Today I met a 96 year old WWII Marine; a veteran of the Battle of Saipan. He told me of the human toll he witnessed. 500 dead, 1500 injured. Because of this man I will always stand for our flag. Semper Fidelis, Marine.

It's beyond obvious that the Democrat Party sees its future in brokering the break up of America as a nation, distributing our assets to the world via "democracy," and getting rich while doing it. There is no other explanation. We either have a country or we don't.

The Federal Reserve printed roughly $4 trillion between March 2020 and early 2022, expanding its balance sheet from $4.2 trillion to over $8.9 trillion, and Jerome Powell stood in front of cameras calling the resulting price explosion "transitory." Inflation is a tax. Every dollar created without corresponding production transfers purchasing power from savers to the first spenders. The government and its preferred financial institutions spent those fresh dollars before prices adjusted. You spent them after, at a grocery store already pricing in the damage. By June 2022, CPI hit 9.1 percent, the highest since 1981. Rent, food, used cars, energy: all of it ran hot simultaneously. Monetary expansion redistributes wealth rather than creating it, taking from your pocket to give to whoever holds newly printed money first. Powell's "transitory" call was deliberate. The Fed had every price signal and money supply number available. M2 grew 27 percent in 2020 alone. That expansion predicted exactly what followed. The Fed created this inflation deliberately, financing pandemic-era federal spending that Congress could not politically tax you to fund directly. Printing was the cowardly path. You paid through purchasing power destruction rather than a visible tax line on your return, which is precisely why they preferred it.

It took us a while to get where we are and it’s going to take more than two years to unwind this mess. Further, there’s a lot of dead wood to cull in the political ranks. Hold the line.

What I'm about to write pains me, truly, but here it goes: This is the moment ladies. Right now. This is it. The response to Lindsay Clancy stunned so many men because she embodies the threat that women have been holding over all of our heads my entire life, which is ""I'll do what I want and if you don't like, too bad. I'll just kill society." She killed her children for convenience or to punish him or for whatever her selfish reason was, just as women in the aggregate are killing civilization out of seeming selfishness and spite. Ladies, the privileges of modernity are ending, whether you want them to or not. It'll just depend who ends them and what replaces them. Much of this so-called hatred of women isn't hatred of woman AS woman. It's an incredible frustration with the fact women wanted the ball and got it, and promptly fumbled it and refuse to accept accountability. Yes, lots of women are brilliant and capable but in the aggregate, they did not perform. You wanted it and our ancestors gave you the chance, and you did not deliver. There is no denying this. That's why feminists adopted the trans ideology so aggressively. It lets them claim the achievements of men as the achievements of women. Women are the majority of college grads and even employees now, but they haven't produced. Media tried to sell Kamala Harris as competent and Hillary Clinton as "the most qualified person to ever run for the White House," a lie so comically absurd that it's astonishing. Every "great" women CEO or scientist is, compared to men, a middling and moderate performer. The most high profile of them are most likely to end up in jail for fraud like Elizabeth Holmes. Women haven't produced in business or politics or science or in any of the domains they've spent a century demanding access to. They've been given every advantage to make up for so-called oppression and they've accomplished next to nothing. Even in this zero-sum situation where helping women, by definition, hurts men, men are still consistently outperforming women in every domain. Worse, where women have power, they're using it catastrophically. Women politicians are, globally, producing catastrophic outcomes while clearly preferring being influencers to wielding authority. There simply are no great women leaders. Pointing this out isn't "hating women." It's about bringing to the surface what matters because real oppression is coming. It's not going to be some feminist fantasy oppression. I'm talking about REAL oppression; abuse, rape, violence, and disenfranchisement; women being stripped of all of the contributions to society except being broodmares. Everything they've accused Western men of doing (but who never would) is coming. Women are different than men. They're equal only in dignity. Society must reflect this or all is lost. I hate this because I'm an egalitarian at heart. I hate that I've had to, at this stage in my life, adopt positions that I once recognized as abhorrently sexist or racist. I yield to reality though. Sir Francis Bacon once wrote that "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." Well I obey. If we're to survive, women are going to have to do the same, but there seems to be little interest from women in doing that. How are men supposed to respond to that? Well, most men are simply resigning themselves to death, and the death of their civilization at your hands, like a father watching his wife trans his kid and being unwilling to do what it takes to stop her. I wish 20th century egalitarianism was true. I wish "girl power" was a thing. I wish there was a women Einstein and Mozart or Caesar. There isn't. It's time we came to terms with that.

I want to shake the hand of the guy who wrote this... Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital? Have you heard a Muslim orchestra? Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade? Have you witnessed a Muslim charity? Have you shaken hands with a Muslim Girl Scout? Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper? The answer is no, you have not. Just ask yourself WHY ??? Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America 's history." AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE Dear Mr. Obama: Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians. Were those Muslims who celebrated the first Thanksgiving Day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians. Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights? Didn't think so. Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England? No. Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug-nosed slaves." Says a lot about what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it, Mr. Obama? Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights. Where were Muslims during this country's Women's Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so that they are often beaten for not wearing the 'hijab' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they? Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops, and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews. Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, or a field in Pennsylvania, killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East. No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims whose asses you bent over backward to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day. And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America ... Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslims. And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, don't forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers. That, Mr. Obama, is the "Muslim heritage" in America EVERY AMERICAN MUST READ THIS !! Be sure to SEND IT TO ALL. Muslim Heritage,

They forget the words, “ I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.”

