I play chess, poker, ultimate frisbee, and folk music.

Austin, TX
Amanda Chang retweeted
This is at the gate, after she, a U.S. citizen, cleared security. Guilty until proven innocent with no due process is how it works under fascism.
Replying to @LongTimeHistory
Additional raw footage from new angle. 👇 This woman is U.S. citizen traveling with her young daughter—according to witness who filmed video. She could not prove her citizenship to satisfaction of the agents—and was violently taken into ICE custody. San Francisco Airport
1,744
3,985
12,300
492,166
Amanda Chang retweeted
I've been doing this for so long that I didn't know I could still be shocked, but I am *genuinely* stunned how many people are lying about Pretti "interfering" or "obstructing," and how many 2A folks are suddenly framing the right to carry as some implicit threat. Shameful.
142
196
1,188
73,467
Amanda Chang retweeted
As a poker community we are so excited anytime a woman makes a run at the main event. It’s the talk of the community and we all root united for her. The rest of the year if any female says anything or does anything with a few exceptions of the top 5-10 highly (deservedly) respected/admired, they get piled on by any one with an account. It’s ok to let females share their perspective on issues even if it might be wrong 🤯. They are coming in this industry with a different past and a different future than many of us. We have chewed up and spit out so many could be rising stars from a personality and player perspective ganging up to immediately explain to them their flaws. Some of the biggest male voices in our industry say stupid stuff on the regular. They promote themselves in ridiculous ways. They are just flat out wrong many times. They are either ignored or have a few back and forth and people forget. They blend back in. Meanwhile women get completely ostracized and run from what might or might not be a promising role in our game. Anyway, when weighing the options of piling on or not maybe take a step back and sit one out every once in a while. Happy Thanksgiving ☮️ ❤️
31
10
190
74,109
I had the pleasure of meeting Danya at a tournament in Charlotte, and what struck me was how much he cared about having a positive impact on his students. He was such a kind and humble person. Thinking of his family and loved ones 💔
The Naroditsky family shares the sad news of Daniel’s unexpected passing. Daniel was a talented chess player, educator, and beloved member of the chess community. We ask for privacy as the family grieves.
6
5
423
11,093
My poker hot take is that bad beat stories aren’t the problem; most poker players are just horrible storytellers 🙃
430
The first time I played Big-O was when I was new to poker and thought “Big-O” was a cute name for a NLH tourney. They dealt me my two cards, and then three more 🤔 “This is Big-O.” “…I don’t know what that is.” “5-card Omaha hi-lo.” “I don’t know any of those words either.”
Share a piece of poker lore about yourself ❤️♦️♠️♣️ I’ll start: one time I was playing a cash game with Don Cheadle at the Commerce, and after a series of probably irresponsible but exciting bluffs, he looked at me and said, “I’m just enjoying the show man”.
5
1
29
7,427
They told me to try to make a wheel; I have four on my car? 🚙 I think I won a pot by accident that day at @LodgePokerClub. But I thought it seemed fun, so I went home and played micro-stakes online. Now it’s my best game 🤓
1
5
529
I, for one, am outraged that transgender mice are eating the neighborhood dogs and cats 😡😿
Just got off the phone with my friend, @NormOrnstein, who explained to me the difference between transgender and transgenic. You see, Trump got a big laugh from the Republicans last night when he said the federal government "spent $8 million to make mice transgender." No, they didn't. They were actually transgenic mice (injected with DNA from another species). That said, I don't think transgenic mice should be allowed to swim competitively against regular mice. Imagine if they were injected with fish DNA!
