Feminizing Conflict. So if WW3 doesn't happen and Russia does not invade Europe, will social media block and cancel everyone pushing war fear content? Of coarse they won't.

Feminizing Conflict youtube.com/shorts/4F8uPqd8T… via @YouTube

Sorry to burst the bubble of Labour MPs but reading their statements is getting on my wick. These Labour types are still pretending it’s all down to one man’s charisma deficit. It isn’t. Starmer’s just the current passenger in the driving seat of a party that’s spent years treating the British public as an inconvenience to be managed rather than a people to be served. Mass immigration without consent, net zero costs dumped on working households, welfare rules that punish effort and reward dependency, and a cultural elite that sneers at anyone who still believes in borders, sovereignty and common sense. That’s Labour’s record, not some unfortunate glitch under the current management. Swapping the leader changes nothing fundamental. The betrayal is baked into what the party has become. Until enough voters stop falling for the managerial reshuffle routine and back the only force that actually wants to put this country first again, the same failures will keep coming round on a loop.

Hantavirus - cruise ship - and false narratives galore! My scientific and medical opinion as a scientist who did research on Hantavirus is that an inquiry into Dr Bix is warranted Please share massively - accurate info - 1. First and foremost we studied Hantavirus in my lab for many many years and published about it.. so what follows is ACCURATE by someone who did THIS! It is a zoonosis, monitored by many Defense depth, and I was one of those army scientific officers (I was CSO of BE DoD actually, not the copy machine guy!) Type my name and Hantavirus... and you'll see, non classified peer-review research. 2. This woman (Dr Birx) is ‘guilty as charged’ because she was one of the architects of the SARS2 debacle where she forced with her friend (prof Neil Fergusson, Imperial College, London) the policy of ZERO-Covid aka as a suppression policy ZERO covid for a zoonosis? It was NOT possible, not even a policy.. only a ploy to bring about a technology that was NOT ready to the market (RNA vaccines). One can NEVER eradicate (= zero covid) a zoonosis when 600 + mammalian species (cattle, all our pets, zoo animals, deers,... even minks...) share a virus with us and may play 'ping-pong' - that is getting it from us, and giving it back to us! 3. Now she is at it again with the same old LIES and misconceptions Hantaviruses, human-to-human contamination is very rare! 1 - For the EU strains, one gets infected crawling in the woods, and literally inhaling rodent poop/urine (a bit like snorting coke LOL) -The operational army personnel is at risk because that is part of their training and job! - It has essentially no lethality... but one can get sick, and can get complications IF NOT TREATED, like a bacterial colonization of our lungs 2 - For the US Strains (sin Nombre, Andes), there is a slight increase in human-human transfer. - but it remains RARE, - and requires continuous contact with SYMPTOMATIC people for a while like in a family, or like in a CONFINED room with the HVAC of that cruise ship for exemple (where they kept people in THEIR CABINS for a while - which was the ultimate STUPIDITY!) - just passing by someone who coughs or giving a hug - like in the case of a flu, will NOT do it. - mortality nearly only when NON treated.. that is an important point- very important. Why NO PCR to find out? The PCR testing can NEVER b used for a fishing trip. Its is because - and it is known for age- , it has a very low PRE-test predictive value. After SYMPTOMS however, in order to ascertain and/or to differentiate between different pathogens, it is perfectly legit So systematic PCR will just create FAKE cases, like the 80% false positives obtained for SARS2 during COVID Contagion? Hantaviruses have a long incubation period ( a few weeks) but CAN only be contagious with symptoms.... This appear fun general after 15-18 days on average, and are FLU-like. So before any SYMPTOM -> NO contagion Vaccines? NO matter what they tell you, Hantaviruses are ZOONOSIS - so offering a mass protection (useless as I just explained) via a vaccine is - USELESS - INEFFECTIVE... This is true for ANY zoonosis. Because to really mitigate such transmission, vaccinating humans ONLY would be useless! So vaccines NON needed, and besides especially NOT those RNA-based ones Treatments exist! - First of all, we have -when confronted with symptoms- treat those.. like for any flu-like syndrome - if and when bacterial surinfection arises, antibiotics are in order - HANTA-specific molecules do also exist - Ribavirin is an enzyme blocker of the enzyme of the hantavirus... But there is BETTER! ANY medication/drug which interferes with the acidification of late endosomes will PREVENT hanta to reach the biochemical interior of the cell ... and here we find HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE (HCQ) - yep! and it has been published See here: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Biology pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… Chloroquine, an Anti-Malaria Drug as Effective Prevention for Hantavirus Infections The author list is Ironic - this come in tempore non suspecto from a lab of one Birx Friends - also responsible for the SARS2 debacle in EU and in Belgium :) And i want you all to understand the next sentence. This bug is a NON PROBLEM (see image below), it is pure media manipulation In Belgium - for example - we have each year between 150 and 350 cases of Hantavirus patients. We do not loose them, and NO one has ever heard about it.. because it is a NON problem! In the US, with the ANDES strain... one has more chances to die from a lightning strike than for an Hantavirus infection.. in the US roughly 30 cases a year and 10 deaths, lightning strikes 20 deaths per year and several hundred 'cases" per year too. (And no.. GoF research of this germ is not an easy act... it is NOT a new Hanta, the serology, not the PCR, will prove it...) So i hereby request that an inquiry into Dr Birx statements be made, her full list of conflicts be researched, and that HHS refers her to DOJ for the spread of FALSE information, with ill intent .. as outlined in this post. Prof dr Martin ZIZI, MD-PhD former CSO BE DoD former UN bioweapon inspector @RFKJr_Official @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay

🚨BREAKING: UN officials have warned that the United Nations faces total financial collapse as a result of "non-payment of dues by member states". "We face a real danger of running out of money." What's your response to this......??👀 MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏.

Dr. John Campbell - Hantavirus conspiracies 1. *oderna work on a jab in 2004 2. the virus is a reported adverse event after a convid jab.

Congratulations. You have reached Level 3.

Some in the West are assuming Russia will sign a fantasy peace deal for Ukraine that would be inferior to Russian sovereignty. Why and how?

One problem with the BBC implying President Trump incited J6 is that it's the same false playbook beltway and 'security' officials have been using. J6 was a set up.

European elites worst nightmare could be that Russia wins in Ukraine but does not invade any NATO country, exposing the weak narrative.

So weird I'm beginning to think it's actually him writing them.

How come @GBNEWS TV report storms in the Caribbean instead of the SMO in Ukraine? - which UK taxpayers have spent untold billions on? The Russian's have had a break-through, isn't that newsworthy? Ukraine used to be on mainstream news all the time.

Reading fiction Utopia, by a Sir, written c. 1515, he talks about a licence to travel (within a country) and a limit on the time to return. Despite Magna Carta 1215 supporting individual freedoms, including travel. So some dystopian ideas have been around longer than I thought.

Can anyone think of 5 Western politicians who can declare publicly that Ukraine cannot and will not win this SMO in Ukraine? I can't. This might be why the losing side cannot negotiate or surrender - political optics and errors made.

What if the end of war in Ukraine came at the cost of the reputations of nearly all European politicians? Would it be worth it?

It doesn't seem very scientific to take something where the long term consequences are unknown to science.

Would a govt confirming govt is corrupt be corruption? Wouldn't citizens have to decide for themselves ultimately?

🤣🤣🤣 So at last we can see clear water between you, Greens and Lab: Greens - Farage's a fascist You - Farage's a socialist Lab - We're not saying he's racist BUT Hitler Youth LieDems - let's all skip down the park and play on the swings, but not with those nasty Trumpy big boys