jay retweeted
Replying to @LeadingReport
Too bad. You can download the camera list used on the map at flocksurveillance.org/data/c…
5
115
670
18,656
INBOX: Seniors at Nooksack High School in WA were reportedly given a presentation on the state's WAFSA program, which allows "non-citizens" to apply for taxpayer-funded student aid. They want to take your hard-earned dollars and give them to ILLEGAL ALIENS.
197
2,223
6,557
148,774
CNN & BBC Viewers had a shock this week - turning on the News and hearing US Director of Health RFK Jnr - confirm the Trump Administration “would investigate the effects of Chemtrails” So just in case you’re new to this, and only catching up - here is what they have been spraying on us all, all this time.
291
7,580
15,989
277,853
830
3,208
14,634
261,210
jay retweeted
Well look at this. March, 2021. CNN's Brian Stelter does a segment on if President Biden should remove Fox News from the White House Press Pool. Censorship for thee, just not for me.
912
9,920
26,886
1,683,725
I legitimately believed Trump was going to focus on the domestic problems we have. I live in a State where the Democrats rule. It’s not a “blue” state. It has cities where lefties consolidate & retain power by universal mail in ballots. No republican has won anything of significance since they started universal mail in ballots in 2011 The small victories we do win… We vote for $30 tabs, they say no We vote for using natural gas, they say no We vote for election security, they write laws to shield chain of custody, ballots, copies of ballots for 25 years We aren’t even allowed to know how our elections are secure.
What happened today in Washington state is terrifying. A single political party has consolidated so much power that not even voters can put a check on it.
280
730
3,198
63,225
jay retweeted
2,141
9,838
39,340
437,358
Brian Heywood of Let's Go Washington joins @jcurleyshow with what he calls the "biggest nuclear bomb hidden in the income tax," and it's aimed squarely at public employee pensions.
11
43
138
35,147
Bob Ferguson is spending four days behind closed doors with every major state agency leader, and his office is asking reporters to stay home. It's a taxpayer-funded government summit. What do you think they don't want you to see?
38
131
491
8,534
Fun fact: The $4.4B Washington State has to pay out for misconduct lawsuit settlements is more money than it is expected to collect from the state income tax ($2.7B-$3.7B) annually. Put another way, the state had to create a new tax which won’t even cover the size of its fuck ups. So rather than fixing government, Democrats are papering over damage with tax increase after tax increase.
26
148
803
25,019
WA State Supreme Court disenfranchises the voters and the initiative process ….Again Warning TLDR So much going on today… lets start here The WA Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn and ignore the vote and voice of over 2 million WA state voters who wanted to protect their access to clean natural gas. Some observations 1) The Supreme Court Ruling today is the third government branch to actively work to prevent voters from having a say in their government by kneecapping the initiative process -first the AG working for the Executive branch gets to write a convoluted ballot title seemingly designed to confuse voters -The legislature, in its grand wisdom decided to protect its unhealthy spending habits by forcing a financial impact statement on the ballot itself for each initiative that was designed to always say any initiative proposed will take money away from schools and children -More nefariously, the legislature proposed multiple bills this session to make it more difficult to collect signatures, make the process more expensive, and intimidate volunteers with a higher standard of record keeping than our own state requires for voting -Now we get to the WA Supreme court, not for the first time, ruling against the voters — disenfranchsing 2 million voters, over 52% of the voting population who clearly voted to protect their access to natural gas 2) The Supreme court also seems to have done something designed to further put their thumb on the election - One of the judges making the ruling (Barbara Madsen) retired at the end of March which means this decision was made almost 6 months ago - The decision was held and was not released until today weeks before ballots drop- why would that be? -Curiously today also featured a press release by the pro income tax crowd trying to throw shade on our initiative drafting process (we used one of the top attorneys in the state as well as one of the top tax specialists to carefully draft the initiative by the way) claiming the initiative was poorly constructed (hmm why was that release today, the same day the court overturned 2066 the natural gas initiative? -In a total Koinkidink, the No on 001 crowd also held a press conference this morning to once again claim an initiative was poorly written..,. 