Optimist. Migration freedom, deregulation, YIMBY. Libertarian/liberal. The singularity is now, and AI x-risk is real. Sorry, but it’s true.

🇺🇸
IMO it made sense to oppose gov intervention when the alternative was the hypercompetent, safety-conscious ppl at frontier labs confidently in control. But now those very ppl explicitly say the race pressure is too much and they need gov to defuse it. I again defer to them!
1
1
17
4,243
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Replying to @quantian1
Someone else said it better, but everything is square packing 🫠
3
13
818
54,519
i love being in a gay, annoying chud universe. Welcome :)
You can do Fourier transforms in O(N log(N)^0.9999999999999) time. Fuck this gay chud universe
77
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
You can do Fourier transforms in O(N log(N)^0.9999999999999) time. Fuck this gay chud universe
73
193
5,926
806,633
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
I don’t pretend to understand anything like all the results GPT achieved in recent weeks, but for me this one has been the most philosophically interesting.
You can do Fourier transforms in O(N log(N)^0.9999999999999) time. Fuck this gay chud universe
8
8
266
37,848
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Am I the only one a little freaked out by the fact that our neat little lower bounds, nlog(n) in this case, are just slightly wrong. The sublime beauty of math is looking like a weak approximation resulting from our limited human faculties.
oh yeah btw guys we can do integer multiplication faster than n log n lol I was definitely very surprised when this one came in lol github.com/openai/math/tree/…
61
48
1,492
86,337
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
I really recommend you savor the renaissance-flavored part of this transformation. Even if you’re not a mathematician, try to sit with one or two of these results and understand them conceptually. It is a beautiful day.
10
11
239
21,956
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Last thing on OAI math. Here is what four models, without search, think it would mean "if it were real". Journalist friends, call a mathematician and ask them to explain. Then call someone in AI and science and ask "what are bottlenecks to this in other practical fields..."
13
54
557
61,062
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Be the society that LLMs think we are
Claude is sure an event of this magnitude would be front-page news because it's extrapolating from the history of news... but today's news media simply can't handle this type of thing and are displaying extreme avoidance behaviour.
13
21
259
7,764
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Claude is sure an event of this magnitude would be front-page news because it's extrapolating from the history of news... but today's news media simply can't handle this type of thing and are displaying extreme avoidance behaviour.
Last thing on OAI math. Here is what four models, without search, think it would mean "if it were real". Journalist friends, call a mathematician and ask them to explain. Then call someone in AI and science and ask "what are bottlenecks to this in other practical fields..."
18
41
663
33,523
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Came up in another conversation, so resharing this wonderful and slightly haunting piece by Yi-Ling Liu. We're all in this together, one way or another. nytimes.com/2026/05/12/opini…
2
7
694
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
This is my favorite one. If you take two numbers and turn them into a convolution network and then do FFT and then exploit symmetries in the butterfly network (?), you can go 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000003% faster (ignoring the constants) progress is progress
oh yeah btw guys we can do integer multiplication faster than n log n lol I was definitely very surprised when this one came in lol github.com/openai/math/tree/…
17
51
1,978
106,778
Okay, he literally says that, but seems what he meant to say is that the war is to *stop* them from being able to take out a U.S. city, and the high fuel costs are a small price to pay for that security. But he really put his foot in his mouth.
Trump on Iran: Let 'em take out Los Angeles and San Diego, it's a small price to pay
33
16
1,185
lol. Guys i hate Trump more than u i just am trying to be unimpeachably fair
12
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
In the Scott Alexander vs Steven Pinker debate, it really is notable that one side has a much, much better track record on predicting AI trends than the other… At this point, the burden of proof is on Pinker as to why we should still listen to him.
25
35
581
24,393
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Being wrong is bad.
Replying to @SarahTheHaider
Scott might be cringe here, but he also has the annoying property of being right.
