Congratulation @McIlroyRory You Deserve it to win @BBCSport Personality of the year 2025 You can trade polymarket on @TradePolyBot , click here : t.me/TradePolyBot?start=ref_…

Fuck you and look aster-2:native price compare to $HYPE

1/ @Plasma One publicly launched 100 days ago. Since then, it has processed over $60.8M in card spend, onboarding tens of thousands of active users and drawing in over 3.5% of the circulating XPL supply. Here's how adoption has developed:

Called 120k the top and 60k next At 60k I said 40-50k is coming I revised and said bottom is in Started buying big at 60-64k Called the start of the bull at 60k Gave the target of $88,000 Few weeks later $88,000 got hit Now I’m expecting $79,000 next

BREAKING: President Trump has rejected Iran’s proposal for a 7-day ceasefire and has told aides he expects to begin bombing Iran after the November midterms, per WSJ. Iran’s proposal would have reopened the Strait of Hormuz and resumed nuclear talks in return for the US lifting its blockade of Iranian ports. Trump is reportedly skeptical Iran will meet his demands and has told his staff that he sees a renewed bombing campaign as likely. Today marks day 209 of the Iran War.

Despite my frequent criticism of $XPL price, the plasma card is actually very decent. Been using it for the past few months and love it so far.

It's official. As the bond market "meltdown" accelerates, the average interest rate on a 30Y mortgage in the US is up to 7.45%. That's up +150 basis points in 6 months and the highest since 2023, when inflation was at 6.4%+. What is happening? Let us explain. (a thread)

#Hyperliquid may be on track to become #FTX 2.0. The way it handled the $JELLY incident was immature, unethical, and unprofessional, triggering user losses and casting serious doubts over its integrity. Despite presenting itself as an innovative decentralized exchange with a bold vision, Hyperliquid operates more like an offshore CEX with no KYC/AML, enabling illicit flows and bad actors. The decision to close the $JELLY market and force settlement of positions at a favorable price sets a dangerous precedent. Trust—not capital—is the foundation of any exchange (CEX and DEX alike), and once lost, it’s almost impossible to recover. Moreover, the platform's product design reveals alarming flaws: mixed vaults that expose users to systemic risk, and unrestricted position sizes that open the door to manipulation. Unless these issues are addressed, more altcoins may be weaponized against Hyperliquid—putting it at risk of becoming the next catastrophic failure in crypto.

Info A1: Guys BlackRock baru aja rilis laporan yang bilang AI agent bisa bikin adopsi kripto meledak! Wah kok bisa? Sini mimin jelasin pake bahasa anak bayi 👶 Jadi AI agent itu sederhananya adalah AI yang bisa ngerjain tugas sendiri tanpa harus terus-terusan disuruh manusia. Misalnya ada AI yang ditugasin bikin sebuah video. Dia bisa cari data sendiri, bayar akses ke AI lain, sewa penyimpanan cloud, sampai bayar layanan yang dia butuhin buat nyelesaiin tugasnya. Masalahnya, kalau AI harus bayar Rp100, Rp500, bahkan kurang dari itu setiap kali pakai layanan tertentu, masa iya tiap transaksi harus nunggu manusia buka mobile banking dan pencet transfer? Kelamaan bos! 🗿 Nah, di sinilah use case stablecoin kepake. Stablecoin bisa diprogram buat melakukan pembayaran otomatis, jalan 24/7, prosesnya cepet, dan cocok buat transaksi kecil yang dilakukan berkali-kali. Artinya, makin banyak AI yang bisa kerja sendiri, makin banyak juga AI yang harus bisa bayar sendiri. Dan ini yang bikin thesis BlackRock menarik. Bukan soal orang tiba-tiba FOMO beli kripto. Tapi soal jutaan AI agent yang suatu hari mungkin saling beli data, bayar layanan, akses API, atau transaksi dengan AI lain tanpa campur tangan manusia. Makin banyak AI agent → makin banyak pembayaran otomatis → makin besar kebutuhan sistem pembayaran yang bisa bekerja seperti mesin. Dan stablecoin + blockchain punya karakter yang cocok buat kebutuhan itu. Jadi, adopsi kripto ke depan mungkin bukan cuma datang karena manusia makin banyak yang beli. Tapi karena mesin makin banyak yang butuh. BlackRock sendiri bilang ini masih early stage. Tapi kalau salah satu manajer aset terbesar dunia sudah mulai serius nulis soal AI yang transaksi pakai blockchain... Kayaknya narasi ini layak mulai diperhatiin 👀 Gimana menurut kalian? *NFA, DYOR!

