Triathlon and ultra-endurance (these days I bike a lot), food lover, DINKWAD. @USCMarshall @airbnb ex @amazon, Substack: realab.blog/

Los Angeles, CA
Davide Proserpio retweeted
𝗟𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗙𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 If you’re in STEM and exploring a transition into AI research, please consider joining us to push the frontier of intelligence systems! 𝗙𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽: perplexity.ai/hub/research/f… 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: jobs.ashbyhq.com/Perplexity/…
1
3
10
699
Davide Proserpio retweeted
I’m once again on the program committee for the Workshop on Platform Analytics (WoPA), taking place April 2–3 at UC San Diego this upcoming year. It’s a great workshop, and I encourage anyone working on platforms to submit a paper! The submission deadline is December 6, 2026. platformanalytics.org/
2
11
777
PhD was my backup option :)
Students sometimes tell me they’re applying to PhD programs as a backup in case they don’t get a job as a software engineer or whatever. I get that the job market is rough but this is like saying you’ll start a company if you don’t find a job. Like starting a company, a PhD is the far *more* risky path and requires incredible grit over a long period. It isn’t just that you might realize after a couple of years that a PhD isn’t for you. The bigger risk is that you complete a PhD but end up overqualified on a niche topic after having spent 5-7 years on it. The research world, like acting, sports, music, or book publishing, is set up as a tournament, with lots of extremely competent people competing for a small number of highly desirable slots. We can talk about whether that’s fair and whether it’s inherent or can be changed, but as a professor I feel the least I can do is loudly and repeatedly warn people about what they’re getting into.
2
332
Worst post of the century
EU pizza market is oversaturated with Neapolitan style. Some might consider this blasphemy but New York or Detroit style are superior. Who’s building this?
136
New substack from R.E.A.L.: Downtown Chicago office employment GREW 10.8% between 2019 and 2023 — from 359,000 to 398,000 jobs. However, downtown L ridership is still down 35%. These two facts are hard to reconcile, so we looked at the station level. Chicago has published daily turnstile counts for all 143 L stations since 2001, which we merged with Census LODES data on where jobs sit, block by block. The stations surrounded by the most office jobs are running at 58% of their 2019 traffic. The stations with the least office exposure are at 70%. A 12-point gap, on the same rail system, in the same downtown, in the same year. This isn't a story about jobs leaving the Loop. The jobs are still there. The people holding them are showing up two or three days a week instead of five, and that shortfall lands on everything downstream of the turnstile: lunch counters, transit fare revenue, ground-floor retail, and property assessments. Full analysis: realab.blog/p/what-urban-rai…
2
316
Davide Proserpio retweeted
FYI, I've finished my year at Amazon and am visiting Stanford @DigEconLab for the year. If you're on campus and interested in the intersection of AI and markets let me know.
2
9
125
5,095
Economists: totally fine with RAs and predocs providing substantial assistance on a paper without being coauthors. Also economists: using AI to help with the writing is unacceptable.
4
149
Davide Proserpio retweeted
Dear Econ community, I have a favour to ask. If you teach one of my papers in your courses, or include it in a reading list, could you please let me know? DM/email/comment. Thank you! 🙏
9
30
6,374
Davide Proserpio retweeted
Excited to be co-organizing @CODEConference again this year Nov. 13-14 at MIT! Submissions due Sept. 13. We’re especially keen on work on new metrics for complex/AI products, methods for uncovering causal mechanisms, and experiment design under "treatment abundance." Links 👇
1
7
15
1,528
Davide Proserpio retweeted
Pretty big break happening in academia between the “AI is banned for reviews” journals and the “AI is mandatory for reviews” journals.
We’re proud to announce that Refine has signed partnerships with two leading publishers in economics. Both the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society now use Refine’s AI-assisted technical verification as part of their publication processes. 1/
34
57
525
69,385
This is happening so fast! Had some thoughts a couple of months ago about where we are headed and what it means for the review system currently in place: realab.blog/p/some-thoughts-…
We’re proud to announce that Refine has signed partnerships with two leading publishers in economics. Both the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society now use Refine’s AI-assisted technical verification as part of their publication processes. 1/
2
486
Even if the criticism of Refine was unfair, publicly criticizing Rohan's paper in retaliation was completely unnecessary.
2
17
1,773
Waiting for LLMs to solve the P vs. NP problem in a few days.
1
208
🚨🚨 New REAL post 🚨🚨 A Metro-by-Metro Measure of the U.S. Housing Supply-Demand Gap The U.S. housing shortage is not one national problem. Using ACS data from 2019–2024, we measure the housing gap metro by metro. Across 105 large growing metros, new supply covered only ~85% of new household growth. realab.blog/p/a-metro-by-met…
119
Messi's vision of the game is impressive.
110
Davide Proserpio retweeted
Really excited about this!
Out today in @HarvardBiz, my new technical vision with @raulcfernandez of how to make markets for pretraining data work: hbr.org/2026/06/how-ai-compa…
1
3
502
Economists checking whether other economists' writing is AI-generated is (another) low point for the profession.
1
156
Davide Proserpio retweeted
🚨 New working paper 🚨 We looked at what happened to foreign sellers on Etsy after the U.S. suspended duty-free de minimis exemption in 2025.
2
3
13
675
New working paper with Pengxiang (Shawn) Zhou and @GoliAlii : "LLMs as Gatekeepers: Source Concentration, Factual Quality, and Political Slant in Information Search." (dadepro.github.io/papers/llm…) More and more, people ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, or Grok instead of searching. That means these tools increasingly decide which news outlets and media sources people actually see. Focusing on the news and media ecosystem, we looked at how AI compares to regular search — and what happens as publishers start blocking AI crawlers. A few things we found: 1. AI platforms send traffic to a far more concentrated set of sources than organic search (3–8× higher HHI), but currently of higher average factual quality and comparable political slant. 2. The publishers blocking AI crawlers are disproportionately the largest, most factually reliable, and centrist-to-left outlets. Their exit shifts the available pool toward higher concentration, lower factual quality, and rightward slant. 3. Blocking Perplexity's crawler cuts a domain's referral traffic by 46–48%. That traffic flows back to the largest remaining outlets, reinforcing concentration rather than diluting it. 4. The result: redistribution reinforces concentration while failing to undo the shift toward less factual and more right-leaning publishers.
1
5
426