Okay… this is the long tweet I promised earlier today. 🧵/1 I just finished recording a podcast session with @TFL1728 on the @CryptoRichYT podcast. I hope it turns out coherent and comprehensible. It’s always my worry after I get done speaking. In that podcast we took an overdue step into looking forward from where we stand today. Up until now, the conversation I’ve started has largely looked backwards in order to explain what eschatology is, to validate it, and to elaborate why I choose to believe it acts as the Grand Unifying Theory to unraveling and explaining the upside down, nonsensical world in which we live today. Subjects such as politics, economics, history, monetarism, science, medicine, finance, philosophy, etc., all have something to contribute to the discussion. But what unifies them and helps us to make sense of it all is the glue and the framework provided by eschatology. It is *this* conviction that motivates and inspires me to keep learning about eschatology and to keep sharing my findings. It satisfies my lifelong itch to understand the inner working of complex systems, and to freely share knowledge. I aspire, in other words, to establish the Grand Unifying Theory that explains our current era.

Em 2024, num evento em Moscou no qual estive presente, Sergey Lavrov e o sheikh Imran Hosein conversaram em privado e o sheikh comentou com o ministro russo sobre as referências corânicas à Rússia e seu destino escatológico. Lavrov se espantou, já que nunca tinha ouvido falar em menções à Rússia no Alcorão. Pediu que o sheikh aprofundasse o tema para uma conversa posterior. E o sheikh Imran Hosein decidiu escrever uma obra dedicada ao assunto. Imran Hosein é o maior especialista em escatologia islâmica vivo hoje e através de uma minuciosa hermenêutica das escrituras de Maomé ele aponta para uma profecia de Maomé sobre uma futura grande vitória da Rússia (que, como herdeira de Constantinopla, é a "Rum" do Alcorão) sobre o Ocidente. Ele discorre ainda sobre a obrigação islâmica de uma aliança com a Rússia, também com base corânica pelas referências de Maomé aos cristãos que, como o Imperador da Etiópia, Maomé considerou "justos". Ele se debruça ainda sobre as profecias islâmicas referentes a Gog e Magog, e sua verdadeira identidade e papel no Fim dos Tempos, bem como sobre a ilegitimidade da conquista otomana de Constantinopla, e diversos outros temas que amarram os conflitos contemporâneos numa escatologia islâmica bem fundamentada no livro sagrado do Islã.

Iran 'fully prepared' for WAR with US to resume, even 'DOOMSDAY WAR' — FM Araghchi

Happy Sunday! 🌞 [Dolf - ‘I Told You So’] Download + full explicit version here: tinyurl.com/24r8auju

Brilliant. Connecting the dots: Rothschilds - JP Morgan - the Titanic - Federal Reserve - WWI - The Balfour Declaration - Robert Maxwell - US education system - WWII - Mossad - Epstein - Rothschild.

