Today I testified before the Texas A&M Board of Regents in opposition to Agenda Item 4.1, which seeks to remove courses addressing race, gender, multiculturalism, and contemporary social issues from the core curriculum:
My name is Dr. Leonard Bright, professor at Texas A&M University. Today, I speak as a Texas citizen and President of the American Association of University Professors–Texas A&M College Station Chapter.
I rise in strong opposition to Agenda Item 4.1.
This proposal prepares students for a world we have left behind—and advances a political agenda unrelated to our educational mission.
It implies that understanding race, gender, sexuality, multiculturalism, and contemporary society is somehow less fundamental to education.
In what world is that the case?
A world in which our institutions emphasized whiteness, male-domination, and Western-centered? A world in which racial discrimination was written into law, women were denied equal opportunities, and people were persecuted because of their sexuality?
That world existed. And America has spent generations confronting that legacy and struggling to fulfill its promises of liberty, equality, freedom of speech, and freedom of thought in our continuing effort to form a more perfect Union.
North America has never been culturally monolithic. Long before the United States existed (and where you sit right now), hundreds of distinct Indigenous nations inhabited this continent. The nation that followed was shaped by Indigenous peoples, European immigrants, enslaved Africans and their descendants, and successive generations of immigrants from around the world.
That diversity is not peripheral to the American story. It is a fundamental part of the American story.
It shaped our economy and workforce. It shaped our culture, arts, sciences, and institutions. Civil-rights movements led by Americans historically excluded from power forced this nation to more fully honor its constitutional promises. And America's ability to attract talent from around the world has contributed enormously to our leadership in science, technology, medicine, economic innovation, and national security.
So I ask: What could possibly be more fundamental than teaching students about Texas as it is, America as it is, and the world as it is—and preparing them for what all three are becoming?
Yet Texas A&M now appears intent on reshaping our classrooms, programs, and degrees to manufacture a preferred political worldview.
That is political interference in education.
Texas A&M should no more produce conservative students than liberal students.
Our job is not to manufacture a political worldview.
History will judge whether, when confronted with political pressure, this institution had the courage to remain a university—a public good that serves all citizens of this state.
Reject Agenda Item 4.1.