1
4
755
Amanda Chang retweeted
The last couple years of writing public about politics has affirmed for me the two most toxic kinds of behavior on the left and right. Both are purity testing, but differently. Here is how it goes: On the left, it’s a purity test of thought. I could agree 85% with a lefty on an issue like homelessness, but if I don’t agree on the final 15%, I become the enemy. Sometimes it’s the final 1%, like language around the issue. For instance, I regularly see people on the left criticizing my take on an issue related to homelessness because I don’t use activist language like “the unhoused,” even though I’ve never heard a single shelter worker or homeless person use that language in my reporting. It’s complete and utter nonsense, but it’s a purity test, and I become the enemy even when we agree on everything else I might believe. On the right, it’s a purity test of personality. You absolutely have to love and support the personalities of the Trump-right or else you are out. Even the self-evidently bad ones. For instance, my criticism of Pete Hegseth — an obviously mediocre leader who is unqualified in a million different ways to lead 3 million service members and civilians as defense secretary — is considered out of bounds. All week I’ve had pro-Trump readers in my inbox saying they were unsubscribing or now knew I was a liberal because I was too hard on a guy who made his entire living as a pundit by being a firebrand provocateur, and who has brought controversy and mismanagement to every org he’s worked at. But you aren’t allowed to say so. You can’t criticize charlatans like Vivek or Elon or Don Jr. even when they are being intentionally provocative or over the top. What is MOST interesting about this is that the inverse is totally untrue, also. For instance: Pro-Trump conservatives generally don’t care if I agree only in part with their ideas, they will invite me onto the Trump train. In fact, if I am 10% on board with something Trump says, they welcome me with open arms, and they don’t care at all about the other 90%. They especially don’t care about how I say it. At the same time, liberals don’t give a single shit about criticizing their own leaders. You can spend all day trashing Pelosi, Biden, Harris, Democrats broadly, every Democratic pundit and social media influencer, and they’ll still love you so long as you have perfect alignment with them on the issues or the language. In fact, they often enthusiastically criticize their own party leaders, and encourage others to do so too. It is such a strange, disorienting thing to live between these two political tribes in 2025. And it’s obviously impossible to make everyone happy. But I’ve realized having moderate or someone centrist politics, or even worse (in my case) feeling really strongly aligned with the right and left depending on the issue, you end up on the wrong end of a bunch of venomous, tribalistic, purity-testing partisans at all hours of the day.
73
103
897
148,266
Amanda Chang retweeted
We need an NBA players only Chess tournament, proceeds go to the charity of choice of the winner
POV: You’re playing chess with @wemby on a Saturday morning in Washington Square Park ♟️🗽
1,066
7,145
140,941
8,292,131
Would bring me so much JOY if we could shift the conversation away from telling people to eat less junk food and instead to eat more foods that make them feel better: poultry, fish, vegetables, fruits. People don't need to be told donuts are bad by a shirtless mad man in Smith's
What was once niche is now mainstream in health discussions: clean eating, resistance training, sprints, avoiding blue light at night, sunrise viewing, phthalate avoidance, meditation, breathwork, cold, heat, creatine, microbiome, peptides, clean water etc. Health is a practice.
3
2
17
2,499
Amanda Chang retweeted
Laughing to myself thinking about this block in Florida. It’s like if cartoon gnomes had redlining
130
3,177
84,097
2,115,372
Amanda Chang retweeted
A key point missing in a lot of post debate analysis is that Trump’s claim about immigrants eating pets almost perfectly syncs up to the piano in the Peanuts theme song.
2,095
33,979
232,556
19,422,901
Amanda Chang retweeted
Did you know that ALL female chess grandmasters in history are currently living? Chess is one of the oldest games in the world and the first grandmasters were given that title in 1914- over 100 years ago. The first female grandmaster didn’t come til much later… in 1978. Nona Gaprindashvili, the first woman to become a grandmaster is still alive today. This crazy stat shows how relatively recent women are in the top levels of the sport. A lot of people have discussed the reasons behind this, but more women are playing chess now than ever and hopefully the number will only grow.
17
24
160
13,790
Playing my favorite game on stream today! 😎🃏
Listen up, Big O fans! We're streaming Big O today at @LodgePokerATX! Watch live at 3PM CT!
8
1,305
Amanda Chang retweeted
“What’s it like playing poker as a woman?” 🤔 I’ve gotten asked that question a lot, and have also been informed our brains are biologically different… which makes sense. Here are some key differences I could think of, but ladies feel free to add on if I left anything out! Link to play me: bit.ly/4c1fRai #ignitionpartner #poker
81
75
669
114,592
The LIPS Texas Star Ladies Championship kicks off @theroyalatx in Austin! Our FEATURED LIVE STREAM CASH GAME begins at Noon CST and we'll post the link here and on Social Media links everywhere. The $150 NLHE Kick off tournament starts at 2PM! See you all soon! #lipstour
1
3
5
406
Breaking News: 1600 Rated Chess Player Finds One Fork and Is Reported for Cheating
3
8
919
My opponent is the same rating; crazy that they've never found a one move tactic in their life 🙃
403
Amanda Chang retweeted
That time @MariaHo and I were blocked from entering the @WSOP tournament area because it was "for poker players only" (aka, last week) - or the very real (and persistent) problem of sexism and bias: open.substack.com/pub/mariak…
24
25
128
36,979