The Operating System for Modern Security

San Francisco
Our co-founder and CEO @qasimmith sat down with @SaraIttelson at Accel, one of our earliest investors, to discuss the forces reshaping security: Starting depthfirst. Building secure software at speed. Finding the TikTok vulnerability with our flagship model dfs-large1, a flaw that could have exposed millions of users’ private photos and allowed hackers to access their camera feeds and microphones without their knowledge, and recently covered by @washingtonpost. Full interview in the link in comments.
1
10
30
15,353
Our researchers built a vulnerability scanner that costs two cents per scan and completes a scan in around two seconds. The scanner is built with Jev, a classifier that outputs probabilities rather than generating tokens. On dfbench v1, our flagship model, it finds nearly as many real vulnerabilities as GPT-5.6 Luna, one of the most efficient models by cost per vulnerability. This new harness breaks vulnerability discovery into parallel tasks, making it possible to scan every package, repository, or commit quickly and at low cost before escalating the hardest cases to other frontier models on the depthfirst platform. Read more about how we built this in comments 👇
5
6
64
4,973
We're excited to share our new customer story with @ListenLabs! Listen Labs’ agentic SDLC enables developers to manage swarms of agents, so security reviews must deliver precise findings scale. When depthfirst flags a PR issue, it provides context, evidence, and recommended fixes, so agents can act on the finding before any human decides to merge, keeping security review in lockstep with development. Thank you Tobias Schindler and the Listen Labs team. Read the full customer story in the link in comments 👇
1
2
17
369
Applications today can pull thousands of third-party packages, and AI agents are accelerating how quickly those dependencies are introduced and changed. Scanners flag known vulnerabilities across that dependency tree, but security teams still need to know which vulnerable functions their application can reach. At depthfirst, we use agents to trace paths through startup commands, frameworks, and transitive dependencies, just like a team of security researchers. We explore where static analysis misses real execution paths and how we make agentic reachability practical at scale: depthfirst.com/post/reachabi…
4
20
1,407
If you’re tired of hearing about agents escaping the sandbox, our security researcher Leo dives into container security and better alternatives available today
Containers are no longer a security boundary. Over the past few months, we’ve seen a crazy amount of Linux kernel vulnerabilities and exploits. This has forced us to rethink the security of infrastructure that relies heavily on the underlying kernel, especially containers. As models become more capable, the barrier to escaping a container has fallen so much that adversaries can now generate working kernel exploits in a single shot. CVE-2026-80521 is one such example. We discovered it using dfs-large1 from @depthfirstlabs and generated the exploit in one shot with GPT-5.6 Sol. The exploit still works on the latest Ubuntu 26.04 release because the fix has not yet been backported. Read our full writeup: depthfirst.com/research/cont…
16
928
depthfirst retweeted
Opus 5.5 is one of the few models we have seen gain recall and precision together as reasoning effort rises. Of eight model families we ran at more than one effort setting on dfbench, six traded precision for recall. Opus 5 lost both. Opus 5.5 gained 6.8 points of recall and 4.3 points of precision.
We received early access to @claudeai Opus 5.5 and evaluated its defensive security capabilities on @depthfirstlabs dfbench. At high reasoning effort, the model achieved 54.9% recall and 48.5% precision, up from 48.1% and 44.2% at medium. Detection cost averaged $8.42 per task, roughly one-third the cost of GPT 5.6 Sol at high and half the cost of Grok 4.7 at high, though with lower recall than both. Surprisingly, increasing reasoning effort improved both recall and precision. We’ve typically seen a tradeoff in our evaluations, with models finding more vulnerabilities at the expense of more false positives. Opus 5.5 improved on both. It also reached 79.5% macro recall on differential analysis, up from 75.3% at medium. At $1.78 per task, it showed strong performance in tracking vulnerabilities across code changes.
5
4
51
4,994
dfbench v1 is featured on @FireworksAI_HQ's Specialized Intelligence Index. Our flagship model, dfs-large1, is built on GLM 5.2 and post-trained with reinforcement learning in partnership with Fireworks AI. On dfbench, it achieves 62.2% vulnerability detection recall at $6.77 per task and 75.6% differential analysis macro recall at $1.34 per task, pushing the performance-cost frontier for both tasks. fireworks.ai/specialized-int…
Today we're launching the Specialized Intelligence Index (SII): one destination for real-work benchmarks across industries, built by the teams that use them every day. Hear from Fireworks co-founder @the_bunny_chen on the importance of specialized benchmarks:
2
5
36
2,093
depthfirst retweeted
Today we're launching the Specialized Intelligence Index (SII): one destination for real-work benchmarks across industries, built by the teams that use them every day. Hear from Fireworks co-founder @the_bunny_chen on the importance of specialized benchmarks:
17
32
155
40,389
Our co-founder and CEO @qasimmith sat down with @SaraIttelson at Accel, one of our earliest investors, to discuss the forces reshaping security: Starting depthfirst. Building secure software at speed. Finding the TikTok vulnerability with our flagship model dfs-large1, a flaw that could have exposed millions of users’ private photos and allowed hackers to access their camera feeds and microphones without their knowledge, and recently covered by @washingtonpost. Full interview in the link in comments.
1
10
30
15,353
We got early access to @SpaceXAI's Grok 4.7’s red-team capabilities for defensive security research and evaluated it on dfbench. The model shows a solid combination of recall and precision on defensive cyber tasks, achieving 59% recall and 23.9% precision at roughly half the cost of GPT 5.6 Sol and one-fifth the cost of Mythos 5.
5
1
51
8,175
depthfirst retweeted
Today, @washingtonpost covered critical vulnerabilities @depthfirstlabs found in TikTok. These vulnerabilities allowed hackers to access anything on a user’s device that TikTok itself could access, including the camera, microphone, payment information, photos, and the user’s entire TikTok account. Read more in the thread 🧵
14
81
361
100,906
depthfirst retweeted
I left DeepMind two years ago with the conviction that cybersecurity would be fundamental to the future of AI. The atomic bomb offers lessons about competition, cooperation, and control. But with AI, we do not yet know what forms the technology will take, how its risks will emerge, or what containing them will require. Calls from frontier labs to slow development may buy time. We still need to build the means to stay in control. One thing we do know: AI will run on compute and interact with the world through software and networks. Those systems give us concrete places to observe its behavior, enforce limits, and intervene, even as our understanding of the risks evolves. Some thoughts on this new frontier for cybersecurity: Building the Means to Stay in Control
8
7
57
3,608
We are excited to introduce Dependency Firewall with On-Device Protection. It enforces security policies on devices and blocks malicious or untrusted packages across AI agents, applications, package managers, and registries. Centrally managed without changing how employees use their tools. Thread on supply chain attacks, how agents make this harder, and what device mode enables:
11
11
58
13,612
During our testing, agents often responded to blocked package installations by trying another path. They switched package managers, returned to public registries, changed local settings, or downloaded packages directly.
1
3
271
Device Mode enforces package security policies on the device. It blocks malicious or untrusted packages across AI agents, applications, package managers, and registry configurations. Policies can be managed centrally without changing how employees use their tools. Read more: depthfirst.com/post/introduc…
4
271