Oh ,das ist lustig. Die Idee klaue ich mal ganz frech. @Grok wo stehe ich auf derselben Skala?

One of the greatest things to happen because of internet is the way it revealed women's real nature. The child killers, rapists, perverts & selfish bitches that women have always been throughout history & yet being exempted from strictest punishments. It's no more a secret.

Ja. Ganz schlimm. Weil Frauen einfach die besseren, friedliebenderen, empathischeren Menschen sind, gell? Für Europa von 1480 bis 1913 findet die unten verlinkte Studie übrigens, dass die jährliche Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Kriegsbeteiligung unter weiblichen Regentinnen um 39 Prozentpunkte höher (bei verheirateten Königinnen die Angriffswahrscheinlichleit sogar um rund 58 %) über der verheirateter Könige lag. harishsp01.github.io/papers/…%…

Only in a technologically advanced, ultrasafe, decadent society can women pretend they don’t need men, and can do everything men can do. Only when we are so far removed from the dangers of the natural world can women afford to be this ridiculous. All I want is a return to reality

Systematischer Wahlbetrug im „Marthahaus“ in Dessau? Der bevollmächtigte Neffe einer dementen Bewohnerin erkundigte dich bei der Heimleitung nach den Wahlunterlagen seiner bettlägrigen Tante. Diese teilte ihm mit, man habe die Wahlunterlagen aller Bewohner „eingesammelt und geschreddert“. Auf Nachfrage beim Wahlbüro erfuhr der Mann, dass bereits am 10. August Briefwahlunterlagen für seine Tante beantragt und ihre Stimme abgegeben worden sei. Als Beleg zeigten Mitarbeiter einen Antrag mit der „krakeligen“ Unterschrift der 95-Jährigen. Welche Partei sie gewählt hatte, blieb aus Datenschutzgründen offen. Mittlerweile haben sich weitere Angehörige von pflegebedürftigen Bewohnern gemeldet und berichten von ähnlichen Vorfällen. Die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft findet hingegen keine Belege für Wahlmanipulation im Seniorenheim. Dass im Landkreis Dessau-Roßlau die Briefwahl wegen „Unstimmigkeiten“ neu ausgezählt werden muss, verleiht dem ohnehin brisanten Fall ein zusätzliches Geschmäckle.

Degeneration im Endstadium. Wer immer schon mal wissen wollte wie sogenannte Hochkulturen plötzlich verschwinden konnten, kann die Antwort, darauf, in Echtzeit erleben!... und dieses Video bringt es mit Bildern absolut auf den Punkt, viel, viel eindrucksvoller als es viele Worte jemals könnten...

Think about..,

Helmuth Nyborg was fired from academia for exposing the truth that IQ tests are deliberately constructed to hide the male advantage in IQ through discarding complex items and subtests that women struggle with. He found an advantage of 7 IQ points for men over women.

Do you know in 2014, Ukraine needed a loan? There were two offers on the table: 🔴The IMF dangled a $15 billion lifeline but, as always, it came with strings firmly attached. -Scrap the ban on private land ownership. -Slash pensions and subsidies,classic austerity. 🔴Russia also offered $15 billion, no strings attached, no IMF-style conditions, and no neoliberal gutting of the economy. President Viktor Yanukovych picked the Russian deal. So what happened? Washington instigated a coup, ousted the President, and installed a new puppet regime. The new Ukranian government bent the knee to the IMF, signed off an austerity program and opened the door to privatization. Now, massive chunks of Ukrainian land,about a third, are in the hands of US giants like BlackRock.

Stefan Molyneux: We took the pain out of women’s bad decisions. Then we acted shocked they stopped being careful. If she doesn’t marry, welfare. STD, free healthcare. Child outside wedlock, the state. Divorce, custody 90% of the time, alimony, child support. “We’ve just said to women, you will never suffer any negative material consequences from your bad decisions.” Morality comes from negative consequences. Take them away and people go crazy. We’ve done that for two or three generations of Western women and shifted the bill to men. @StefanMolyneux

History already ran this experiment, Lindsay Clancy’s case is almost a carbon copy to Constance Fisher. In 1954 Constance drowned her three children in the bathtub after claiming she heard voices and she was paranoid. She was found not guilty by reason of insanity and was locked in a state hospital. They declare her better after a few years, and let her out of the state hospital. In 1966 after having three more children she drowns all three of them too. This was completely a preventable tragedy! In 2023 Lindsay Clancy strangles Cora, Dawson, and Callan with exercise bands and admits she did it. The entire defense is she was too insane to be responsible, and If the jury buys it, she doesn’t go to prison, she goes to a psych hospital that reviews her for release. One woman already showed us the sequel. The system said “she’s well now.” Six children later, she wasn’t. This is not a new story…It’s the same story with new names and a different decade. If they ever let Lindsay Clancy walk free, remember Constance Fisher.

This writes itself. White man playing the piano, Asians and whites standing in silence appreciating it, third worlder disrupts it and immediately becomes violent when his bad behaviour is pointed out. Perfect metaphor for the western world.

