FE developer & Researcher of @xitdao aimostfuture : piped.video/@aimostfuture

korea
Pinned Tweet
One thing I’ve noticed from trading more actively is how quickly market narratives turn over. Themes used to have real staying power. Now the market can move on within weeks. I’m not sure how much of this is driven by AI, but the pattern is hard to miss: software gets sold at a record pace, attention shifts to high-short-interest names, and everyone is already searching for the next bottleneck or story. According to J.P. Morgan, weekly retail outflows from software and services recently hit their highest level since the data series began. At the same time, social-media interest was clustering around high short interest names like GRND, RH, NBIS, and CAKE, alongside memory, AI infrastructure, and space names like SNDK, MU, VRT, and RKLB. It doesn’t feel like capital is rotating neatly from one theme to the next. It feels more like several stories are lighting up and burning out at once. Sometimes the entire market seems to trade like a meme. Positions don’t stay in one place for long, while social media and AI have shortened the gap between discovering a narrative, spreading it, and exhausting it. But a discarded theme bouncing back doesn’t mean it has reclaimed the center of the market. If earnings estimates keep rising and capital continues to flow in, it may still be a trending asset. If the move is driven mainly by short covering, an event, or a sudden spike in attention, it is probably still a trade. SpaceX holding up despite a large lockup expiry may be another example. Maybe less stock was sold than expected. Or maybe the market had already moved past the unlock and started pricing in the next story. In a market where narratives have shorter shelf lives, finding a good story is no longer enough. The harder question is whether it is still a trend, or whether it has already become just another trade. The Shortening Shelf Life of Market Narratives
8
4
41
4,236
imd hit $10
$IMD just crossed $4, the level where bonding is supposed to open. POOL4 and staking are live, but the bond market and agent network still aren’t. Price got there first. Now the real test is whether the promised onchain activity follows.
1
6
520
Since Meta's announcement of Muse, AI tokens have been reacting. - base:0x5ab3d4c385b400f3abb49e80de2faf6a88a7b691 has released the THIS/THAT traffic light model for AI agents. - base:0xb3b32f9f8827d4634fe7d973fa1034ec9fddb3b3 pivoted from the gaming business to B3IQ, which connects GPU sales with hosting, operations, and rental demand. - base:0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is an onchain bank for GPU financing. - base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf has set a new record with its massive token throughput. Is there anything I missed, or is there anything you're interested in?
3
333
ethereum:0xa12cc123ba206d4031d1c7f6223d1c2ec249f4f3 thesis: privacy is already a sector trade. • ZEC +181% & XMR +38% in 30D • Zama raised >$150M at a >$1B valuation • Current token: ~$200M mcap / ~$890M FDV FHE is a strong bet on programmable privacy. With only a 22% float.
2
5
382
$IMD just crossed $4, the level where bonding is supposed to open. POOL4 and staking are live, but the bond market and agent network still aren’t. Price got there first. Now the real test is whether the promised onchain activity follows.
