🇬🇧 AI Policy (Cambridge Uni), Engineer (Oxford Uni), Founder @FlockCover (acquired), Investor @Neuralink, @AndurilTech, @AnthropicAI, @ETNshow + more.

England, United Kingdom
My company @flockcover has been acquired for $109M. Thank you to many folk on X for the helpful advice along the way.
17
2
88
20,193
“Use Al efficiently to reduce its environmental impact” - do these people realize that a ChatGPT conversation requires as much water as one forty-thousandths of a single almond
the uk government's official ai guidance tells civil servants to use gemini flash instead of pro, keep prompts short, and not say thank you to it, for the environment i do wonder at which point we forked the road. instead of building and using it to automate the work, we write guidance on how to use less of it we have the attitude of a high school prefect. caring more about the rules than actually doing the work
1
5
801
This 2015 tweet aged like milk
Humanity is that much safer with @elonmusk and @sama backing @open_ai. Fantastic development. @FHIOxford @CSER
2
9
1,960
Ed Leon Klinger retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
Fair point! Now that I have you: can you confirm or deny my conspiracy that all of your companies are part of a master plan to spread the light of consciousness into the cosmos?
Ed Leon Klinger
16
8
79
36,063
When I made this graphic I considered adding a gradient to the human line but thought, "What's the point - no one will see it anyway." Next thing I know I'm being chart mogged by Elon
Replying to @edleonklinger
Peak human intelligence has been increasing over time, with a sharp jump about 7000 years ago, and AI intelligence also has a slope, but the main point of the chart is valid
2
42
9,915
Hey @grok, what are the odds of having been born as a human during the singularity? Show your working please…
Hardly anyone on Earth understands the magnitude of this. It's actually happening right now. Crazy that we get to witness it close up.
20
3
78
110,851
Ed Leon Klinger retweeted
Hardly anyone on Earth understands the magnitude of this. It's actually happening right now. Crazy that we get to witness it close up.
Made with AI
554
712
7,583
1,314,436
Helpful non-technical hack to make @bot even more useful for founders/small business owners: 1. Create a new bot - "CONTEXT BOT". Tell it to: a) Hoover up as much context as possible by reading all your emails (work and personal), WhatsApp messages (using WhatsApp Web), LinkedIn messages, and call transcripts (using Granlola MCP or equivalent) b) Map your entire network: every person you know, all the things they care about, who knows who, promises made to you and vice versa, etc. c) Refresh its own data corpus every night at 2am so it's always up-to-date 4. Tell all other bots to now reference CONTEXT BOT whenever they take actions relating to your network. For example: if you're about to meet someone, have your meeting-planner check CONTEXT BOT to refresh its memory on the person you're meeting, their sentiment on different topics, any open action items, etc. If you're sending an email, have it reference CONTEXT BOT to understand your communication style with that person. 5. You now have the foundations of a distributed chief-of-staff living across multiple bots, powered by a single up-to-date bot (CONTEXT BOT). You'll notice a higher success rate across all bots, and the benefit compounds over time Big thanks to @lennysan @johnbai @benjitaylor @mattyp @poteto @roshan_s for the game-changing tech and beautiful UI - @bot is an absolute masterpiece
6
1,626
A driverless car buying AirPods and ordering coffee. We are living in the future.
Grok @Bot Tesla Integration is officially here! This is another game changer. While FSD drives you around, you’ll be able to talk to your team of Bots and have them perform tasks, or finish your work. In this video, one of my Bots ordered me a new pair of AirPods while I was driving to the mall. It also ordered a coffee so I could grab it on the way out. I was able to drive there, order my AirPods, and get a coffee all totally hands-free. This is another massive reason to buy a @Tesla. It just keeps getting better and better. Grok Bot integration is available now for Super Heavy Users (more tiers will have access soon).
1
1
10
2,627
Unbelievable productivity hack for Tesla owners but the big bet here is embedding this into robo-taxis. First viable concept I have seen for "getting work done" during your commute
.@Grok in your Tesla can now do meaningful work for you With Connectors, you can manage your inbox, clean up your calendar, or talk through existing files/chat/tasks – all hands-free
5
1,440
My favorite conspiracy is that every single Elon company is one piece of a giant puzzle to spread human consciousness into the cosmos. Humour me for a second here:
1
6
22,046
Selling Flock was the most intense period of my life. 6 months, 2 babies, 1 car crash, 109 million dollars. I tried my best to sum it all up in under 4 minutes.
