harm reduction Patrickforever26♥️💀🦋 all things woo woo, NO DMs please!

flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @atrupar
The father didn't put his kid in danger. Hecwas dropping off st school.. The unidentified ICE officers created the danger.
1
1
6
116
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @TampaDan
In my seventh grade civics class, I learned the difference between socialism and communism. Open a book
1
1
10
168
flaxenone retweeted
I've got something I need to get off my chest!
258
919
2,249
19,174
flaxenone retweeted
And fuck you Marc
17
228
1,379
11,282
#MaineSenate Maine voter interviewed by the Washington Post “I like Susan Collins… But God could be running as a Republican and I would vote against him or her because I think this country will be destroyed if Trump has another two years unfettered.” washingtonpost.com/politics/…
65
605
6,193
376,099
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @PeteButtigieg
@Grok: Find the five most blatant examples of a member of Congress voting against the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and later taking credit for funding or projects made possible by it. Quote what they said before and after.
2
2
7
510
flaxenone retweeted
Here are five documented cases of lawmakers who voted against the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law then claimed credit for its projects: 1. Nancy Mace (R-SC): Called it a "socialist wish list." Later celebrated a $26M transit grant in her district. 2. Ashley Hinson (R-IA): Labeled it "spending at its worst." Then said "We secured $829M" for Mississippi River locks and dams. 3. Rick Scott (R-FL): Opposed over deficit costs. Later: "proud... to help secure $1B for Everglades restoration." 4. Gary Palmer (R-AL): Called it "recklessly expensive" with "Green New Deal" waste. Touted $369M Northern Beltline funding as his priority. 5. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL): Said it fails Alabama’s “fair slice” and adds debt. Later: “Great to see Alabama receive crucial funds” for $1.4B broadband. This practice has historical precedents across parties.
9
12
556
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @JamesTate121
Shall we guess which two states have the largest chapters of Moms for Liberty, AKA the Minivan Taliban, Klanned Karenhood, Assholes with Casseroles, Mary KayKayKay…
1
1
2
39
flaxenone retweeted
I’m exhausted too. You all went overboard with the madness. Just stop.
170
1,221
4,856
124,444
Massachusetts made community college free and it changed my life. I am glad it is expanding to other states.
WE ARE EXPANDING FREE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR NEW YORKERS because EDUCATION CHANGES LIVES!
16
137
1,521
12,026
flaxenone retweeted
Trump, and Trump alone, ran up a $2 trillion deficit in 2026..
9
59
190
1,392
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @Acyn
Imagine going in to public service to serve the public good and then doing it. Every. Single. Day. "Look for the helpers". We see you @ZohranKMamdani
3
22
315
RT @DroolieA: The reason Mayor Mamdani is so effective and can make so much change in a short time is because he isn't bought and paid for.…
135
flaxenone retweeted
I'm not asking you to vote blue no matter who. I'm asking you to research everybody on your ballot, and to reject any candidate that is even tangentially involved with MAGA and Donald Trump. We gotta cut that cancer out of our politics forever
669
2,249
13,714
257,265
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @NormOrnstein
What a load of old shite. A President who tried to overthrow democracy in a violent coup attempt, shall be rewarded with complete immunity from all crimes. Where does it say that in the constitution.?
2
15
117
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @Acyn @ItWasACoup
Yes. The founding fathers famously wanted unfettered power given to one man without checks and balances and immunity for all crimes just like it says in the constitution. Alito is an idiot.
Alito: Some people do not like that. They want the constitution to mean whatever they want it to mean at a particular point in time. They want it to protect things that it does not protect. They want it to allow things that it does not allow.
5
15
124
1,906
flaxenone retweeted
Replying to @TheTNHoller
1
5
55
So lazy when there is no defense, all they got is : "wHaT iS a WoMaN"
Replying to @atrupar
TAPPER: “It seems to be showing up in the data, just not the data you’re looking at.” The party that has pushed policies involving men competing in women’s sports, gender-related medical interventions for minors, and government mandates wants to lecture everyone else about the data? Maybe start by looking at the data voters are actually concerned about, instead of telling people what they should be seeing.
66
flaxenone retweeted
262
2,812
22,602
257,255