They just want better textbooks.

Macron should face military tribunal once the junta is installed.

Getting close to Leviathan time.

Truly incredible to witness. Like living in the opening act a grim dsytopian movie.

Holy. Shit. Drone footage from the UK tonight… The UK government is using the cover of darkness to continue importing foreign men. They will all live off British taxpayers. Before long, they will all have multiple children. It’s being done on purpose.

This is a picture of Beicha. It's a small village of 128 people near Döbeln, in Middle Saxony. On 26 Sept., the villagers held a little village 'Oktoberfest,' sponsored by their local volunteer fire department. The kind of thing many municipalities across Germany are doing right now. Five migroids showed up, got drunk and started pissing in someone's garden. A fireman told them off, they left angry but they returned in four cars. Now there were nine of them. They attacked the lingering revelers at the village party, using beer mugs and broken bottles as weapons. They wounded nine people, putting six of them in hospital. Witnesses said there was blood everywhere. After the bloodbath the migroids fled. Police stopped one of the fleeing cars, took IDs, but let them go – no hard grounds for arrest. They are presently 'investigating.' The day after their attack ,some of the nine returned to the village to tell the villagers they'd burn their houses down if they talk. Wir schaffen das.

Le Tiers-Monde, furieux que la France soit devenue grâce à lui un Tiers-Monde, se multiplie pour un passage au Quart.

Les conditions inhumaines du lycée Nelson-Mandela, à Nantes. Il fallait le voir pour le croire. Verrière, bois clair, nef de 26 000 m², énergie positive. Internat de 166 lits, chambres avec sanitaires, salles de travail, patio. Deux gymnases et un mur d’escalade de 24 voies. Sections internationales, BTS, prépa. Facture d’origine : 52 à 64 millions d’euros, il y a douze ans. Le genre d’établissement qui ferait pâlir 95 pourcents des lycées français. Et c’est le lycée qu’on brûle, hall et verrière, au nom du manque de moyens. Le Site est fermé jusqu’à la Toussaint, cours à distance, remise en état chiffrée en millions. Les conditions étaient si inhumaines qu’il a fallu y mettre le feu pour les rendre visibles. Mais de qui se moque-t-on ?

Just to make you fully aware of our position as white Brits living in Britain: 250,000 armed Islamic men could wipe out most of the population of Britain within 48 hours. Communism and Islam killed millions in the 20th century. Our current Home Secretary is a revolutionary communist and Islamic fundamentalist. She is now engaged in importing weapons trained Palestinians and Afghans. 250k possible Afro-Islamic soldiers illegally crossed the channel over the last few years and now reside, at vast government expense, in military barracks and hotels strategically placed across the country. The British government could easily arm these men, in pursuit of revolutionary ideals. All Labour Ministers are Fabians and as such ARE revolutionary communists. I appreciate my view sounds insane, but here's the thing: the conditions DO exist for mass slaughter. Our governments have allowed these conditions to exist. In terms of national security, the conditions should never have been allowed to exist. When conditions exist, and exist only because of massively expensive and and massively logistical government actions, then they exist for a reason.

Everyone is Jane Doe but no one was Laken Riley Everyone is Jane Doe but no one was Iryna Zarutska

Man I hate these bots.

American an European friends, I’m so ashamed, but you need to see what France has become. Don’t make the same mistakes we did. The only peaceful solution is to send them back to their countries of origin they love so much. We cannot coexist. It will be them, or us.

Deportation NATO. A Restore Britain Government would initiate the first steps across Europe and the wider West to establish a collective border security coalition: a kind of Deportation NATO, as it were. Its chief purpose would be to deploy collective leverage – an organised, explicit, and escalatory chain of measures, from visa sanctions to lifetime re-entry bans, that member states apply in concert to secure readmission agreements and operational cooperation. Consider how much tougher the measure would be if we had an international system in place to ensure that such bans apply not only in the case of Britain, but in as many Western countries as possible. The NATO-like principle at work is clear: a lifetime ban from one member state means a lifetime ban from all. There is no reason why the same collective clout cannot also intensify the power of various other penalties like remittance taxes, trade sanctions or visa cancellations. Done once hard enough, it would not need to be deployed twice. If a country persistently refuses to accept its own nationals, the coalition will move through a pre-agreed escalation ladder: (1) naming-and-shaming (2) moving quickly to visa restrictions (3) suspension of non-essential travel (4) trade and tariff measures (5) restrictions on remittances/dividends (6) diplomatic pressure (7) for the most intransigent states, coordinated refusal to admit nationals into coalition territories. The objective is simple: make non-cooperation politically and economically unbearable for the recalcitrant state until it agrees to practical readmission arrangements. Multilateral weight magnifies cost. Sanctions from a single country are easier to absorb, but a unified bloc of economies and travel markets creates systematic and severe pressure. Coordinated restrictions would also close loopholes whereby nationals bypass one state’s measures by moving to another jurisdiction. All delivered alongside the credible and proven threat of action. A ladder published in clear terms reduces negotiation uncertainty and removes the advantage of hoping political fatigue will make sanctions temporary. The use of these levers must be governed by legal authority and parliamentary oversight. The coalition’s designation process must be transparent and evidence-based to withstand diplomatic and legal challenges. Britain is uniquely placed to lead such a coalition. Initial membership would likely consist of nations already aligned on border enforcement, intelligence cooperation, and migration control: the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Greece. Several Central and Eastern European states (notably Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic) have already voiced support for tougher deportation frameworks and would likely join. Collectively, this bloc would represent the overwhelming majority of the Western world’s desirable destinations for economic migration, giving it immense leverage over recalcitrant states.

