Democrat strategists are now saying if Democrats take back political power, one of the first things they should do is "nationalize Starlink and SpaceX" to have the government seize the means of production from @elonmusk over his own companies... just because they hate Elon. Whether it’s forcibly seizing Elon Musk’s companies against his will to “nationalize Starlink and SpaceX” or kicking anyone who voted for Trump off the Internet for 4 years, the quiet part is getting louder every single day… Make a plan to vote. Bring a friend. Cast your ballot. & believe who people are when they tell you.

A Europa será destruída por mulheres que projetam naqueles animais a maternidade que cabia aos filhos que elas abortaram.

Canada is living through a real-life version of The Emperor’s New Clothes. We are increasingly expected to ignore what we can see with our own eyes, deny what we know to be true, and repeat things we don’t believe simply because someone in a position of authority has decided they’re the correct things to say. We’ve created a society in which certain subjects are sacred, certain questions are forbidden, and certain conclusions must be reached before the conversation has even begun. We have data showing us where things are going wrong, but instead of getting angry about the problems, people get angry at the data. Apparently, pointing out that the emperor is naked is now more offensive than the fact that he’s walking around without pants. Our institutions have become increasingly obsessed with policing not just what people do, but what they think. Employers demand approved opinions. Organizations enforce approved language. And mandatory training sessions increasingly resemble ideological re-education dressed up as professional development. All of this is presented as progress. But what exactly are we progressing towards? A society where intelligent adults are afraid to ask obvious questions? Where disagreement is treated as a moral failing? Where facts are only acceptable when they support the approved narrative? We’ve become so terrified of offending one another that we’ve forgotten how to speak to one another. And perhaps most absurdly, we’ve confused disagreement with hatred. Your political opponents are not your enemies. Someone who disagrees with your ideas is not automatically a fascist, a Nazi, a racist, or whatever other accusation happens to be fashionable this week. You can believe someone is profoundly wrong without believing they are profoundly evil. You can challenge a policy without attacking a person’s humanity. And you can acknowledge an uncomfortable fact without endorsing every possible interpretation of it. A functioning society requires the ability to do all three. Because the purpose of free speech isn’t to guarantee that everyone agrees. It’s to make it possible for us to discover where we’re wrong, identify what’s broken, and work out how to fix it. I believe we should be able to stand up and say, “Excuse me, but the emperor has no clothes.” And instead of spending the next six months investigating the motives, political affiliations, and moral character of the person who pointed it out, perhaps we could do something revolutionary. Get the emperor some freaking clothes.

The left at this point is just a gaggle of overgrown children advocating for objectively bad things while pretending the bad thing is to notice it

Ok Candace experiment over. 💁🏼‍♀️ When she posted daily about Charlie, Erika, their kids, TPUSA, or a french First Lady she’s never met… her fans thought that was normal. Daily, everyday, mental illness obsession with people consistently for years. Victim after victim. My first tweet about her, about 60 bots came at me claiming I’m obsessed to post about her. The next post, about 70 “how much are you getting paid” comments (all tiny accounts or bots.) Every time ANYONE posts anything about her these bot accounts jump in with the same key messaging. Even identical phrases. My conclusion: she likely killed Charlie or was part of it and is being paid to divide and destroy America from the inside out. That’s what I personally believe. The bot farms are all foreign. Her friends are sexual predators being arrested for trafficking. She keeps making these foreign trips to meet with outside governments. She’s a Trojan horse. 🤷🏼‍♀️ Do with that what you will.

Ok, l’Église de France a plié à jamais la partie.

Husband sent this 🤌

Trump thinks he can bully Canada and push us around. He's wrong. The only groups capable of that are: Indiginous tribes greater than 10 people, the CRA, Sikhs, public sector unions, dairy + cheese farmers, Muslims, climate alarmists, public health units, trans and 🏳️‍🌈 people.

