ICYMI | IHE and Hanover Research asked provosts about the rapidly changing federal and state policy landscape; tenure, shared governance and academic freedom; faculty and staff retention; and academic program health and institutional effectiveness.
➡️
bit.ly/3V8NV0N
ALT A photo illustration collage of speech bubbles, the U.S. Capitol building, a professor gesturing in front of a whiteboard, a stack of 100-dollar bills, and a cell phone displaying an AI chat bot.
In white text the kicker Governance, the headline From AI Use to Funding Cuts: How Provosts Are Navigating 2026, and the dek Inside Higher Ed’s annual CAO survey reveals a fractured landscape, where academic leaders rely on personal AI tools amid broader technological and political disruption.
Photo illustration by Justin Morrison/Inside Higher Ed | dkfielding, g-stockstudio and OlekStock/iStock/Getty Images | Thai Liang Lim/E+/Getty Images
ALT Title: AI Deployment
Description: Provosts (all) say how their institution is currently using AI, by survey year:
A bar chart showing the percentage of Provosts who use an AI feature in 2025 verses 2026.
Virtual chat assistants and chatbots at 52%
Research and data analysis at 42%
Administrative processes (e.g., scheduling, resource allocation) 39%
Learning management systems (LMS) 34%
Predictive analytics to predict student performance and trends 28%
Admissions processes 26%
Student advising and support 23%
Institutional planning and decision-making 22%
Student engagement 21%
Grading and assessment 20%
Cybersecurity 14%
Fundraising 11%
Personalized learning pathways 8%
None: The institution does not
currently utilize AI 7%
Other 6%
ALT A text block reads: Over all, provosts’ attitudes toward the technology remain mixed. Nearly half of provosts—48 percent—rate AI’s impact on higher ed as neither positive nor negative. About 28 percent say its impact has been positive, and 17 percent say it’s been negative.
ALT Title: Outside Influencer
Chart description: Provosts (all and by Public or Private/nonprofit sector) who say the following groups have more to much more influence on academic decision-making at their institution now, compared with two years ago:
Overall, Federal Policy and Employers/Industry had the largest impact, with public institutions ranking it higher.