No one likes changing the clock, me included, but Congress has enacted permanent Daylight Savings Time multiple times before and repealed it each time once Americans experienced absurdly late sunrises in the winter. Arkansans don’t want their kids going to school in the pitch dark, and I’ll always put Arkansas first.

Tucker Carlson asks why algebra puts letters into numbers. Jess Elofson explains: "I think just to fuck with you." They discuss how they've never met anyone in their life who uses algebra, which is "fake math" for people "in the matrix." They conclude that caring about algebra is something that only "good little goy slaves" do.

Did Andrew Tates lawyer seriously hold a press conference so he could call his client a lying grifter and his followers a bunch of retards who got scammed by him? “Sure, my client is a con artist, but that’s why he’s innocent. He was just lying when he admitted to all those crimes on camera so 16 year old boys would sign up for his fake online university because they’re stupid and gullible.” That’s a bold strategy, can’t wait to see how it works out for him.

How my enemies perceive me, according to Grok

Popsicles and box fans are in high demand.

Karmelo Anthony hearing update: the motion for retrial has been denied!!!!

This is absurd. Should conservatives not want power? Then what's the point? And even if I agreed that our motivating principle should be "limiting government power," you would still need to HAVE power in order to do that. So one way or another, unless you want your movement to be totally impotent and ineffectual and defeated, you want power. There is literally no other way to achieve even the aim that you've laid out in this post.

🚨BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s defense filing is out, submitted by his attorneys on August 11, 2026, following the preliminary hearing. And the entire filing is absolutely ludicrous. 🚨I’m providing the entire filing in this thread …with my summary. Tyler Robinson’s defense is essentially arguing that yes, Charlie Kirk was deliberately targeted, yes, one shot was fired directly at him, and yes, Robinson allegedly admitted, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it” - but somehow the State is reaching too far with the additional charges and aggravating factors. Their argument against the “great risk of death” aggravator is almost absurdly simple: Robinson fired ONE shot. He intended to hit Charlie. He hit Charlie. Nobody else was hit. Therefore, according to the defense, he did not knowingly create a great risk of death to anyone else. Never mind that this happened at a crowded public event. Never mind that he was allegedly firing a high-powered rifle from a rooftop toward an area filled with people. The defense argues that because the bullet traveled downward, hit its intended target, and did not strike anyone else, prosecutors cannot establish the required risk to another person merely because people were nearby. They even attack the significance of the shooting targets recovered from Robinson’s apartment. Their argument? The State supposedly cannot establish when those targets were shot, what firearm was used, or whether Robinson personally fired every shot. They similarly dismiss the screwdriver found on the roof, arguing that its existence doesn’t prove Robinson took the rifle apart or reassembled it. Then we get to witness tampering. Robinson told Lance Twiggs to “ask for a lawyer and stay silent” if police questioned him. The State charged Robinson with witness tampering based on the allegation that he was attempting to induce his roommate to withhold information. The defense says absolutely not. According to them, Robinson was merely giving Twiggs perfectly innocent constitutional advice. Their position is that because Robinson also allegedly said he intended to turn himself in and told Twiggs to be polite to police, this was altruistic advice - not an attempt to interfere with an investigation. Then there are the children. Children under 14 were at the event. The defense doesn’t dispute that. Instead, they argue that prosecutors cannot prove Robinson KNEW THEY WERE THERE. Their reasoning is that Robinson was approximately 400 feet away and allegedly spent only 35-44 seconds positioned on the rooftop before the shot. They literally distinguish this from shooting at an elementary school or daycare, where someone’s knowledge that children were present could reasonably be inferred. Because this happened on a college campus, they say the State cannot establish that Robinson knew children were in that crowd. And then we arrive at perhaps the most ridiculous argument in the entire filing: political motivation. Charlie Kirk was one of the most recognizable political activists in America. Robinson wrote, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it.” He also said, “I had enough of his hatred.” But according to the defense, that’s still not enough. Why? Because Robinson apparently didn’t provide prosecutors with a neat little itemized list explaining precisely which Charlie Kirk political position he hated. That is essentially their argument.

Absolute state of this. Young lad purchases a baseball bat in "Modern England". As soon as he leaves the store, police grab him for "carrying a weapon". The bat is literally still in it's plastic covering.

Thank you Comptroller Huffines. Slashing and eliminating property taxes is essential priority.

New York just legalized euthanasia by calling it the “Medical Aid In Dying” Act. Guess what comes next? Insurance companies start denying life saving care and start recommending a more cost effective option. Isn’t socialism great?!

NEW: California startup Satyress unveils a 2 meter tall centaur robot designed to enter disaster zones too dangerous for humans.