Terakhir 10Y yield naik segini tinggi.. Bitcoin naik 70% non-stop. 🤔

1/ Huge respect for Dragonfly continuing to invest in the bear market. But I'm morally obliged to call out sketchy projects gaining momentum. As a community we must preempt large scale implosions like #FTX or #LUNA that set the industry back years Bitget may be the next FTX 🧵

[SECURITY NOTICE] Bitget Hot Wallet Incident — September 24, 2026 At 18:31 UTC on September 24, 2026, Bitget's security systems detected unauthorized transfers from some of our hot wallets. Our security team activated emergency response protocols immediately. What we have confirmed: -Estimated funds affected: approximately $351.6 million -Cold wallets remain fully secure. Bitget operates a three-tier wallet architecture — the breach contained only a portion of the hot wallet and warm wallet layers. -User funds are safe. The full amount of this loss falls within the coverage of Bitget's User Protection Fund, which currently holds over $464 million Actions we have taken: -Emergency response team activated within minutes of detection -Abnormal transfer addresses identified, flagged, and reported -Withdrawals temporarily suspended as a precautionary measure, pending security review -Law enforcement and on-chain security firms have been formally notified and are engaged What this means for you: -Your account balances are accurate and your assets are protected -Deposits and trading remain fully operational Withdrawals are temporarily paused and will be restored as soon as the security review is complete -What comes next: We will provide updates on an hourly basis across this channel and all official platforms. A full incident report — including root cause analysis and corrective actions — will be published within 24 hours. We will not speculate on the attack vector until the investigation is complete. Bitget has navigated multiple market cycles. We will not run from this. Every dollar and every decision will be accounted for, transparently and in full. Updates will be posted here and across all official Bitget channels as they become available. — Gracy Chen, CEO, Bitget

JUST IN: Bitget crypto exchange confirms over $350,000,000 stolen following major hack.

JUST IN: Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino says $USDT on Bitcoin is coming.

BREAKING: Institutional investors bought +$4.1 billion in US equities in the week ending September 18th. This marks their 3rd weekly purchase over the last 4 weeks. As a result, the 4-week average of institutional purchases rose to +$2.9 billion. At the same time, hedge funds purchased +$1.2 billion, bringing their 4-week average of purchases up to +$1.6 billion. Meanwhile, retail investors sold -$2.2 billion last week, posting their 8th consecutive weekly sale. Retail investors have now sold an average of -$1.9 billion in US equities per week over the last 4 weeks. Institutions are buying while retail is selling.

nailed it re $xpl i think plasma team have a few aces up their sleeves to surprise the market with tbh relock their tokens, sort out tokenomics generally, announce or hint toward value accrual to the token, etc could get volatile tomorrow so stay away from leverage, but im staying long + strong + will hold through whatever vol comes

A year of Plasma in numbers - $2B in stablecoins on mainnet day one - #5 chain by stablecoins two weeks later, ahead of Base and Arbitrum - #2 @aave market within 4 days, still #4 a year later - $7.5B+ traded on its DEXs since launch - $115.7M in Crypto Card spend settled on the chain - 170K sign-ups on Plasma One - $68M spent with the card - $27M+ held in balances and Earn today, the most ever - 900+ wallets locked XPL for Platinum - $1.5M+ paid out in XPL cashback Partners this year: @tether, @raincards, @deel, @whop and Priority Pass From mainnet to a money app in one year. Congrats @Plasma

