Recruiting the next generation of German Applied Science Professors @hs_osnabrueck. Cognitive Scientist, Science Woman, firmly planted between worlds. she / her
Osnabrück, Germany
- Tweets 33,104
- Following 3,062
- Followers 4,565
- Likes 70,776
Returned to #blogging with this long overdue post on the #BuffetApproach to #OpenScience on #CogTales
cogtales.wordpress.com/2023/…
2
23
48
14,160
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Das globale Erwärmungslimit von 1,5 auf 1,0 Grad abzusenken, fordert eine internationale Expertengruppe. Der Meteorologe und ZDF-Moderator Özden Terli erklärt, warum er an der Initiative mitwirkt. @TerliWetter klimareporter.de/erdsystem/m…
8
64
164
7,139
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
I hate making the same mistakes. SO... Since last semester, after every class, I graded myself and kept notes on what did and did not work well. I am teaching one of these classes again this semester and so far, it has been helpful to refer back.
32
59
1,090
191,735
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Interestingly, as we increased the number of trials required for inclusion, test-retest correlations increased somewhat (more trials per kid helps!)- but even the largest correlations were quite small (and likely too small to be practical for studying indiv differences) (4/6)
ALT Figure showing the correlation between infant-directed speech preference in the first and second session for increasingly strict inclusion criteria requiring participants to contribute more trials. Correlations are small when participants must contribute at least 2 or 4 trial pairs (r < .10), but somewhat larger when participants have to contribute at least 6 (r=0.22) or 8 (r=0.34) trial pairs. At the same time, the total sample size gets dramatically smaller
1
1
10
1,014
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
So, as part of ManyBabies1, a number of labs brought in babies for a second test session. Despite a large infant sample (N=158), we saw no evidence of test-retest reliability in preregistered analyses. Correlations between looking time in session 1 and 2 was small (r=.09) (3/6)
ALT Figure showing the correlation between infant-directed speech preference in the first and second test session. There are 8 panels, each showing the correlation for a specific contributing lab and testing method. The correlations vary in their direction, but all correlations are small and non-significant.
2
8
21
3,063
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Test-retest reliability is critical for measuring stable individual differences (e.g. in longitudinal research). But we still know very little about the reliability of looking time measures (see psyarxiv.com/u37fy/ by @Krista_BH @chbergma @VictoriaSavalei) (2/6)
1
3
17
1,707
This is a great opportunity where brilliant folks get together in a fantastic setting at @lorentzcenter. Join if you can!!!
call for participants: B. Nicenboim, M van Vugt and me organized a Lorentz Centre "Cognitive Modeling of Complex behaviour" hands-on workshop in January 24. Check the call and join us (early career especially welcome): lorentzcenter.nl/cognitive-m…
3
442
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
call for participants: B. Nicenboim, M van Vugt and me organized a Lorentz Centre "Cognitive Modeling of Complex behaviour" hands-on workshop in January 24. Check the call and join us (early career especially welcome): lorentzcenter.nl/cognitive-m…
3
24
35
12,172
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
If you want advice on how to eat for your medical condition see a dietitian. If you want to know if your symptoms are linked to food, see your GP. Don’t email people you saw on TV. If they are qualified & professional they won’t give you personal advice over email.
2
3
42
1,854
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Interested in learning more about
👉Biases in research
👉Meta-research
👉Creating reproducible research
Come join us for 5⃣ days of interactive workshops and discussions at the Oxford-Berlin Autumn School
🗓️20-24 Nov
🙋 In-person & 💻 Online
Apply: ox.ukrn.org/events/#2023-11-…
30
48
20,551
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
This study shows how having hyphens in a paper title is linked with lower citation counts across many fields...
but it is also about how arbitrary factors can distort the progress of science, as academic search tools had issues with hyphenated titles, dropping their visibility.
7
30
172
32,793
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
OPUS is inviting #researchers to share their insights on rewarding #OpenScience efforts.
Join the #survey to make your voice heard and contribute to a fairer #ResearchAssessment and reward system.
ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner…
#ResearchInnovation
📷 OPUS is inviting #researchers to share their insights on rewarding #OpenScience efforts. 📷 Join the #survey to make your voice heard and contribute to a fairer #ResearchAssessment and reward system.
ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner…
#ResearchInnovation
3
6
928
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
CS @tudelft is expanding: we are looking for Asst. or Assoc. Professors in (Trustworthy) AI, Distributed/Data Systems, and everything in between.
If you are interested and have questions, drop me an email!
tudelft.nl/ewi/over-de-facul…
12
23
2,790
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Fun fact: in France, Netflix already reports their viewership to writers monthly and pays writers based on that viewership, because it’s the law there. They literally already have this system in place.
Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos is reportedly concerned that if they give a fair deal to writers & actors in the U.S. that it will set a precedent for writers/actors in other territories to ask for fair deals.
(Source: allyourscreens.com/en/compon…)
132
14,768
76,858
5,397,963
These issues are relevant for any research endeavor (yes, I boldly claim that solo science is, at best, extremely rare), but big team science really throws a spot light on our inability to properly deal with team efforts
Cc @BigTeamSciCon @Many_Babies
Our paper on "Team Infrastructure Roles" is now out!
journal.trialanderror.org/pu…
What are TIRs? We define TIRs as specialists who support research, but are outside the typical job positions associated with being a "researcher", like grad student, postdoc, faculty.
/1
1
4
1,250
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
In the paper, we discuss the changing landscape of research and growing demand for teams with broader skillsets, and the (systemic, labor-related) problem of changing needs that aren't followed by changing institutional practices to support the people that fill those needs.
/2
1
2
7
1,009
Dr. Christina Bergmann - Skies are blue... retweeted
Our paper on "Team Infrastructure Roles" is now out!
journal.trialanderror.org/pu…
What are TIRs? We define TIRs as specialists who support research, but are outside the typical job positions associated with being a "researcher", like grad student, postdoc, faculty.
/1
5
16
42
10,080