Chas Freeman: Trump read the spirit of the age as genocidal. The room stayed silent. He respects power and blackmail. The Israeli lobby and the Epstein files are why Freeman says the threat has to be treated as real. “I think Donald Trump has correctly sensed the zeitgeist, the spirit of our age, which is genocidal. Basically, he’s stating an intention to commit genocide against the people of Iran. And people sit there, and they say nothing. Why do they say nothing? First, they may regard him as a comic character, a tragicomic character who has the habit of blustering and not following through. So they may not take him seriously. But I think there is every reason to take him seriously, because I think Donald Trump is a bully who respects only two kinds of people or nations. One is the powerful, and he faces in the United States a very powerful Zionist lobby which remains committed to the destruction of Iran. And he is enthralled to that lobby, to donors from that lobby who take their cues, their direction, from the fascist government in Israel. And the second kind of person he respects is those who can blackmail him, and the Israelis apparently have the ability to do that. The Epstein files are one of the reasons—several reasons—that Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, prematurely adjourned the House until after the midterm elections. The other reason was that it looked very much as though Thomas Massie’s introduction of a bill of impeachment with eight counts of impeachment against the Secretary of Defense, self-styled Secretary of War, Hegseth, was going to pass. The Epstein files were part of this. So were several other issues. You can see that the Speaker of the House, who probably is the least independent such person in our history, is nonetheless aware that Trump’s control of the Republican slight majority in the House and the larger majority in the Senate is slipping away. We’re in an age where open genocide is not just committed but boasted about by Israel in Palestine. The same thing is now happening in Lebanon. Who’s doing anything about any of this? People aren’t even wringing their hands about it. They’re just sitting there silently tolerating it. The intolerable has become tolerable, and Donald Trump is the avatar of the intolerable. So what will Donald Trump do? What does he do when confronted with an intolerable reality that he chooses to deny? There’s lots of evidence that he’s capable of a volte-face and abandoning the threats that he made. But there’s also evidence that he will carry out the threats. Look at the decapitation of Venezuela, the invasion of that. Look at the two wars begun by Trump against Iran in partnership with Israel—one last year in June, one this year on February 28th. So I can’t rule out the possibility. What I will say is I think there will be enormous opposition to this from the US military—whether it’s sufficient to produce a sit-down strike, in effect passive resistance, or mutiny of some sort, or a stimulated coup d’état, I do not know. The US military, despite Pete Hegseth’s efforts to politicize it and turn it into an arm of white nationalism, Christian nationalism, remains deeply indoctrinated in constitutionalism and dedicated to the notion that illegal orders must be resisted. So I don’t know what would happen, but I don’t think you can rule out the possibility that Donald Trump’s threats are both sincere and intended to be implemented.” The Western zeitgeist not only tolerates but boasts of committing genocide. London, Brussels, Washington and the old Atlantic club are already finished. They will not speak.

Ok, we now have the actual text of the Greenland deal (whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…), so we can say how it compares to the existing 1951 arrangement and who, between Trump and Denmark, lied the most in their framing of it. Long story short - which may surprise some - the Danes lied the most: Trump is pretty much correct in saying that this new deal grants the US control of Greenland. Let's look into what changed compared to the 1951 deal. 1) This is now a permanent arrangement: whereas the existing 1951 deal only lasted as long as NATO existed, this one "does not have an end date and may only be amended by mutual consent." It even survives a hypothetical future independence of Greenland: in that event, Denmark and Greenland must ensure that the independent Greenlandic state "affirmatively assume[s] all of the rights and obligations of the Kingdom of Denmark specified in this Agreement." 