The United States military could not defeat 20,000 retarded brown sand people with Soviet-era AK-47s. There are at least 12 million able-bodied white men with guns who are sick of this shit. It would be over in a weekend. Imagine never seeing another dot head at Costco

Sep 20, 2026 · 8:45 PM UTC

175
348
5,721
74,506
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @itispsychomath
@itispsychomath you've been great lately but watch your mouth insulting the US Military. What a pathetic tweet gaslighting everyone into thinking we couldn't beat 20,000 idiots with AK-47s.
The United States military could not defeat 20,000 retarded brown sand people with Soviet-era AK-47s. There are at least 12 million able-bodied white men with guns who are sick of this shit. It would be over in a weekend. Imagine never seeing another dot head at Costco
29
22
8,131
Fuck the US military. It's full of fat black LaQuishas. It's mostly a welfare program for shitty dark skins. The few competent white men remaining in the US Military are zogbot goyim. If they haven't defected by now and stolen tanks and planes and guns and mortars, are they ever fucking going to? No. Obviously not. They will do whatever their Jew daddies tell them to until death. Why in the fuck would anyone respect a military that does not defend its country? Our country is full of disgusting mud monkeys that should have been dispatched on sight. Instead we pay them welfare.
10
25
520
4,930
Replying to @itispsychomath
And yet they aren't sick enough of it to donate money to pro-White organizations. Odd.
6
1
156
2,221
Replying to @itispsychomath
White men are too busy watching sports.
13
207
They didn’t want to defeat the brown sand people. They wanted to sap trillions from White families and kill off White fighting age men.
1
5
168
1,582
Replying to @itispsychomath
Afghanistan was not meant to be 'won' in the conventional sense. It was a cover for massive heroin trafficking. That's why it ended as soon as fentanyl became available.
1
2
50
681
Replying to @itispsychomath
The military absolutely could if it was allowed to fight a WAR. They aren't allowed to because it would include killing a lot of the "allies" that fuck kids, goats, and corpses. Unshackle the military from police actions and politicians and the world will know fear again.
3
1
48
998
Replying to @itispsychomath
It is what we are willing to do. It really isn’t that hard to wipe out an enemy. It’s just if we are willing to go full on berserk and do a ton of war crimes
6
2
46
1,550
Replying to @itispsychomath
The military won. What was the objective? It was never "wipe out taliban and everyone they ever met", because if that was the objective they would have done that also. The command structure lost because there was no win condition. It was just "drive around until someone shoots at you, repeat for 20 years".
1
2
44
927
Replying to @itispsychomath
It's only ever a question of will. The military never actually wants to defeat the "Sand People" as you say. In your scenario I believe the desire and will would be different.
25
835
Replying to @itispsychomath
The US military didnt even try. We are bound by a gay little thing commonly referred to as "international law" which meant we had to restrain ourselves from unleashing total war. We could exterminate any race on earth under the right leadership.
1
25
523
Replying to @itispsychomath
In a span of just 4 years: - Spends 4 trillion dollars on “defending the nation” - 22 million hostiles invade across the border What are we “defending”?
22
292
Replying to @itispsychomath
Control the food supply, control the people.
19
666
Replying to @itispsychomath
Violence is not necessary. Cut of their visas, benefits, and impose heavy prison time for fraud. Refuse to do business with them. They will go home.
4
17
438
Replying to @itispsychomath
That's because the United States military is also full of retarded browns
17
287
Replying to @itispsychomath
The US Military EASILY could have beat the brown sand people The politicians controlling the military REFUSED TO LET THEM However, those same politicians would easily give the orders to shoot civilians. However, the Military would ignore those orders
1
13
436
Replying to @itispsychomath
Repeal the ROE and things change drastically
1
11
439
Replying to @itispsychomath
In five days, the US offensive took more than 70% of Taliban-controlled territory, and within weeks the Taliban regime collapsed. At the beginning of the war, around 12,000 Taliban were killed and 7,000 captured. During all of Afghanistan, over 50,000 Taliban and other opposition fighters were killed versus 2400 US military deaths. A ratio of 20:1 In Iraq, Baghdad fell in 21 days, with roughly 4500–6000 Iraqi troops killed versus 103 American deaths — a ratio of 42:1 to 59:1 They were not beating the United States in battle
4
13
968
Replying to @itispsychomath
The war is fake and gay that's why. We need collective repentance first, the violence comes after that. Until then you will just face the full force of the beast system and get squashed like a bug. There is no cunning argumentation around this fact.
1
1
10
170
Replying to @itispsychomath
1- The military was and is much stronger than the Taliban 2- it wouldn’t be over in one weekend 3- most of those 12 million men aren’t a fighting force 4- what would convince American men to rebel is an authority figure that would convey more moral legitimacy than the peace under the current government. Genocidal rhetoric does the opposite
4
13
441
Replying to @itispsychomath
It wouldn’t even take a complete effort. Even 5-10% gone would strongly disincentivize the invaders. In the future would do the math before ever considering coming here. They would know the consequence. The rest of the ones already here would start to self deport en masse.
1
12
578
Replying to @itispsychomath
The armed forces were a little handicapped by the rules of engagement. If they had been cleared hot on flamethrowers, door to door mud hut clearance might have gone a little smoother. But yes totally time to clear out all the non-American scum.
10
654
Replying to @itispsychomath
It doesn't really make sense that yall lost Iraq because yall werent capable or something The founding of the US was up against the British military, which was one of the strongest military forces of that time. Americans won It's almost like the Iraq war was lost on purpose.
2
1
7
518
Replying to @itispsychomath
All I know is my niece and nephew are about to have kids. If a draft actually happened I'm protecting family. They will not draft my family and leave all these shitty legals and illegals. Those people can get sent but not my family
9
182
Replying to @itispsychomath
The Iraq war wasn’t unwinnable. Fallujah was a big W, but leadership changed after and their goals shifted to winning hearts and minds. Our hands were tied. Many preventable losses on our side.
3
9
1,004
Replying to @itispsychomath
And they will never pull the triggers because they know the social morality is antiwhite. YOU ARE RETARDED
1
5
276
Replying to @itispsychomath
They would need organization and coordination by a high IQ American Octavian/Napoleon. Someone who rose through the ranks through sheer competence and intelligence while pretending to be the biggest shill for Israel to avoid getting Mossad'd. He would be a man that the majority of the military respected and adored. He would have to build his coalition quietly while deployed away from the government eye, like Julius Caesar in Gaul. This figure could mobilize the millions disgruntled and disaffected American men into an army that can't be resisted.
6
257
Replying to @itispsychomath
There are too many woke white retards getting in the way of the mass jeet removal that needs to take place.
6
292
Replying to @itispsychomath
Organization is the problem. There is no way to organize 12 million. When a militia reaches 50 people its violently shut down.
1
5
621