3) If i wanted to cause damage to voters who are likely to support the initiatives on the ballot, on of the most devastating weapons i could unleash is to cause those voters to believe that it doesn’t really matter whether they vote or not — it doesn’t really matter whether the initiative wins or not, the Supreme Court will just over turn the will of the people… again…. I am sure all of this just miraculously happened today with no coordination on message whatsoever by the Supreme Court, the Governor, the legislature, the Public Unions, and the vote no campaigns…. Totally happy coincidence… Push back. Fight back. Vote Yes on all of the Initiatives The Judges And when it comes to judges, here are the 6 who voted to disenfranchise you • Chief Justice Debra L. Stephens (Up for re-election) • Justice Steven C. González • Justice Raquel Montoya-Lewis (Retiring in Dec. open seat) • Justice G. Helen Whitener • Justice Colleen M. Melody (Up for election) • Justice Barbara A. Madsen, J.P.T. (Retired) Debra Stephens and Colleen Melody are both up for election on the ballot this year… if i were filling out my ballot and trying to figure out who to vote for, i would start out by not voting for either of those two. seattletimes.com/seattle-new…
22
107
241
3,412
There’s a consistent pattern from our Washington State reps. They overturn any vote by the people they don’t like Oh you guys want natural gas? Nah. Oh you want $30 car tabs… nah. Oh you want election security? How about we send out universal mail in ballots & block anybody from seeing the chain of custody, ballots, copies of ballots, or anything election related. We run on a “trust me bro” system & if we vote for change in our favor, they turn around and say we don’t have the right to make that choice. They claim to be holding your hand but reality is they’re hitting you with it.
The WA State Supreme Court has overturned the will of the people in I-2066, the initiative to protect natural gas use in WA. Once again, the Court used the "single-subject rule" as its justification for denying the people's voice. And the right they retain in the State Constitution. This rule has become the default excuse the Court uses when it has no good reason to reject a people's initiative. This use of the "single-subject rule" is intellectually lazy and dishonest. But it's something sponsors of initiatives have to anticipate. We did that effectively with I-2081 (the original WA Parents' Bill of Rights), I-2111 (no state income tax) and I-2113 (restore police pursuits)--which all passed court scrutiny. In WA, writing an initiative is similar to writing legislation. But not exactly the same. The State Supreme Court applies different standards of review. That's not right, but it's reality. This fall, vote for Edwards, Stevens, O'Donnell, Larson and Bloom to the WA State Supreme Court. They will respect the State Constitution and the initiative process. (Four screenshots of excerpts from the decision against I-2066. Plus a link below to the complete decision.) courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1…
170
645
2,474
36,393
The WA State Supreme Court has overturned the will of the people in I-2066, the initiative to protect natural gas use in WA. Once again, the Court used the "single-subject rule" as its justification for denying the people's voice. And the right they retain in the State Constitution. This rule has become the default excuse the Court uses when it has no good reason to reject a people's initiative. This use of the "single-subject rule" is intellectually lazy and dishonest. But it's something sponsors of initiatives have to anticipate. We did that effectively with I-2081 (the original WA Parents' Bill of Rights), I-2111 (no state income tax) and I-2113 (restore police pursuits)--which all passed court scrutiny. In WA, writing an initiative is similar to writing legislation. But not exactly the same. The State Supreme Court applies different standards of review. That's not right, but it's reality. This fall, vote for Edwards, Stevens, O'Donnell, Larson and Bloom to the WA State Supreme Court. They will respect the State Constitution and the initiative process. (Four screenshots of excerpts from the decision against I-2066. Plus a link below to the complete decision.) courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1…
194
598
1,695
72,325
jay retweeted
The No side didn’t just write a bad argument. They wrote a lie into the voters’ pamphlet. Future expansions “would be decided on the ballot.” That’s not how this tax works. The Legislature can lower the $1 million line the same way it created the tax: simple majority, Governor’s signature. Voters get a say this once because an initiative forced the question. And now the official PDF makes the against column darker and taller than the for column. Olympia wrote the tax. Olympia wrote the brochure. Then Olympia stacked the page. Read the statute. Don’t trust the pamphlet. Vote YES on I-645.