Them: “What do you do on vacation?” Me: “Sit on my ass, day drink under an umbrella, and stare at the water for 8-10 hours.” That’s it. That’s the daily agenda. No activities, no shopping, no sight seeing. Get a decent buzz and do nothing.

Connect the dots. -The Federal Reserve system. -FDR’s “New Deal." -Y2K. -“Net Neutrality.” -“Climate Change.” -“Green New Deal.” -Obamacare. -Dodd/Frank. -COVID. What did they all have in common? 1. Democrats did it. 2. They relied on an actual crisis or an invented crisis to put a largely irrational, existential fear in the minds of average Americans. 3. As a result, personal liberty and economic freedom were willingly handed over to the central government for “safety.” (Or, as with “Net Neutrality,” that handover was attempted but failed.) 4. The effort perversely resulted in the exact opposite of the stated aims. 5. The only groups to benefit were (i) Democrat politicians, (ii) Deep State bureaucrats and (iii) an oligarchy of corporations who gained market control and coincidentally were huge Democrat donors. Connect the dots. Now consider how overnight the Democrats have uniformly decided AI is an existential threat to humanity that must be brought under the control of the powerful central government and a handful of existing oligarchs in the space.

Someone Finally Said It Black Lives Matter, Al Sharpton, the NAACP these aren't civil rights organizations anymore. They're narrative management outfits. They activate when a case serves the political architecture that funds them. George Floyd served that architecture. Trayvon Martin served it. Michael Brown served it. Each one had a usable angle: white perpetrator, black victim, systemic racism frame, media saturation, fundraising pipeline. Lindsay Clancy is a white woman who strangled her three children. The holdout juror is a black man refusing to let her walk on an insanity defense. That configuration doesn't serve any fundraising template. There's no white-on-black violence to monetize. There's no systemic racism angle to wedge. The juror isn't a victim of quote/unquote "racism" he's a victim of a narrative that needs him to fold. So What Is The Main Agenda Being Performed Here? The Clancy defense rests on postpartum psychosis a mental health framing that intersects with the progressive policy agenda on women's health, maternal mental health funding, and dismantling carceral responses to mental illness. That's a left-aligned policy cluster. The eleven jurors voting NCR aren't just doing what progressive prosecutors and defense attorneys want they're doing what the entire ideological infrastructure has pre-ordained as the correct outcome. A black juror standing in the way of that outcome is, to the machine, a traitor to the cause. Not a citizen doing his duty. A problem. Oprah and Gayle King won't say a word. They won't say a word because they don't see a juror being harassed. They see an obstacle to the correct outcome being removed through public pressure, and that's a tool they're comfortable with.

Good morning everyone. Just a quick reminder that that thing that wasn't happening, is happening again.

A fun thing I learned this weekend is that even though I pay for everyone else’s retirement, health care, food, childcare, and schooling—not to mention all the foreign militaries I subsidize—wanting at least some of my tax dollars to benefit me is apparently communism. I learned this from conservatives who’ve conserved nothing but the welfare state, infinity immigration, left-wing cultural victories, and forever wars, so that’s fun.

This is perhaps the best thing produced by the internet in recent history. [📹 linda. buzz.official]

Yes, we have a birth rate problem. Think a little tax credit is going to excite folks into making babies? How about y’all stop printing money and diluting currency value.

And how much did this little junket cost Tulsa taxpayers? Potholes, street repair, signage, park improvements, school air conditioning - 42 other priorities deserved the fund allocation before this BS.

Social Security is a Ponzi scheme

Sixty-two years and $22 trillion later, the U.S. poverty rate sits at roughly 11 percent, almost identical to where Lyndon Johnson found it in 1964. The government ran the most expensive social experiment in human history and produced nothing measurable. Bureaucracies perpetuate themselves, and this policy worked exactly as designed. When Washington transfers purchasing power to the poor through SNAP, Medicaid, housing vouchers, and 126 other overlapping programs, it doesn't eliminate scarcity; it relocates decision-making from individuals to administrators. Those administrators develop career interests in perpetuating dependency, because a solved problem eliminates their department. Free market thinkers identified this perverse incentive structure before Johnson signed the Economic Opportunity Act. Every dollar taxed from productive activity carries a deadweight cost before it reaches anyone's dinner table. Capital formation lifts people out of poverty. You build wealth through savings, property rights, and voluntary exchange, none of which $22 trillion in redistributed spending actually produced.

When Obama took office in January 2009, the federal debt sat at roughly $10.6 trillion. By January 2017, it had climbed to $19.9 trillion. He doubled the national debt in eight years. No president in history had added that many nominal dollars. You cannot spend your way out of a credit collapse any more than you can drink your way out of a hangover. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 injected $831 billion into the economy, mostly through government construction projects and transfer payments. The Federal Reserve simultaneously held interest rates near zero for seven consecutive years. The result was asset price inflation concentrated in equities and real estate, which benefited existing wealth-holders while workers saw stagnant real wages throughout the decade. The Affordable Care Act (2010) mandated purchases and created a regulated marketplace that delivered neither affordability nor genuine care improvements. Premiums on federal exchanges rose an average of 25 percent in 2017 alone. Obama was structurally typical: a president who believed that state power could solve problems that state power had manufactured. Sound money advocates have a word for that cycle: politics. The bill is the same either way.

Pack the court, eliminate the electoral college. That’ll “save democracy”

Summer slowly coming to a close. 🥹

Almost every rule and societal guardrail in existence today is because of the bottom quintile. If you’re employed and paying taxes, the % of $ that is directly & indirectly diverted to the recipient class should outrage you.