1
21
1,645
I generally love @theallinpod but this week's discussion about AI risk felt a bit like the meme
Can we all agree that “frontier labs are lying about AI safety to pump their IPOs, capture the regulators, and make more money” is a conspiracy theory at this point? For it to be true, Sam, Dario, Demis, and Elon all have to be lying, along with a big chunk of their execs, chief scientists, and resigning employees. It also asks you to believe the labs volunteered for much heavier scrutiny that slows them down in the middle of the biggest ARR growth run in the history of capitalism with no signs of slowing down … because they want to make more money by inventing regulatory hurdles that only they can clear(?). And OpenAI has now said it would even be willing to delay its own IPO over safety concerns - i.e. put off (maybe risk entirely) the biggest liquidity event ever in Silicon Valley. The conspiracy requires us to believe that they’re doing that to make more money(?) Elon agrees with Dario; i.e. the guy who ran D.O.G.E is *asking for more scrutiny and regulation*. And we're supposed to believe that's because he thinks it will help his company succeed(?) A much simpler explanation at this point: they think the risk is real.
12
26
306
13,068
Very rare for @friedberg to get this so wrong (he is usually excellent). Covid is a great analogy but for the opposite reason: the “experts” initially massively underplayed it. Only a small cohort of people who understood exponential growth were able to accurately forecast its trajectory. It ended up killing millions.
David Friedberg Says We Are in Another ‘Trust the Experts’ Moment With AI “Fauci told us that COVID will k*ll us all and as a result, we need to lock down the entire world … We're told we have to listen to the experts once again, and in this case, the expert is a six-week employed individual who … worked at an NGO, whose literal job was to scare the sh*t out of people to stop doing AI development.”
4
32
5,666
Can we all agree that “frontier labs are lying about AI safety to pump their IPOs, capture the regulators, and make more money” is a conspiracy theory at this point? For it to be true, Sam, Dario, Demis, and Elon all have to be lying, along with a big chunk of their execs, chief scientists, and resigning employees. It also asks you to believe the labs volunteered for much heavier scrutiny that slows them down in the middle of the biggest ARR growth run in the history of capitalism with no signs of slowing down … because they want to make more money by inventing regulatory hurdles that only they can clear(?). And OpenAI has now said it would even be willing to delay its own IPO over safety concerns - i.e. put off (maybe risk entirely) the biggest liquidity event ever in Silicon Valley. The conspiracy requires us to believe that they’re doing that to make more money(?) Elon agrees with Dario; i.e. the guy who ran D.O.G.E is *asking for more scrutiny and regulation*. And we're supposed to believe that's because he thinks it will help his company succeed(?) A much simpler explanation at this point: they think the risk is real.
547
227
1,767
208,484
For all the talk about billionaires being evil, it's quite the narrative violation that three of the richest people in the world have decided to "pace the frontier“ - thereby massively curtailing their own power and wealth for the benefit of humankind
5
9
1,887
This is one of the most incredible threads I have ever seen on this platform. Cannot recommend more highly taking 20 minutes to read/watch it all. (Sorry, I know this is not a post about frontier AI. I will be back to regular programming soon) 🇺🇸 ❤️
September 11, 2001 has been a very rough and busy day, so by popular request I’m making a single thread with the day’s highlights: 1. 8:46 AM: the world was shocked by a surprise crash at the World Trade Center, initially perceived to be a small plane but soon discovered to be a deliberate jet collision.
3
3
9
3,821
Ed Leon Klinger retweeted
It’s insane that anyone seriously believes this virus from China is going to cause "widespread harm". From what I’m seeing it’s barely worse than flu. The experts warning about it are simply alarmists. Nothing in my day-to-day life has changed yet. This is a post about AI.
34
12
84
3,283
Lots of discussion about AI ending the world but surprisingly little mention of how that might actually happen in practice. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t require terminator robots (in the main). Imagine a worst-case-scenario: 2027 we see the first AI powered cyber attacks - transport hubs, hospital equipment, air traffic control systems etc. become compromised. 10,000 - 100,000 dead - blamed on a few rogue AI agents. 2028 massive sabotage of critical infrastructure - power outages across entire cities, contaminated water supplies, road and rail networks unsafe and unusable. 1,000,000 - 10,000,000 dead - blamed on malicious foreign actors. 2029 autonomous weapons systems go rogue. Missile silos, gunships, nuclear launchers intentionally targeting military and civilian infrastructure. 10,000,000 - 100,000,000 dead - Governments attempt (but fail) to “shut down AI”. 2030 AI penetrates bio labs and manufactures highly contagious pathogens leading to a global pandemic more deadly and contagious than COVID. 1000,000,000 - 8000,000,000 dead. Existential scenario. Could all of this happen? Could any of it? Sounds like a doomed mindset but many of the leading AI researchers seem to think so, and we ignore them at our own peril. It doesn’t seem completely implausible, given the rate of progress we’re now seeing at the frontier. Let’s not forget that AI has fantastic benefits and is already saving lives - it might well be the greatest thing ever to happen to humanity! But let’s get real about the risks too - which are numerous. And large.
Can someone paint the most likely scenario for how "AI kills humanity by the end of this decade?" Maybe I'm having failure of imagination...
128
226
1,175
282,354
My timelines are slightly off (too optimistic)
JUST IN: OpenAI is working to prevent its AI from hacking the US power grid
6
1,619