the full article here: bit.ly/4yPqjNx

Oct 16, 2026 · 10:45 PM UTC

113
299
849
78,749
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @australian @szabosolicitors
🌳🌳 Who is surprised-climate grifters, paid up scientists & financial beneficiaries would do anything to validate their agenda 🌳🌳
2
34
746
Replying to @australian
I mean, on how many levels are our governments and their agencies corrupt? It’s insane we put up with this crap.
1
13
324
Replying to @australian
How much taxpayer money has been spent, and how many times have politicians misled us, on the basis of this falsified data?
2
2
45
895
Replying to @australian
@craigkellyAFEE was right again
4
1
145
1,430
Replying to @australian
Duh! They’ve been changing the readings. We’ve known this for years.
1
2
6
199
Replying to @australian
!!!
2
6
88
1,491
Replying to @australian
It must be undeniable if climate activist The Australian is reporting on it
1
27
Replying to @australian
Remember when they called us right wing conspiracy theorists
2
15
413
Replying to @australian
Throw another 90 million at it. Surely that will fix incompetence and ideology.
1
4
122
Replying to @australian @Philssay
I wonder why anyone would do this… (sarcasm intended) FFS 🤦🏻
1
1
17
663
Replying to @australian
Ohh man 🤦. They are supposed to be scientists - and scientists are supposed to be data driven. This is nuts.
3
140
Replying to @australian
Bet nobody will be held accountable as per usual!
18
Replying to @australian
If you need to alter factual data to make your argument... Your argument is LOST.
3
69
Replying to @australian
@craigkellyAFEE was right again. He's been calling this out for years.
1
1
6
176
Replying to @australian
I’m sure “our ABC” will be right onto this story. Not.
1
1
89
Replying to @australian
Graham Lloyd is a charlatan. He has no business being a journalist let alone one who reports on science and the environment.
44
Replying to @australian
Simon holds a Cock , Mike 2 Dads Cannon Brookes & Twiggy will be crying in to their green scam soy latte when funding gets pulled
13
Replying to @australian
Telling us they spent about 16million to upgrade their website which was then a huge mess & then revealing it cost 96million Who should believe anything they say ?
5
157
Replying to @australian
It’s criminal. More ways to steal our tax dollars through fake data. By our government agencies
13
Replying to @australian
These are not errors. BOM are following the government orders to push the climate change and renewables agenda. This labor Government are becoming less trustworthy every day.
2
16
Replying to @australian
These aren’t errors. It’s by design.
11
Replying to @australian
Horse shite I won't pay for.
22
Replying to @australian
Manipulate the data and you manipulate the public narrative and Government policy.. Our 'esteemed' agencies are conflicted by political ideology and financial vested interests.
1
1
7
306
Replying to @australian
As someone that depends on accurate and dependable historical meteorological data as part of their job, this is incredibly disappointing. I don't care what the excuse, there is no reason to tamper with the measured data.
2
142
Replying to @australian
Its sounds a bit cloudy.. a bit shady.... hot news... looking forward for sunny news in da future?
84
Replying to @australian
I bet the “mistake” was used for evidence of climate change……..
1
3
177
Replying to @australian @TimjboAU
There is a lot of pressure to modify datat as historic temperature records are surprisingly sparse and only kept by the most enthusiastic and persistent of weather enthusiasts. This means that any modification of historic data for Australia has a significant impact on global data
14
Replying to @australian @MammaBear3333
These record were never meant to carry the weight of the entire future of civilisation. They’re just weather records.
57
Replying to @australian
I assume that all the false data moved the data in one way to help prove a false hood that is man made climate change
1
29
Replying to @australian
Rupert Murdoch & the last of the tragic climate change deniers still refusing to get their heads around climate science reality and pushing heads in the sand business as usual. Absolutely ridiculous.
1
2
111
Replying to @australian
No sh!t. The BOM has been fabricating temperature records for decades. Will anyone be held to account?
41
Replying to @australian @PeteWiltshire2
And what are the chances that this honest mistake has made it look like the temperature increases are not as bad as they said they were? My guess: zero!
66
Replying to @australian
Match the data to the government narrative and we'll get more funding grants to "study" the changes.
1
38
Replying to @australian
So they weren’t just taking lots of mental health days because of those nuisance concepts known as work & responsibility, they were fuelling the climate hoax as well, perhaps to attend some shouty protests.
1
1
86
Replying to @australian
We've known for years that the BOM was lying in order to promote the 'global warming' narrative. But how far have professional scientists in universities and govt departments also compromised themselves?
1
1
18
484
Replying to @australian
Hold tight to every old book. Don't trust digitisation to save records. In a purely digital age, fraud is easy and finding it near impossible.
51
Load more