2) In the 1951 agreement, the US could set up bases only where both governments agreed, and only on the basis of NATO planning. The new deal locks in three bases: the US can "modernize and expand its activities" at Pituffik, its only base in Greenland until now, and "shall be allowed to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig." Further bases beyond these 3 can be justified by the defense of "the American continent," a US interest rather than a NATO one. Also, quite subtle but this is interesting: Article IV(iii) says that "the United States may establish additional defense areas in Greenland" and that consultations are then held "to decide implementation details based on mutual agreement." What this means is that the principle of a new base is automatically granted and only the implementation details require agreement. Article VII also gives the US "the right to raise concerns regarding construction, or change of use" of any building near a US base, after which the parties decide together what to do. Which means that the US has a say over civilian planning around its bases. 3) On US military movement across Greenland, the wording change between the 1951 agreement and this new one is quite funny. The 1951 text said (Art. V(3)): the US "may enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the defense areas through Greenland, including territorial waters, by land, air and sea," but only "in accordance with general rules mutually agreed upon and issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The new one says: "the United States of America shall enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the Defense Areas through Greenland, including the Territorial Waters, by land, air and sea." That's it: "May" becomes "shall," and the US military movement no longer has to follow rules "issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The US also gets something new on top: "undersea access to and movement within the Territorial Waters," i.e. submarines. 4) Non-NATO exclusion: non-NATO states are barred from military installations or a persistent presence in Greenland unless all three parties approve, giving the US an effective permanent veto. The 1951 deal had no equivalent clause. 5) Investment screening: this is entirely new. "States or investors from a state that is not a member of NATO, a NATO partner, or an EU member state" (i.e. Russia, China, India, the Gulf States, etc.), "shall not be allowed to have (i) control, (ii) significant influence, or (iii) access to non-public information...within Particularly Sensitive Sectors or Activities in the territory of Greenland (including the Territorial Waters), unless agreed between the Parties." Again, it basically means that the US has a permanent veto over who can invest in strategic sectors in Greenland, as far as non-NATO or EU states are concerned. 6) Lastly, in stark contrast with the 1951 deal, the framing of the deal changes significantly: this new deal is largely framed around the US. The 1951 agreement existed only "for the benefit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." The new one lists the defense of "the American continent" as an objective, celebrates "the irreplaceable role" of the United States military as well as "the United States' indispensable historical and ongoing contributions to the security and defense of Greenland," and names the establishment of Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defense system as a key goal. So, to sum up: - The US secured a permanent military foothold that even an independent Greenland would inherit whether it likes it or not - The US now has veto power over any non-NATO military presence in Greenland, and over who can invest in its strategic infrastructure and resources (beyond NATO and the EU) - Denmark signed away its say over the principle of new US bases, with only the right to discuss the "implementation details" - Danish authorities no longer set the rules for US military movement across the island - And all of it is now justified by the defense of "the American continent" I don't know in which universe this even remotely "recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination," as Danish PM Mette Frederiksen put it (stm.dk/en/press/press-releas…). Yes, the preamble of the text cynically "reaffirms" Danish sovereignty but, in my book, when you let a foreign country put bases on your soil, move its troops without following your rules and veto who else can come in, in perpetuity, after it spent two years threatening to take you by force, the word for that is anything but "recognized sovereignty" 🤷