Did you all see this? In the repeal the #WA Income Tax voters statement... The against statement appears both physically darker in the .pdf & just a bit taller in text.
9
49
121
18,245
John Curley covering a story the Seattle Times is pretending doesn’t exist. Your retirement account is now subject to the WA state unconstitutional income tax. Oh and I might be on the show talking about it … podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
14
120
518
19,278
Brad Smith just called payroll taxes an existential threat to WA jobs. Minutes later, Jamie Pedersen told the room: either kill I-645 (our income tax repeal) or we might have to talk about that payroll tax again. Microsoft's response? A smile. This is a shakedown by a criminal enterprise (don’t want to insult the mafia by comparing them to Jamie) There is probably no more dangerous creature than a fundamentally weak man like Jamie who has been given enormous power… I suspect Brad you are not doing microsoft, your employees, or the state any favors by your collaboration with your captors…. And while I am not a betting man i would put money on the fact that there is a very specific tax either payroll or corporate income with your name on it already in chamber…. Help us save the state Vote Yes on I-645 to repeal the income tax
79
211
867
76,923
Washington last in is percentage of total financial reserve to tax revenue. DEAD last of all the states. Yet @GovBobFerguson and @washdems refuse to address the out of control spending. They just say we need more revenue to pay for their pet projects and union funding. WA Democrats are working hard to bankrupt the state.
21
175
510
7,772
Dear President Trump, The elections are manipulated by the States software that clerks download on their laptops before an election, and corrupt voter rolls filled with faux registrations that cannot be verified, removed, or audited. There is no auditable trail saved as clerks are directed to destroy the record in first chain of custody of our elections. •More poll watchers at precincts are not going to catch the steal. •Checking internet connectivity is not going to catch the steal, as Michigan has 9 days of early voting now, with constant clerk-State voter roll connection. •USPS barcodes and verifying address delivery won’t catch the steal, when faux ballots are dropped in drop boxes. We have a national state of emergency. Many election officials need prosecuted and imprisoned. @POTUS @elonmusk @ODNIgov @timlovesann @PeterBernegger @ZarkFiles @JamesOKeefeIII @JovanHPulitzer
101
993
2,125
205,062
I paid $3.79 in Florida for gas yesterday. If you're paying $6, blame your state legislators for taxing you into oblivion.
1,760
2,082
14,429
452,994
This appears to be illegal. @DrOzCMS @POTUS @DOJFraudDiv @TheJusticeDept In fact, it appears to be an act of sedition against the laws of the United States. Can you please arrest my Governor?
Here's how Washington state is responding to President Trump's Medicaid cuts in the Big Bad Betrayal Bill. Through extensive outreach to immigrant communities, we've helped 3,000 Washington immigrants update their information to keep their health care coverage. We're leading the nation in building an automated verification hub for work requirements that we expect will help 400,000 Washingtonians stay on Apple Health. My new executive order directs the continuation of those efforts. It also establishes the H.R. 1 Continuous Medicaid Response Committee to monitor coverage disruptions and coordinate on opportunities for state action. I directed the Department of Health to develop a data accountability system to track who is losing coverage, and where there are gaps, so the state can take additional action and understand the true impact of H.R. 1 in our state. I also directed DSHS to work with philanthropic organizations and other partners to expand the capacity and reach of the state. I appreciate all of our partners who have rolled up their sleeves to help Washingtonians.
15
39
205
6,278