5
6
290
6,619
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
Turns out that the economics profession understands tariffs after all... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Trade deficit hits $105.6 billion, widest since just before Trump tariffs enacted last year cnbc.com/2026/10/06/trade-de…
5
208
2,306
127,205
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
I sympathize with this critique but when George Lucas tried to build a museum in San Francisco he couldn’t get permission for a site.
It’s incredible how much wealth SF entrepreneurs have created and how little of it has gone toward building culture. Where are the great museums, new architecture, music venues, public spaces? Silicon Valley should aspire to leave behind more than ephemeral software.
55
203
4,250
116,212
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
USAID derangement is so incredible because for years the fringe left insisted it was an imperialist tool to elect right-wingers and now the far-right insists it was a globalist tool to elect leftists.
32
385
2,139
40,173
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
The president of the United States calling for The New York Times and other "artificial media outlets" to be *arrested* for publishing stuff that offends his ego is third-world country behavior, actually. It's hard to believe that MAGA ever claimed to be the free speech movement.
162
376
1,785
51,115
This is way too pessimistic about cooperation imo, and timelines too short
When Jacob Coxon was asked what he meant by 'plans for next year,' he said: 'This was talking directly to people running research. Not Dario Amodei but people who have been at the company for a long time and have a lot of context about the company's trajectory. They've been pretty consistent that 2027 is when things get crazy. The main thing that came up informally in conversation was that people didn't expect government regulation to happen in time and, in particular, did not expect any sort of international cooperation to be possible. Which maybe shouldn't have been surprising to me, but it was surprising.' • '2027 is when things get crazy' – I agree, and I predicted in January that, looking back, 2026 will be seen as the last normal year. If you think we have already passed the weirdness threshold, we haven't. This is still normal relative to what will start happening between 2027 and 2030. • 'people didn't expect government regulation to happen in time' – I agree, it won't. It's clear to me that (barring a catastrophic near miss) nothing regulatory will change in this regard until 2029 at the earliest. And for multiple reasons, I don't think it's even clear it will happen then. Regardless, 2029 is too late for it to matter. In my opinion, we will have real RSI by next summer. The loop will be closed, and progress toward ASI will proceed much more rapidly from that point onward. • 'did not expect any sort of international cooperation to be possible' – I agree, it won't. For Pacing the Frontier to work, the Pacers needed all the national labs on board, a supportive administration, and an agreement with China. They don't have any of those things, and they're not getting any of them. What they have now instead is an openly hostile, adversarial administration that will likely work against anything they propose all the way through 2029. And without a supportive administration, an agreement with China is impossible. I accepted all of this as true a long time ago. As a result, I've felt like Zarathustra watching people talk about the success of Pacing for the last few weeks. Pacers, I say all of this without rancor; you got a preference cascade from the Coxon event. As a result, you have a public that, for the first time, understands what x-risk is. You could - potentially - turn this into momentum for the next election, and then start to change policy, but for that to matter you would need the most important thing of all: time. And you don't have it. You don't have two years to make it to the general. In my opinion, you probably don't even have one. The labs can't even predict what capabilities look like three months from now anymore. A lot of things turned out to be easier than expected. We're closer than people think, and we're moving faster than people believe. You ran out of time. There is no stopping this train before things really start to kick off.
1
6
671
Eric Schmidt 🇺🇦 retweeted
junk DNA deniers unironically believe this guy needs every single of its 90 billion base pairs to do what it does but humans are fine with 3
A species of lungfish found in South America has claimed the title of the animal with the biggest genome sequenced so far. The DNA of Lepidosiren paradoxa comprises a staggering 91 billion chemical letters or “bases,” 30 times as many as the human genome, researchers reported in 2024. However, those 91 billion bases of DNA only contain about the same number of genes that humans have—roughly 20,000—with the rest consisting of noncoding, perhaps even “junk” DNA. By comparing this genome with those of other lungfishes, the researchers determined that L. paradoxa adds the equivalent of a human genome to its DNA every 10 million years. Learn more on #WorldAnimalDay: scim.ag/4o4YCe5
31
52
2,502
73,159