The media is now writing headlines saying “Why a ‘rise in sexual assaults' by migrants is a price worth paying to end racism” 🚨 They go on to literally say sexually assaulting WHITE WESTERN WOMEN SPECIFICALLY IS NECESSARY for assimilation Mind is literally blown “Quasi-consensual encounters between refugees and white Western women may help with assimilation. Increasingly they result in a shared apartment and a new surname” There is NOTHING Quasi-consensual about getting sexually assaulted The media is the enemy of the people I more more into this media organization and it’s Black owned and their website is about how White women are a mistake and white people are colonizers. They basically haye white people and want them eliminated so now they’re writing articles about how white women need to accept being sexually assaulted Why are we putting up with this

The West is being destroyed. Remigration is the moderate solution.

At first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. He watched the evening news, paid his taxes, voted responsibly and believed what respectable people told him. 1. France needed immigration because the economy needed workers. 2. Diversity was an opportunity. 3. Public services were under pressure because they lacked funding. 4. Disorder at school was caused by inequality. 5. Crime statistics required context. 6. Anyone who connected these things too quickly was probably an extremist. Then his children started coming home from school saying they could barely hear the teacher. Half the lesson was spent restoring order. Teachers changed constantly. Some simply disappeared for weeks. Jean-Pierre complained once, politely. The administration explained that the situation was “challenging” and that the school was developing an “inclusive pedagogical response.” Jean-Pierre went home reassured. There were professionals dealing with it. His neighbourhood changed too. Shops closed. Others appeared. Groups of men occupied the same corners every evening. His wife stopped taking one street after dark. Jean-Pierre noticed all of this, but he had also learned that noticing patterns was dangerous. So every event remained an isolated event. One closed shop meant nothing. One assault meant nothing. Ten incidents meant ten unrelated incidents. Only a racist would connect dots. Then his daughter was sexually assaulted by a man who had recently arrived in France. Jean-Pierre was devastated. But almost immediately he began policing his own thoughts. The attacker was an individual. Of course. One must never generalise. The television explained that exploiting such crimes politically was irresponsible. A minister warned against “stigmatisation.” Jean-Pierre found himself nodding through tears. What had happened to his daughter was monstrous, but the truly frightening possibility, apparently, was that somebody somewhere might vote for the wrong party because of it. Nothing changed. His son’s school became worse. His daughter stopped going out alone. His wife wanted to move. The police were exhausted. The teachers were exhausted. The hospitals were exhausted. Jean-Pierre was exhausted. Yet every explanation he had been given required him to believe that each deterioration was temporary, accidental, exaggerated or caused by something entirely unrelated to the deterioration immediately beside it. And whenever somebody proposed that perhaps the country had made serious mistakes — about migration, authority, education, policing, integration, punishment or borders — Jean-Pierre knew the correct answer. “Careful. That sounds like the far right.” So he remained reasonable. He remained moderate. He remained informed. He remained completely incapable of drawing a conclusion from his own life. So at first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. And he still does not understand.

We need to have a serious conversation about overweight people flying on commercial airlines. I’m flying on @AmericanAir and after paying extra money to upgrade my seat, I got stuck next to a man who is 300+ pounds and stripped mid flight. None of the flight attendants wanted to confront him. He smells like 💩 and weed. He’s literally sitting in my seat and keeps touching me. For context, he’s literally 300+ pounds and I’m 120. Why does American Airlines think it’s acceptable to treat people this way?! I tried reaching out discreetly during the flight, but they have no avenues to do that.

Get a load of this delusion.

France can either go full Lee Kuan Yew or it's au revoir.

I saw a second generation African light a woman’s face on fire.