In 2023, Chad Doerman killed his 3 sons in a state of psychosis. He was sentenced to life in prison. Here is what didn't happen:

Bret, I find this argument, in and of itself, to be a cheat. Why? Well, it's internally consistent, or it would be internally consistent... but only in a vacuum. Only if you ignore context. When you parse the context, this whole line of reasoning becomes a strawman. The term "race realism", on the lips of those who use it, does not mean, "I just came up with some ideas out of nothing, and if you don't agree with me before the evidence has been collected, you are not realistic." It means "For seventy-five years, the West has assumed, a priori, that investigation of behavioral differences in race is not only unnecessary, but evil, because it is evil to even entertain the mere possibility that there might be some." The alternative position, therefore, is presented with the label "realism". Because "realism" means empiricism. It means looking at what is there, and conforming our theories to what we find. For seventy-five years, we have not done this. We have, instead, as a society, treated this question as a point of religious orthodoxy, rather than scientific inquiry, and persecuted dissenters as heretics. So the real question for you here is not what you think we will find if we investigate. It is whether you are in favor of investigating at all, or even simply of analyzing the data we already have, looking without fear or favor for whatever is there to find. If you are in favor of this, then you, too, are a "race realist". If not, you have some explaining to do.

This is a fascinating coincidence Is it a coincidence??

The 7 Deadly Sins…is now feminism. Same sins, Just relabeled. 👇

This is what darkskins do when they see what white people create. They hate creation because they cannot do it, and it makes them feel inferior to see us do it. This behavior is genetic. It is perfectly identical in all brownskins in all places and all times. This explains why everywhere they live is a disgusting shithole, even after white people already built it into a thriving and beautiful civilization. - Haiti - South Africa - Zimbabwe - Atlanta - Gary, IN - Egypt - India All places that whites built and browns swarmed and turned into trash, ruins, and filth. This will never stop because it is written into their DNA.

This is another clear example of how easily a false accusation can destroy a life. In 2007, 21-year-old Johnathan Montgomery was accused by his former neighbor, 17-year-old Elizabeth Coast, of sexually assaulting her seven years earlier, when she was 10 and he was 14. There was no physical evidence of any kind. A judge convicted him on her word alone and sentenced him to 45 years, suspending all but 7½. He served roughly four years before the truth finally came out. The Accusation: In October 2007, Elizabeth told Hampton, Virginia, police that in late 2000, Johnathan had sexually assaulted her at her grandmother’s house across the street from where he lived. She described graphic acts. Police investigated and charged him. There was never any physical evidence, medical findings, or independent corroboration of any kind. The case rested entirely on her testimony. The Conviction: Johnathan waived a jury trial. On June 23, 2008, a judge found him guilty of forcible sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, and related charges. The court later imposed a 45-year sentence but suspended 37½ years, leaving an effective term of 7½ years. He began serving it shortly afterward. At sentencing, Judge Randolph T. West said: “It’s no doubt in my mind that this case was a word-against-word situation, and I hope someday if I’m not wrong — and God forbid that I’m wrong — that Mr. Montgomery tell the truth to his parents as to what occurred.” The judge convicted and sentenced a young man to years in prison while openly acknowledging the case rested solely on one person’s word and expressing residual doubt about that word. 😡 The Recantation: When she was 14, her parents caught her looking at pornography. To rationalize that behavior, she falsely claimed she had been sexually assaulted at age 10 by Johnathan. The lie stayed private for three years until she reported it to police at age 17, sticking to it through the trial. In late October 2012, while working as a civilian employee of the Hampton Police Department, she came forward and admitted the entire story was a fabrication. She claimed that religion had become a bigger part of her life and that the lie was eating her up inside. She stated clearly that nothing sexual had ever happened between them. On November 9, 2012, she was arrested for perjury and immediately fired from her police job. She pleaded guilty on May 21, 2013. On August 19, 2013, she was sentenced to five years with all but 60 days suspended and ordered to pay Johnathan $90,000 in restitution. For destroying four years of a man’s life with a complete fabrication, she was required to serve only 60 days. The court even allowed her to serve those days on consecutive weekends so she could keep working. The system went out of its way to accommodate the person who had lied under oath and ruined an innocent man’s life. Exoneration: Even with a full recantation, Virginia law at the time made immediate release difficult. On November 20, 2012, Governor Bob McDonnell granted Johnathan a conditional pardon so he could be freed while pursuing a formal writ of actual innocence. On December 20, 2013, the Virginia Court of Appeals granted the writ, vacating the convictions and removing him from the sex-offender registry. Aftermath: On February 20, 2015, the Virginia legislature passed a bill awarding him $175,440 in compensation. Four years of a man’s life were taken from him because a 14-year-old girl, after being caught looking at pornography by her parents, decided to invent a childhood sexual assault to explain it. The system accepted a pure word-against-word claim with zero physical evidence, ignored the judge’s own residual doubt at sentencing, and only corrected the injustice after the accuser finally chose to tell the truth years later. Even then, it took a gubernatorial pardon and a formal writ of actual innocence to clear his name.