Wrapped BTC is only as strong as the collateral structure behind it. For institutions, the real questions are reserve separation, rehypothecation, redemption, and verification. cirBTC is designed to meet that standard with 1:1 BTC backing, segregated collateral, real-time onchain proof of reserves, and a neutral issuer model. circle.com/blog/rehypothecat…

Sep 17, 2026 · 7:00 PM UTC

40
34
230
43,164
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @circle
institutions only jumping in when they see that gold standard real collateral always the dealbreaker
2
377
Replying to @circle
Segregated collateral is a good start, but what about some real time transparency into that 1:1 BTC backing?
1
177
Replying to @circle
I see zero risk in Circle.
70
Replying to @circle
Short version: wrapping BTC is what you do when the asset can walk but the garden will not let native BTC through the gate.
2
177
Replying to @circle
reserve separation and clean redemption are the boring details that make this credible
2
144
Replying to @circle
1
49
Replying to @circle
This is the stuff institutions actually care about. 1:1 sounds good, but segregation, redemption, and proof are what make wrapped BTC usable at size.
72
Replying to @circle
We're in for Circle!
12
Replying to @circle
1
119
Replying to @circle
Circle is the best institution there is.
17
Replying to @circle
This proves that Circle really builds system.
13
Replying to @circle
Circle cares
13
Replying to @circle
Great 👍
127
Replying to @circle
@circle always delivers
6
Replying to @circle
Where's ORA the circle dog 🐕
1
94
Replying to @circle
👀
1
84
Replying to @circle
BTC
68
Replying to @circle
✅
1
39