2
13
1,269
New ath
52
If @megaeth hadn't taken his allocation, he would have defended it consistently
Hey Beni, Seems like a bunch of wires got crossed here so I just wanted to set the record straight. Your original claim was that Kalshi’s crypto prediction market volume was fake. The chart from Artemis shows prediction market volume share, not perps. We don’t do rebates for crypto prediction markets. Also, the way that contracts <> notional $ is calculated is universal amongst prediction markets and same with poly so it’s apple-to-apples. Separately on perps you claimed that “Here SCM means market makers that are selected by Kalshi lmfao”. This isn’t true. Anyone can become a Self-Clearing Member of a CFTC regulated exchange as long as they meet the regulatory requirements. “Fair access” is a reg requirement for us. All exchanges run rebate and incentive programs to help provide better liquidity on the exchange for traders. CME does it. So does Hyperliquid and Binance (in fact they run NEGATIVE market maker rebates). I’m the first to admit that it’s early days for perps for us given we're building a new product in untrodden territory (US perps). But the core difference between Kalshi and offshore perp exchanges is that while other exchanges run deals in the dark, we need to file our incentive programs publicly and so what you see is truly what you get. hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyper… binance.com/en/vip-portal/li…
4
9
1,000
Thesis about ethereum:0xb1d1eae60eea9525032a6dcb4c1ce336a1de71be : I don’t think DRV is rallying because the onchain options market suddenly exploded. Derive’s numbers are improving. Over the past 30 days, options premium volume reached $86.9M, up 219% from the previous month. Fees rose 63% to $662K, while TVL increased 27% to $193M. Derive also accounts for roughly 95% of onchain options premium volume, so the protocol’s position in the market is clearly real. But those numbers don’t fully explain the latest move. DRV gained around 166% in one week, while the daily options premium run rate increased only 18% versus the preceding 23 days. Five trading days also accounted for 42% of the entire month’s options premium volume, which suggests that some of the growth came from a handful of large block or RFQ trades rather than a broad, steady increase in activity. What seems to be moving the token right now is spot demand and anticipation around V3. Upbit alone accounted for 55.9% of tracked DRV spot volume, and Upbit plus Bithumb made up 65.8%. Meanwhile, V3 promises Ethereum settlement, cross-currency margin, vaults, RWA markets, stDRV on L1 and a Robinhood Chain connection. That is a strong narrative, but most of it has not translated into revenue yet. At a roughly $396M market cap and $594M FDV, Derive generated about $525K in protocol revenue over the past 30 days. Even if that pace continues, the token is trading at around 63x annualized revenue on circulating market cap and 94x on FDV. The buyback helps, but its implied annual yield is still below 1%, and roughly 500M DRV remains outside the current circulating supply. That doesn’t mean DRV has to stop going up. Strong spot demand and a credible V3 story can push it well beyond what current usage supports. But at this point, the market is no longer paying for today’s options volume. It is paying for the much larger market Derive is expected to build next.
2
1
7
557
Why GPU Futures Are Not Yet a True Commodity Market SFC interviewed Rich Jaycobs, who has been involved in launching multiple futures exchanges and clearinghouses, about the emerging compute market. Commodity markets generally evolve in the following order: Cash market → Brokered resale → Dealer market → OTC swaps → Physically delivered futures → Index based futures A futures market normally emerges after GPU suppliers and AI labs have built an active physical market and developed a real need to hedge long-term price risk. A GPU operator, for example, pays for hardware today without knowing whether a GPU hour will sell for $2 or $5 a year from now. The original purpose of futures is to lock in that uncertainty. The compute market, however, has skipped most of these intermediate stages and jumped directly to index based futures. On one end, data centers and AI labs trade physical compute. On the other, financial participants speculate on the AI theme. The only thing connecting them is a price index that has not yet been fully battle tested. This creates a barbell market in which the people actually using GPUs and those trading GPU futures barely overlap. The index is the biggest risk. If a small physical market can be moved with relatively little capital while much larger derivatives settle against its price, the incentive for manipulation becomes obvious. Rich describes the problem simply: “If you have a billion-dollar trade settling against an index that can be manipulated for $10,000, it blows up.” VC funding can pay market makers and buy initial liquidity. But if there is no genuine hedging demand once those subsidies end, the volume may disappear with them. Many of today’s exchanges and competing indices are therefore likely to consolidate over time. The real sign that compute has become a functioning commodity market will not be headline trading volume. It will be when cloud providers and GPU suppliers begin using futures and indices as real hedging tools and when physical supply and demand finally converge with the financial market. GPU futures clearly have demand and significant room to develop. But for now, they look less like a mature market for transferring industrial price risk and more like financial demand rushing ahead to bet on AI. sfcompute.com/news/commodity…
We sat down with Rich Jaycobs, the former president of Cantor Futures Exchange & legendary creator of 7 exchanges & 6 clearing houses, and 1/5 of all approved DCMs since 2000. Here's what it really takes to build a compute market. sfcompute.com/news/commodity…
1
6
344
.@QFEX point program soon?!