In response to the clip going around with the African lady saying 'WHAT WHITE CULTURE!?!' Because I can explain it in more detail than anyone else... here are the main things that create western civilisation. The principle, the law of nature that is an adaptation to and what operation it creates in our civilisation. THE WESTERN CIVILISATION STACK Western civilisation can be understood as a set of adaptations to the laws of nature that allow millions of people to cooperate, solve problems and innovate together. 1. SOVEREIGNTY — Let people act. Law of nature: Knowledge and ability are distributed among individuals. No ruler or institution can know everything everyone knows. Sovereignty gives people freedom to choose, experiment and solve problems for themselves. That creates millions of independent problem-solvers instead of waiting for one authority to find the answer. 2. RECIPROCITY — Don’t impose your costs on others. Law of nature: Cooperation survives when it benefits both sides. Freedom cannot mean freedom to steal, defraud, injure or force others to carry your costs. Reciprocity means pursuing your interests while respecting the same right in others. It turns conflict into cooperation and makes peaceful life among strangers possible. 3. RESPONSIBILITY — Make people accountable for consequences. Law of nature: Every action produces consequences. Freedom works when the person making a decision also bears responsibility for its results. When people can keep the benefits of their choices while forcing the costs onto others, cooperation breaks down. Responsibility reconnects choice with consequence. 4. PROPERTY — Make control and consequences clear. Law of nature: Resources are scarce and cannot satisfy every competing use at once. Property establishes who controls something, who may use or exchange it, and who bears the consequences of those decisions. That reduces conflict, encourages people to improve what they possess, and makes investment and long-term planning possible. 5. TRUTH — Correct error faster than reality punishes you for it. Law of nature: Reality does not change because we believe something false. Truthful testimony, open criticism and evidence allow people to discover mistakes before those mistakes become catastrophes. A civilisation that can criticize and correct itself can learn faster than one that protects comforting falsehoods. 6. CONTRACT — Make cooperation possible across time. Law of nature: Cooperation requires predictable future behaviour. Promises backed by reputation and law allow strangers to trust one another enough to cooperate. Contract lets one person invest today because another can credibly promise performance tomorrow. That makes enormous networks of specialization, trade and investment possible. 7. RULE OF LAW — Replace arbitrary power with predictable rules. Law of nature: People have conflicting interests, and power creates opportunities for predation. Law provides a common procedure for resolving disputes without violence or personal rule. When rulers and citizens are both constrained by known rules, people can cooperate, invest and experiment without constantly fearing arbitrary interference. 8. DUE PROCESS — Test accusations instead of trusting authority. Law of nature: Human beings are biased, mistaken and sometimes dishonest. An accusation is not proof. Evidence, defense, confrontation, impartial judgment and appeal create an adversarial process for discovering error. Due process protects both society from wrongdoing and individuals from arbitrary punishment. 9. DECENTRALISATION — Let many solutions compete. Law of nature: No one knows in advance which adaptation will work best. Families, firms, towns, institutions and governments can try different solutions to different problems. Failures can remain local while successful solutions spread. Decentralisation therefore turns society itself into a continuous experiment. 10. MARKETS — Let reality select among competing solutions. Law of nature: Evolution advances through variation, selection and retention. Markets allow people to try different products, services and ways of organising resources. People select among them through voluntary choice. Successful solutions attract resources; unsuccessful ones disappear or improve. Markets turn millions of choices into continuous social learning. 11. SPECIALISATION — Let differences become advantages. Law of nature: People differ in knowledge, ability, resources and circumstances. Instead of everyone doing everything badly, specialization lets people become exceptionally good at different things and exchange the results. Cooperation converts human differences from a source of conflict into a source of increasing productivity. 12. SCIENCE — Institutionalise error correction. Law of nature: A false model eventually fails when tested against reality. Science turns doubt into a productive institution: observe, propose, test, criticize, replicate and correct. Knowledge therefore does not have to depend upon authority or tradition. Every generation can discover where the previous generation was wrong and build upon what it got right. 13. CAPITAL — Preserve successful adaptations. Law of nature: Progress compounds only when successful adaptations survive. Tools, businesses, infrastructure, institutions and knowledge allow yesterday’s successful experiments to become tomorrow’s starting point. Each generation does not begin again from zero. It inherits accumulated solutions and adds another layer. 14. EDUCATION — Transfer accumulated knowledge between generations. Law of nature: Individuals die; knowledge does not have to. Writing, schools, apprenticeships and universities allow discoveries to survive their discoverers. Instead of every generation rediscovering mathematics, engineering, medicine and law, it begins with thousands of years of accumulated learning. 15. COMMONS — Build things that make everyone more capable. Law of nature: Cooperation can produce benefits no individual could produce alone. Courts, roads, standards, security, scientific knowledge, infrastructure and trustworthy institutions multiply everyone's ability to act. A successful civilisation does more than protect private interests: it continually creates shared capital that makes future cooperation cheaper and more productive. THE RESULT These principles form a system: Sovereignty creates experimentation. Reciprocity makes it peaceful. Responsibility makes it sustainable. Property makes interests clear. Truth corrects error. Contract creates trust across time. Law suppresses predation. Decentralisation preserves alternatives. Markets select successful solutions. Specialisation multiplies productivity. Science accelerates discovery. Capital preserves what works. Education transmits it. Commons multiply everyone's capabilities. That is the deeper logic of the Western stack: Stable rules + distributed freedom + relentless error correction = cooperation at scale and accelerating innovation.

