OK,
@benonwine - We have been live in court for the whole trial & had to keep explaining this to quite a few other people, here’s the simple legal explanation for you, so you won’t have to ask again, don’t worry, there absolutely is no Rat to smell here, whatsoever
Because, simplyonce Mohammed Fahir Amaaz was convicted, the legal position fundamentally changed.
Remember, under UK law, the presumption of innocence applies only until conviction.
The moment a guilty verdict is returned, that presumption falls away, and the defendant is no longer treated as an “accused person” but as a convicted offender.
This has significant implications for bail and sentencing, particularly where there are still unresolved charges or a retrial on outstanding matters.
At this stage, the trial judge has complete discretion to either:
•Pass sentence immediately on the counts for which conviction has been secured; or
•Adjourn sentencing to allow any further hearings or retrials to be concluded first.
However, crucially, there is no entitlement to bail after conviction. The Bail Act 1976 gives the court power to remand a convicted defendant in custody, especially where the likely sentence is one of immediate imprisonment and could exceed the time it would take to complete any retrial or other outstanding matters.
This matters here because, unlike during the trial stage, Amaaz is no longer cloaked in the protections of innocence. He has been found guilty of serious assaults, including attacks on police officers acting in the course of their duty. The court is now dealing with an individual who has been proven guilty of offences carrying significant custodial sentences.
As such, the risk to public safety, the seriousness of the offences, and the need to ensure he is available for any further proceedings all weigh heavily in favour of continued remand.
The judge can therefore quite properly decide not to release Amaaz pending any retrial. Indeed, this is common practice where the offences are serious, involve public servants, and where custody is almost inevitable on sentence.
It is a clear example of why the loss of the presumption of innocence is so critical: once a person has been convicted, the law views them not as someone awaiting judgment, but as someone awaiting sentence.
Hope this clears things up for the future, when we will be Live in Court when the retrial starts, follow us & switch on notifications us live coverage, as it happens.
@UKCourtsLive ⚖️