I remember fud threads from tibbir bros massive aura losses for some

Dividend investors 🤝 us

$LAPTOP September 9

$tibbir 🌁

$INDEX continues to fractal like clockwork.

Rome wasn’t built in a day. We’re still dealing with the legal paperwork behind Stratton, and yeah, some of it is taking time. But we’re here to stay. Tokenomics will be released Monday. Also on Tuesday, at market open, we’re opening the doors to Stratton with one pair to start: $DSS. This is still experimental for us, so we’d rather start with one pair, use it as proof of work, test everything properly, and then add more as we optimize the workflow. For now, we’re staying WL only this weekend, with tests being run every day. Slowly getting the machine running.

$INDEX official account just liked this post 😮‍💨

bros can we stop selling our proven bags for scams

Yes @uncacheable8888 $INDEX

can’t wait for the baskets 👀

Few more days of this and brian will be forced to reveal the dogs name

we live rent free in beeboops head

The most interesting idea during the whole pennystock meta in my opinion is @strattonmrkt by @VictorOnChain (aka XVentures on fomo) from @XVentures_Fund, a Germany based boutique web3 venture capital which is the host of @proofoftalk (High-end Web3 summit that big names like a16z, Dragonfly and etc. participate). While other launchpads are building on top of Robinhood tokenized stocks, Stratton is trying to become the tokenized stock issuer + market maker + launchpad itself for penny stocks Robinhood does not tokenize, through a regularized SPV that just registered in Delaware, US (File No.10752559) Pros: - Much larger asset universe — Stratton tokenizes stocks Robinhood does not currently support, especially microcaps/penny stocks. - Stronger differentiation — instead of competing with Long/Pons/Pair on Robinhood tokenzied stocks, Stratton can decide which stocks come onchain. - Broader revenue sources — Stratton could capture value from issuance, market making, trading, launchpad activity, and potentially external integrations. - Potentially stronger moat — if its issuance + reserve + arbitrage infrastructure works out, this is much harder to copy than a standard stock-meme launchpad. Cons: - Unclear tokenomics and flywheel mechanism - Far more capital intensive — underlying shares must actually be purchased and held to support token supply. Expanding to many tickers could require millions or tens of millions of dollars of stock inventory. This has went beyond a normal launchpad universe. - Heavy market-maker dependence — current peg stability relies strongly on Stratton/MM mint-burn and arbitrage activity. - Reserve transparency is currently unclear — users need credible proof that outstanding tokens match actual broker-held shares. - Much greater regulatory complexity — creating a stock-linked token itself is substantially more complicated than merely integrating Robinhood-issued securities. - Substantial risk with penny stocks — penny stocks have worse liquidity and higher corporate-action/delisting risk. - Operational challenges — keeping dozens of microcap tokens properly backed and close to NAV is a much harder system to operate. Currently Victor seems to be the only one commited to Stratton. I'm not sure if others in the VC are also involved. Super risky because Victor is facing the complexity of moving stocks on chain himself, regulatory problems and active market-making required. I doubt a single dev can handle these. If this really plays out, I think it will become an unchallengable player in the penny stock sector. Upside is uncapped. The token $Stratton 0xb7eaecc89d3e2f9fd597d61726ae824900db8360 consolidating between 2M FDV to 4M tells us that it's still speculation as of now, always DYOR.