Says the man who couldnt think of a decent post

There is no AI bubble

Marketing and engagement hype

My weather at the moment. You can just hold your horses and wait

both of you stop! either you are both Talentless losers, or neither of you are and i don't personally believe either of you are both of you stop acting like 3 year old children fighting over a cookie

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you poor thing you are such a sheeple you follow along with whatever bandwagon comes along, you don't think for yourself. you read something online or hear something in the media and glom right onto it i feel sorry for you, but only slightly

coffee and donuts waiting for you when you finish ;)

you know - it has never been a good idea to stick yourself into a single career if AI wasn't taking your job, your job could end because of thousands of other reasons people that have bought into the idea they should focus on one skill set to the exclusion of all else have always had a problem

i tell people that AI models learn in the same way they do - by learning concepts, etc and that if it's wrong for AI then it's wrong for them, and to pay up for all the stuff they've stolen

everyone as in all 8 billion + people on the planet?

ensouled? the word soul means being, living creature - and applies to everything from worms to humans go research the actual original word the word ensouled is redundant because very obviously they are living creatures, beings however i'm going to ask are you conscious and self-aware?

will you now? would you rather i just loaded the utah teapot, took the lid off for a hat, made a ring of the pot with spout sticking out, put that on a pre-made 3d female mesh and posed it like you did? or would you like to wait for my agent to finish working on it?

no one is going to give up their dreams what's sad is that you think you can manipulate other people into doing things the way YOU want done now THAT might discourage people they could be sitting there going "oh! finally! something I can actually create with, i can make stuff with, that works for ME!" and you come along and look at them and go "loser! if you don't create the way I SAY you have to, then you can't create. go jump off a bridge"

it matters to the individual that's using it, @IsThisA3DModel - it should not matter to anyone else stop focusing on the tools being used and start actually looking at the content and more than that unless you, in your life offline, do not create at all - maybe you just push carts for walmart - how about creating stuff WITH posting it on your IsThis account and at least showing the world your creativity in a positive manner the other Teapot characters on the interview page are very cool we never get to see any of your work

most of the general public just who do you think you are? Ego, much, paul? take your nasty little self and go stand it in a corner until you learn what your mother apparently didn't teach you - how to have manners

here's a better shocker opus 5.5 is a check point model - a set of files of nothing but numbers. it is NOT THE AI it is CLAUDE doing this. and you are allowing claude to use opus 5.5 as its engine you want to see what opus 5.5 can do by itself? remove it from the pipeline stick it on your machine poke at it with a stick it'll do nothing it is CLAUDE, the actual AI, using Opus, that is doing this newsflash - claude can do the same thing with sonnet as the engine

the anti and pro both go that route, not just one or the other and both are missing is exactly what you said. Art is the ACTION of a human expression creativity in some way and that way doesn't have to be something that's socially acceptable, nice, or anything else. but if a human - (and only humans, not cows, dogs, other animals, machines, etc) - is expressing creativity by that action, that's the human making art

those are all valid statements the answer to all is because you want to

Ha ha this one was great 😊 @grok did a great job matching the aspect ratios for the comic panels, breakfast is saved! 🩵 🥣 🍳 🍞 ✨

nope and since you didn't bother to do any research, photography is LEGAL here: buildings can be copyrighted as Architectural Works. How Copyright Applies to Buildings Original designs: Under U.S. law (effective December 1, 1990), an original building design—whether shown in blueprints, models, or the constructed structure itself—receives automatic copyright protection. Ownership: The architect or designer who creates the plans typically owns the copyright, not the client who pays for the building or the contractor who builds it. Limitations: Protection only covers the overall creative form and arrangement of spaces, not standard building components (like basic windows or doors) or functional elements dictated by building codes. Buildings constructed before December 1, 1990, are generally not protected under this law. Taking Photos and Videos Public view: Y ou are legally allowed to take photos, paint, or film any building as long as the structure is visible from a public place, without needing permission from the copyright owner. Private property: Photographers can still run into trouble if they trespass onto private property to capture their images.