Just curious:
deleting ~25,000 posts about a stock
@Outlier_999 never ownedβ¦ quoting Law Enforcement advised her π β¦when on the other hand, the entire MMTLP calls are recorded and I worked with the Trustee to SAVE the corporate record from being destroyed.
Dear Sam, for your information and whoever is advising you:
in cases of online harassment, guidance from law enforcement and victim-support authorities consistently emphasizes PRESERVING evidence, not deleting it, precisely because deletions can complicate investigations and chain-of-custody (see references below)
That makes the claim of bulk deletion βper advice of LEβ extremely difficult to square with documented guidance, especially when the deletions involved commentary about stocks you never owned.
Add to that the TIMING, account creation coinciding with the START of regulatory scrutiny and subsequent
#MMTLP trading, the absence of any commentary on the Atlas Trading Group pump-and-dump, and the omission of a basic fact, I never sold a single share.
These are not personal disputes. They are inconsistencies. And when narratives require removing records rather than preserving them, itβs reasonable to ask what purpose that serves.
DYK:
@outlier_999 account was created in 29th September 2021, one month before MMTLP began trading and the SAME month the SEC investigation began (but MMAT only disclosed the SEC part in Nov 2021 with the 10Q)
So the reasonable question isnβt about me. Itβs who is being protected, and why.
Well, the walls are closing in from MULTIPLE places at the same time.
Perhaps Sam has been related to, or dating one of those Atlas boys, or getting paid to troll, or maybe she just needs to check her meds, frankly I couldnβt care lessβ¦
But, βOutlierβ starts to look a lot like OUT-LIAR when the record keeps changing and the evidence keeps disappearing. With respect.
#Discovery
#FINRArule4111 #AML #MarketIntegrity