The patriarchy was invented to protect women from their own stupidity. Not because men hated women. Because female nature, left unchecked, creates this:

Canada is a sovereign country until the land acknowledgement starts.

Fulton Sheen saw the dangers of 'false compassion' coming 50 years ago and called it out loud and clear

How the Conservative Party can win: 1. Propose a huge tax cut 2. 0 foreign aid until our healthcare system is fixed 3. The cultural mosaic is dead. Propose a new pro-Canada vision for how we all deal with each other. Just getting a passport isn’t enough to be Canadian. 4. Develop and promote plan to stop the over reliance of government contracts for Canadian companies. In other words, embrace capitalism. Encourage more companies to exist without govt subsidy/assistance. 5. End equalization or radically improve it. Who cares if some in Quebec don’t like this. The real conservatives who live there will get it. 6. Attack Carney & Liberals on every cultural issue. Every single one. Fire first and aim later. You will offend people but who cares. The outrage merchants get offended for 5 seconds then forget. Plus they already hate conservatives. Canada is so woke. Aggressively Expose this every day. This is low hanging fruit. 7. Be toxic when you need to be. “Elbows up” is the most cynical, anti-Canada election campaign probably in Canadian history. It’s so self destructive. It’s so negative. But IT WORKED. Sometimes politics is toxic. 8. Get busy. Now. Don’t wait until Trump is out of office 9. Zero or near-zero immigration for a long time. Illegals get deported. 10. Drastically slash funding for CBC/media

The world still cries, “Give us Barabbas.” Luke 23:18-25.

I’m supposed to perform the obligatory little ritual now and pretend both versions of this trade debacle deserve equal credibility. I don’t... I believe the Americans. Not because they’re American. Not because politicians suddenly became trustworthy. And certainly not because Donald Trump has been canonized. I believe them because the American account increasingly makes more sense. Greer, Lutnick and Bessent have spoken openly and specifically about what happened. Their accounts have been remarkably consistent. They can discuss the negotiations like people who were actually involved in them, without appearing terrified that an unsupervised adjective might escape and without a teleprompter. Meanwhile, what do Canadians get from our own government? Carefully sterilized language. Vague explanations. Missing specifics. Scripted talking points. Every sentence apparently passed through enough communications people and lawyers to remove any detectable trace of information. We’re being kept in the dark like bloody mushrooms while learning more about Canada’s own trade negotiations from American officials and American media than from the Canadian government supposedly representing us. And somehow we’re not supposed to notice how politically convenient the Canadian version is. We got: 👉🏻 Trump was unreasonable. 👉🏻 Trump changed the deal. 👉🏻 Trump threatened our sovereignty. 👉🏻 Trump forced Canada to walk away. Trump. Trump. Trump. Just keep Canadians sufficiently pissed off at Donald Trump and perhaps nobody asks the considerably more inconvenient question: ❓️ What exactly did Mark Carney walk away from, and why? Because after the Gordie Howe Bridge fiasco, I’m fresh out of complimentary benefit of the doubt. And here’s the part that absolutely reeks, discrediting any appearance of truth told by the liar in chief #MarkCarney... If Carney possesses documentary evidence proving Trump suddenly dumped outrageous, unacceptable demands onto Canada at the eleventh hour, where the hell is it? Seriously. Think about what that evidence would be worth politically. IF Carney had a piece of paper proving Donald Trump screwed Canada, blindsided our negotiators and forced our heroic prime minister to stand up, pound the table and walk away, the Liberal machine wouldn’t quietly tuck that document into a filing cabinet. Are you kidding me? ▪︎ They’d wallpaper Ottawa with the damn thing. ▪︎ They’d hold press conferences about it. ▪︎ They’d wave it around in Parliament. ▪︎ They’d quote it in fundraising emails. ▪︎ They’d buy ads with it. Every friendly pundit in the country would have a laminated copy by breakfast. CBC would probably commission a twelve-part documentary and an interpretive dance. It would be political rocket fuel. Carney could point directly at the evidence and say, See? I stood up to Trump. And considering how desperately this government wants Canadians angry at Trump, they would squeeze every last political drop out of it. Instead, we get: - Words. - Trust us. - Trump did it. - Don't worry about the details. - Just keep your elbows up and direct your anger toward the orange man south of the border. How extraordinarily convenient. And while Canada spends years shrieking about foreign interference, demanding security clearances for opposition leaders and warning us about other countries trying to influence Canadian politics, Canadian politicians seem remarkably comfortable inserting themselves into American partisan politics. Apparently foreign political influence is a mortal threat to democracy when it crosses the border heading north. Heading south? Nothing to see here, carry on. So enough of the carefully packaged Liberal bullshit. Release the negotiating documents. • Show Canadians the American demands. • Show us Canada's demands. • Show us what changed. • Show us when it changed. • Show us exactly what was sitting on that table when Canada walked away. Because if those documents prove Carney's story, his government has every political incentive imaginable to release them, and its quite odd that they haven't. Their continued absence doesn't prove he's lying, but it sure does suggest it! And considering the Americans are providing details while our own government feeds us verbal oatmeal, it sure as hell gives Canadians a reason to stop swallowing everything we're spoon-fed. Mark Carney isn't an oracle. He isn't our father. And Canadians aren't intellectually deficient children who need the PMO to decide which facts we're mature enough to see. Stop telling us whom to hate. Show us what happened. Then we'll decide for ourselves who is full of shit. #cdnpoli

