One of the aspects of the Giggle v Tickle decision that is on a loop in my mind is that, in their minds, they haven’t made woman-only spaces unlawful.
It’s much more sinister than that.
They’ve made not accepting men who claim to be women to be unlawful.
So you can have your “woman only space”, so long as you accept that some men can be women & welcome them in, whether you like it or not.
(And thereby, obviously, making woman-only spaces obsolete in reality)
And this is why I say that women’s rights are just the canary in the coal mine of this issue. Because anyone can be told to disbelieve what they see with their own eyes under fear of punishment, and there are going to be people who were against Giggle who eventually wonder why no one tried to stop it.