93 per cent of members of @FAIreland wanted this game stopped. They listened to the 7. They're scabs and have made the players scabs. Always loved the Irish soccer team through thick and a lot of thin. Tonight a bond is going to be broken for many of my generation. Backs turned.

Mcbeath is a Jonathan (India) Willoughby alt account. As he has no life he make accounts like this to troll people. He’s a lunatic 🤪🤪🤪

The LGBIA needs to sever any & all ties to whatever gender BS the TQ+s of today are peddling. When you've reached the point where even the T's of decades old want nothing to do with you, you know something needs to be done. TRA is misogynistic & homophobic AF. Practically Nazis!

You only ever mean trans activism when you say "lgbtqia+." If people aren't allowed to differentiate between real men and real women, people do not have human rights. If they are forced to allow someone who simply self-ids as a woman or a man in a sex-based space, people do not have human rights. If you normalize sex-imitation based on self-declared distress over one's body with no other kind of objective testing, you're putting children in danger. Valid reason, valid reason, valid reason.

Jesus wept, is Clara doing some sort of Jedi mind control shit? #TraitorsIRL

A landmark Finnish study has found a sharp rise in psychiatric illness among adolescents following sex-alteration procedures. The peer-reviewed study, published in Acta Paediatrica, tracked every young person under 23 who contacted Finland's gender clinics between 1996 and 2019. A total 2,083 individuals were studied, with 16,643 matched controls. They were followed for up to 25 years. Finland's health registers are mandatory, which means no one opts out — this is the complete national picture. The numbers: psychiatric morbidity rose from 9.8% to 60.7% in adolescents who underwent feminising reassignment, and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising reassignment. Even after adjusting for prior psychiatric history, gender-referred adolescents faced five times the risk of male population controls, and three times the risk of female controls. "Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment," the authors concluded. Referrals after 2010 arrived sicker. 47.9% had already needed psychiatric treatment before their first clinic visit, against 15.3% among controls. The authors' read: for some adolescents, gender distress may be secondary to other mental health challenges. The evidence keeps mounting. The silencing continues anyway. How many more adolescents will be told this is "care"?

The Trans Trojan Horse is working perfectly! Sneak in SELF-ID Laws in Parliaments, in the dead of night without debate, seemingly Them-In-Charge are so caring & compassionate about "poor unfortunate men" oh! oooops! Seems to have erased all protective rights for women & girls! Oh well! Let the Opportunistic R@pist Games begin! Patriarchy at it's slimy finest.

I’m sorry lads but the crying is just way too much,, please grow a set.😕 #TraitorsIRL

The stupidest move trans activism ever made was trying to make 'trans women are women' the beginning and end of all argument. If your flagship motto is a self-evidently a lie, don't be surprised if people have questions. But this one comes a close second in idiocy. Trans people already have human rights. The problem is that they're demanding that women surrender theirs.

WOMEN'S RIGHTS AREN'T YOURS TO GIVE AWAY.

True. ‘Biological’ is redundant.

If you don’t think he’s a woman, you’re transphobic. When he claimed to be a woman, he became a woman. He now belongs in women’s changing rooms, bathrooms, hospital wards, prison cells and rape support centres. If you try and differentiate between him and a trans woman who looks more convincing as a woman, you are promoting patriarchal beauty norms. If you admit to seeing an aggressive and possibly unbalanced man in this video, you’re saying all trans people are mentally ill predators. If you refuse to let him into female-only spaces, you’re removing his right to exist. If you suggest he could comfortably use male facilities, you secretly want him assaulted. If you refuse to call him ‘she’, you are guilty of unpardonable cruelty. If you’re a woman who wouldn’t want to share a locker room with him, or a man who wouldn’t want your daughter, sister or mother to get undressed in close proximity to him, you belong to the far-right. If you point out that there is no objective difference between his claim to be a woman and that of any other biological male claiming a trans identity, you are too stupid to understand the circular arguments explaining why he’s not really trans whereas other men who say they’re women are really trans. If you’re righteous, you must argue that this man’s self-declared identity overrides any consideration of the safety and rights of females. To be godly, you must agree he’s as ‘valid’ as every other trans woman, because people are who they say they are. No matter what your eyes, ears and common sense are telling you, if you don’t want to end up on the wrong side of history, you must pretend to believe that this angry, intimidating man is actually a vulnerable, oppressed woman.

As a gay man, I love men. Biological men — adult human males with the biology I’m wired to be attracted to. Trans men are biological women. I’m not attracted to that. That’s not bigotry. That’s called being gay. Sexuality isn’t a hate crime. Preferences aren’t phobias. If you need to rewrite basic biology and shame gay people into pretending otherwise, maybe the problem isn’t us. Same-sex attraction exists for a reason. Let’s stop erasing it. Who else is tired of this gaslighting? 👇

LGBT activist Peter Tatchell, who publicly celebrated the brutal murder of Ann Widdecombe earlier today, once argued that a 9-year-old boy can consent to sex with adult men. These are the voices we are up against. History will not look kindly on him.

As an Irishwoman who has loved and played , this is F ing disgusting from the refs, and FIFA#MEXENG

This is not fucking football!#MEXENG

You mean men, men who claim to be women. You are a national broadcaster that consistently obfuscates facts around sex because you’ve taken an ideological position the public overwhelmingly rejects. This isn’t news, it’s propaganda.

Hi Ethan! As a politician, can you tell us the biological mechanism through which a male mammal becomes female? How we reverse the Müllerian/Wolffian developmental pathways? Why you think internal, ineffable gender feelings need to supersede the material reality of biology in law & policy? Thanks in advance for your genuine and serious answers to these questions!

Pro tip: when arguing, try not to put words into your opponent's mouth that the opponent has never spoken. Try especially hard not to do this when you're arguing in a public forum where everyone can see exactly what has, and hasn't, been said. You're angered that I use accurate language to describe the sexes, because the whole edifice of your ideology collapses if you acknowledge that sex is binary, that it is impossible to change sex, that sex has material, important consequences and that legal rights should be based on observable facts rather than unfalsifiable concepts. You're working backwards from your preferred conclusion and you're prepared to advance nonsensical arguments to do it. Your attempts to change the meaning of the words 'man' and 'woman', to shift them into philosophical concepts, do not change material reality. I'm with Friedrich Engels: "These gentlemen think that when they have changed the names of things they have changed the things themselves. This is how these profound thinkers mock at the whole world."