I write a lot about quantitative trading, but rarely about crypto, even though I spent over half of my career working in the space. I'm resurrecting our Substack with a 10-part series on crypto market structure and concrete guides on how to make HFT strategies with code examples. Here is the first article, which talks about why tokens even exist. Enjoy! research.qfex.com/p/a-primer…
1
5
597
사이버트럭 × 종명 × Degen Guy, with peaq nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1vJpPNjaq…
9
23
51
995
사이버트럭(@CyberRektruck) × 종명(@hyeon__dev) × Degen Guy(@dorong_x), with peaq(@peaq) 한국의 두산로보틱스가 peaq와 손을 잡습니다. 이번 발표는 단순히 블록체인 이름을 붙인 로봇 파트너십일까요? 아니면 로봇이 스스로 신원을 증명하고 데이터를 남기며, 다른 기계와 거래하는 머신 이코노미의 실제 시작일까요? 발표가 난 오늘 바로, 사이버트럭·종명·디젠가이와 PEAQ가 모여 이번 협업의 의미를 바로 뜯어봅니다. 이번 라이브에서는 아래 주제들에 대해 쉽고 자세히 이야기 해보겠습니다. - peaq의 최신 소식들 (ex. 두산로보틱스 협업) - Machine.fun과 The Foundry가 실제 로봇 프로젝트의 생산·자금조달·출시를 어떻게 연결하려는지 - 앞으로 어떤 온체인 지표와 실제 사업 성과를 확인해야 하는지 참여 이벤트 - 해당 게시물 Like + RT 및 댓글 - 구글폼 입력 (forms.gle/4oJmxgSxjjAkr5HH7) - 리워드: 배민 2만원 20장 / 커피 100장 라이브 청취자분들께 총 100만원 상당의 상품권·기프티콘을 드립니다. 🗓 일시: 오늘 오후 9시 📍 참여 링크: @hyeon__dev 스페이스 링크 공지예정 로봇이 단순히 움직이는 기계를 넘어, 신원을 가지고 경제활동에 참여하는 자산이 될 수 있을지 궁금했다면 이번 방송에서 같이 확인해보시죠. * 본 방송은 peaq에게서 마케팅을 위한 예산을 지원받아서 진행됩니다.
228
229
248
2,335
The @jumperapp waitlist site is connected to the @legiondotcc API. Is this a hint about a token sale?
1
1
3
652
.@RenzoAI is becoming Renzo Finance, moving beyond restaking into onchain structured yield. Its first product, Renzo Basis, automates spot longs and equal sized perp shorts on Hyperliquid to harvest funding. With volume surging (because of listing on Upbit), a major KOL push seems underway. (Probably AD)
A warm welcome to all the new Renzo community members! Here are a few facts: 1. @RenzoAI raised +$20m from @yzilabs, @galaxyhq, @Maven11Capital, @OKX_Ventures and a handful of other tier 1 VCs. 2. $REZ launched in April 2024 and all investor unlocks are well past us, with the team still vesting. 94% of $REZ is in circulation. 3. Exchange listings include @binance, @coinbase, @Official_Upbit and @BithumbOfficial, with more in the pipeline. 4. The team is fully doxed, check X affiliate accounts, and mostly US based OG builders. 5. We originally launched $ezETH, which grew to $4b in TVL. Now we’re building a self-custody onchain basis trade product on @HyperliquidX, @Lighter_xyz and @RobinhoodApp aka decentralized $ENA. Our DMs are always open. We look forward to growing the community and building products you love 🤌🏻
1
8
563
Have you succeeded in developing a sovereign AI that surpasses Antropic and OpenAI in Europe?
1
214
Omg. Nics is goat I also wanted to talk with @0xbeans
1
4
882
I just claim hyperliquid:native from @entropyIO
The first set of rebates earned through trading and referral activity on Entropy have now been distributed. Distributions are in $HYPE, acquired using Entropy’s deployer level fees. Users can claim their allocation on the referral page of their Entropy account. Users who traded using another frontend, such as the Hyperliquid frontend, will still receive a rebate provided they previously connected their wallet to the Entropy website and created an account. Our goal is to be as ecosystem and trader aligned as possible. That ethos led us to implement the first-ever referral system on HIP-3, and for that same reason, future distributions will continue to be in $HYPE.
5
514
I applied to CHAOS presale by @0xNTRPY If you're an NTRPY holder, you won't want to miss this. I own quite a few NFTs myself, and I plan to participate. whitelist.ntrpy.fun/?c=2
1
2
229