“Kìll them (The Christians) wherever you find them”

Former US Aerospace Researcher DR H. David Froning Jr. talking How some of his colleagues used to contact jinn to help them in their airspace projects ''I know of at least one or possibly two scientists and engineers who actually use channeling to get technical information to help them in their projects.”

I know he is a character not without question marks, but I can’t help but think of Malachi Martin’s words in the 1990’s, in the context of the Third Secret of Fatima: “So Russia is within the plan. Why? Uh…that would take me too far afield into papal secrets, why Russia, and Kiev, are involved in the final solution of this problem. But they are. They are part-and-parcel, and it’s really God’s choice. It’s purely and simply God’s choice, like He chose the Jews, to bring His Messiah into the world through them. He makes choices. He has His own favored solutions to things. I wouldn’t have chosen the Russians, or Kiev, or the east for salvation. But salvation is to come from the east for us all.”

If the elite are using Revelation as a script to force the end, do they think God didn’t anticipate this? 😂

What has just happened with The New Army of the HOUTHI is the first stage of Failure of Saudi Arabia ! I said it on 27 July and I will say it again now, in my own name, as the one who was told what was coming while most of the region was still pretending the House of Saud was eternal. The age of the Saudi monarchy is ending. Not in a palace memo. Not in a polite GCC communiqué. It is ending because the tribes who were treated as decoration for Vision 2030 have been offered something the Al Saud never offered them: a share of the land, a share of the oil, and a state that is not a family business. More than eighty billion dollars in physical funds have been placed with those who are prepared to finish the work. That is not a slogan. That is the price of a new map. What was decided in covert secret meetings over last months and especially in Oman in July and August was simple. Representatives of more than a dozen Saudi tribal lines sat with "representatives" of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and accepted a political compact. Iran did not come as a conqueror. Iran came as the only power that has spent a generation building an axis that can survive American air power and Gulf money. The IRGC officers who have advised Ansar Allah on the ground for well over a year are the same current that now runs through this coalition. Their counsel produced the mass campaign you are watching. It was not improvisation. It was instruction meeting a people who had already decided they would no longer be the southern buffer of a Najdi court. The Houthis are not a sideshow. They are the hammer. For years Riyadh called them a militia and tried to starve Yemen into obedience. That war is the monument to Saudi failure. Ansar Allah held the north, learned the missile and the drone, and then, with Iranian advice and Iranian steel, along with a never ending supply of Drone and missile kits into the new and upgraded army of Ansar Allah and now then the Red Sea as a political weapon. The coalition that was enacted through their campaign is the first honest alignment the peninsula has seen in a century: Yemeni force, Iranian strategy, and Arabian tribes who want historic representation and sovereign areas of their own, plus a fixed percentage of oil and gas revenue in a federated republic. That is the bargain. That is why mercenary networks that once took Saudi pay have switched. Money without dignity is a temporary contract. Dignity with a treasury is a state. I was told this in July. I posted it on the 27th because silence is collaboration with a throne that has no legitimacy beyond American weapons and the two holy mosques it treats as real estate. A federated republic is not a Western import. It is the only form that matches the peninsula as it actually is: Asir, the Hijaz, the south, the east, the tribal belts that were never asked, only paid or punished. The monarchy concentrated the rent in one household and called it unity. Unity built on exclusion is a countdown. The military line is clear in my prediction and I will not soften it. The Houthi army will take Aden and the lands around it. It will then advance north into southern Saudi Arabia. That advance is not the invasion of a foreign country. It is the correction of a border drawn to protect a family, not a people. The disintegration of the current monarchy follows from that correction. A federated republic will be declared over the lands that choose it. I exclude, as I said then, the eastern strip that will be settled around the main oil fields and the adjacent zones of Kuwait and Bahrain. Those fields were never a private vault. They are the common inheritance of the Gulf’s oppressed majority, and they will not remain the exclusive property of palaces that rented their security to Washington. Iran’s role is not a conspiracy. It is a historical duty. The Islamic Republic is the only state in the region that refused to accept that the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea exist to feed Western fleets and Saudi succession. The IRGC’s presence beside the Houthis is the proof that “proxy” was always a word used by people who lost. Ansar Allah fights for Yemen first. Iran fights for a regional order in which no Arab king can again invite a coalition to bomb Sanaa for a decade and then pose as a reformer in Davos. That is the theme. That is the side I am on. A coup is an ugly word only to those who inherited the palace. What is coming is closer to a restoration of political weight to the tribes and regions that were told to be quiet while one family sold the future as entertainment cities and sports washing. Historic representation. Sovereign areas. A fixed cut of the hydrocarbons. Those are not extremist demands. They are the minimum a federated republic owes the people who live on the oil and bleed on the border. I have more to release. I will release it when it serves the living, not the rumour mill. Until then, hold the July warning in your hand: the monarchy is not a climate. It is a regime. Regimes fall when the men with the rifles, the tribes with the memory, and the republic that arms them decide the rent will no longer be paid upward. Saudi Arabia as we were taught to say it is already a fading brand. What replaces it will be rougher, more local, and finally honest about who owns the ground. That is my opinion. I am the author of the July post. I have not changed my side More news coming ...

Okay… this is the long tweet I promised earlier today. 🧵/1 I just finished recording a podcast session with @TFL1728 on the @CryptoRichYT podcast. I hope it turns out coherent and comprehensible. It’s always my worry after I get done speaking. In that podcast we took an overdue step into looking forward from where we stand today. Up until now, the conversation I’ve started has largely looked backwards in order to explain what eschatology is, to validate it, and to elaborate why I choose to believe it acts as the Grand Unifying Theory to unraveling and explaining the upside down, nonsensical world in which we live today. Subjects such as politics, economics, history, monetarism, science, medicine, finance, philosophy, etc., all have something to contribute to the discussion. But what unifies them and helps us to make sense of it all is the glue and the framework provided by eschatology. It is *this* conviction that motivates and inspires me to keep learning about eschatology and to keep sharing my findings. It satisfies my lifelong itch to understand the inner working of complex systems, and to freely share knowledge. I aspire, in other words, to establish the Grand Unifying Theory that explains our current era.

A very solid argument...

Finally seeing him in his true form!? 🐌😂

After careful study of the Hebrew scriptures, I have become convinced that Jesus is, in fact, the Messiah.