Freeloader Nation: Why America Needs to Cut Off Canada’s Welfare Check for Good (THREAD 🧵) (Thread highlights below) The sheer entitlement radiating from Ottawa is nothing short of comedy, and it is time to dismantle the grand delusion that Canada exists as an equal partner to the United States. Canada is an economic dependent surviving entirely on American generosity, geographic convenience, and endless patience. The Canadian economy is essentially a northern retail outlet clinging to the perimeter of a twenty-eight trillion dollar American powerhouse. Over seventy percent of all Canadian exports go directly into the United States, representing more than thirty percent of Canada's total gross domestic product. If the American border closed for thirty days, Canada would experience immediate financial cardiac arrest. When American trade negotiators adjust tariffs by a single percentage point, provincial premiers across Canada scramble into emergency sessions, the Toronto Stock Exchange convulses, and editorial boards publish panic-stricken essays about national survival. Meanwhile, Canadian imports represent barely one percent of total United States economic output. The entire country of Canada has an economy smaller than Texas, smaller than California, and rapidly getting eclipsed by Florida...

Fairy tales warned us for generations that witches murder children in exchange for demonic power. The stories are true. Our rational scientific world dismissed fairy tales as superstitious allegory. We stopped believing, so the Brides of Satan were allowed to return under the guise of modernist terms like "feminism" and "empowerment." We now see the horrific consequences of ignoring the wisdom of the past. "That's not what witches look like," one might say. But remember, the purpose of a story is to use allusion to dispel illusions. We see the hideous soul of a witch, her true self, on the outside, so that listeners can be warned what happens to someone's soul when they give it to devils. The key characteristic of a witch is a smile, an invitation, an offer of comfort or strength, if only you'll exchange a piece of yourself (for instance a chunk of flesh, aka transition surgery, or a fetus).

We fucked up!! And it's so bad even some women can see it...

🇨🇦🇪🇺 I will condense my many tweets on the subject here: - Europe’s financial and banking system is about to collapse due to insufficient collateral. - The war in Ukraine was meant to collapse Russia and take its resources for the needed collateral. - The war in Ukraine failed, so the EU sent banker Mark Carney to Canada with a mission: break Canada’s ties with the US and bring it into the EU, effectively putting its vast resources under Brussels’ control. - Mark Carney called an election in 2025, expecting to win the majority in Parliament that he would need to accomplish that mission. He initially failed, but then used back doors to achieve that requirement. - Mark Carney has since manufactured a crisis with the US with rhetoric such as “being at war”. - Mark Carney is now talking about linking up Canada with the EU. Folks, you have been played. x.com/atrupar/status/2091933…