🟣 The $XPL debate almost always comes down to the September 25 unlock. So on our side, we decided to look at the data around Plasma One, the main driver behind XPL demand today. Since its launch on June 17, the neobank has recorded: ▫️ 165,692 users with 58,257 activated accounts ▫️ $66.3M in cumulative card volume ▫️ +20.9% volume over 30 days, one of the strongest growth rates among crypto cards This acceleration is partly driven by a wave of cashback offers on the app, with up to 20% on Dyson, among others. Enough to encourage daily use rather than remaining just another crypto card. This adoption directly benefits XPL through the different tiers and the token lock. To access the card's top tiers, you have to lock XPL, 100,000 ($9,500 at the current price) for the Platinum tier, for 12 months. As a result, every premium user mechanically removes tokens from circulation. Today, that's: ▫️ 91.3M XPL locked, or 3.3% of the circulating supply (96% Platinum, 4% Core) ▫️ 880 Platinum wallets and 161 Core wallets ▫️ +36% growth in locked XPL over the past month With no buyback in place, Plasma One is currently just about the only source of XPL demand beyond validator staking, which is still closed to the general public, and network fees that amount to a few cents today. The more the card is adopted, the more it reduces the circulating supply. One last point deserves attention: the cashback. Since launch, @Plasma has distributed 18M XPL ($1.7M at the current price) through its cashback program. Logically, this distribution is seen as additional selling pressure on the token. But in reality, two elements completely change the picture: ▫️ Only 58.8% of the distributed cashback is actually sold (41.2% is kept) ▫️ More importantly, this cashback doesn't come from new XPL emissions, but from tokens bought back by Plasma from investors, which directly reduces future unlocks. The $XPL launch sparked real euphoria in the middle of a bear market, but the token has since struggled to find any bullish momentum. Tomorrow's unlocks are probably already priced in, but they could still weigh on sentiment and on the price, even with the token buybacks from investors. As for Plasma One, it's still finding its footing and building real utility for the token. The neobank is only a first step in that direction, but it's probably the most promising one.

plasma:native is 2 days away from one of the largest / most extreme unlocks in crypto history (by share of float) ~65% of current float is being unlocked via team + investor allocations I believe it's largely priced in, here's what i'm looking at chart wise: we have a 2 month inside bar. these are powerful reversal set ups especially on such a high time frame. whether we get a big wick down or not, it's anyone's guess. but i think price starts marking up when the big scary unlock is in the rear view mirror if we do get a big wick down, it'll set the stage for a potential inside bar *false break down* - which is my favourite kind of inside bar reversal set up we still haven't heard anything more regarding token value accrual since the podcast clip went viral months ago... about there being no plasma equity. no equity means the XPL token is the only way to bet on plasma's success. i think they're planning some big news post unlock... time will tell

China’s oil imports from Iran are collapsing: China imported ~6.9 million barrels of crude oil per day in the first 20 days of September, near its lowest level in 10 years. This is well below the ~10.5 million barrels per day China imported on average before the Iran War. At the same time, Chinese imports of Iranian crude dropped to ~80,000 barrels per day, on track for the 2nd-lowest level in at least 10 years. This is down -92% to -95% from the 1.0 to 1.5 million barrels per day imported before the war. As a result, China has imported ~600 million fewer barrels of seaborne oil this year than it would have if it had maintained 2025 import levels. China is also partially replacing Iranian crude with oil from Iraq, the UAE, Brazil, and Canada. Iranian oil is disappearing from China’s import mix.

Debate on cause of rise of the long term bond yields: Two models, both produced by economists affiliated with the Fed: 1) ACM (it’s all real yields/growth/ppl expect Fed to hike) 2) KM (it is term premium) Warsh picked the former interpretation. As did the rest of the FOMC, implied in the SEP More than a year ago, debate on whether tariffs would generate persistent vs transitory inflation: Two models also from Fed affiliated economists: 1) tariffs generate persistent inflation (new research) 2) tariffs deflationary in the long term, and initially a one off price change (from a long standing structural model that proved to be correct in 2018) The FOMC adopted the first interpretation, until facts showed otherwise today. Tell me that economics is not a dismal science. At least the Fed should debate about this, disagree. That is not what the SEP show. Group think is rearing its ugly head inside the Fed again.