O cofundador do Claude sentou hoje entre cardeais no Vaticano e disse ao Papa: minha indústria opera com incentivos que conflitam com fazer a coisa certa. O Papa olhou para ele e respondeu: "Em nome da Igreja, aceito seu convite para caminharmos juntos." Aconteceu há horas. Leão XIV apresentou a "Magnifica Humanitas": a primeira encíclica papal da história dedicada a uma tecnologia específica. O Papa quebrou séculos de tradição para apresentar o documento pessoalmente. Nenhum papa tinha feito isso antes. E escolheu como convidado o cofundador do lab de IA notavelmente ausente dos contratos militares do Pentágono. A Anthropic se recusou a liberar seus modelos para armas autônomas e vigilância doméstica. O que Olah disse diante de cardeais, teólogos e do líder de 1,4 bilhão de católicos: "Todo lab de IA opera dentro de incentivos que podem entrar em conflito com fazer a coisa certa." Pressão comercial, competitiva e geopolítica. E "as pressões mais antigas e mais simples: orgulho e ambição." A conclusão dele: "As questões levantadas pela IA são maiores que a comunidade de pesquisa em IA." Precisamos de críticos externos sérios e honestos. Agora o documento. A abertura coloca a humanidade diante de duas escolhas: construir uma nova Torre de Babel ou reconstruir Jerusalém. A frase que define a encíclica: "A inteligência artificial precisa ser desarmada." Leão XIV sabe que a palavra é forte. Escolheu de propósito. Parágrafo 110: → "Desarmar a IA significa libertá-la da mentalidade de competição armada, não apenas militar, mas econômica e cognitiva" → "Uma corrida por algoritmos cada vez mais poderosos, movida pelo desejo de dominância geopolítica ou comercial" → "Desarmar não significa rejeitar a tecnologia, mas impedir que ela domine a humanidade" E depois: "Simplesmente regulá-la é insuficiente." O Papa não está pedindo regulação. Está dizendo que regulação não basta. → "A IA amplifica o poder de quem já possui recursos econômicos, expertise e acesso a dados" → O risco não é alguém acreditar que conversa com uma pessoa ao usar IA. É perder o desejo de buscar outras pessoas. → "Toda escolha de design reflete uma visão de humanidade" (parágrafo 111) A simbologia foi calculada em cada detalhe: → Documento assinado em 15 de maio, aniversário exato da Rerum Novarum (1891), a resposta de Leão XIII à Revolução Industrial → O Papa disse explicitamente: "Como o Leão anterior, sinto-me encarregado de olhar para outra enorme transformação com olhos de fé" → A Igreja faz isso a cada grande ruptura: Rerum Novarum (1891), Pacem in Terris (1963, era nuclear), Laudato Si' (2015, clima), agora Magnifica Humanitas Fazer da IA a primeira encíclica do pontificado é dizer que nenhum outro assunto é mais urgente. Agora conecta os pontos. O primeiro Papa americano da história está em conflito aberto com a Casa Branca. Ele traz ao palco do Vaticano o cofundador do único lab de IA que enfrentou o governo Trump em defesa de limites éticos. E juntos publicam um documento de 42.300 palavras dizendo que a tecnologia mais poderosa já criada pela humanidade não pode ficar nas mãos de quem lucra com ela. Teologia e geopolítica na mesma mesa. Literalmente. Quem constrói a IA não pode ser quem define as regras da IA. O Papa e o cara que constrói a IA concordaram nisso hoje. No Vaticano. Diante do mundo.

“Pope Leo was a math major? I wonder what his encyclicals will be like” Like this

My latest nomination for a member of the Fear Mafia You know, those folks who work to get you all fearful because they all of a sudden have this inside information. The stuff that they’re keeping from you. That causes you to do things that are going to make your life worse

In March the Pentagon designated Anthropic a supply chain risk for refusing to allow Claude to be used for autonomous weapons or mass surveillance of American citizens. In April the Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve Chair convened the chief executives of the five largest American banks in an emergency closed-door meeting at Treasury headquarters to address cybersecurity risks of Anthropic’s new model. On Friday OpenAI filed confidentially for an initial public offering and Bloomberg reported that Anthropic is closing the largest private funding round in venture capital history this week at a nine hundred billion dollar valuation. The lab the executive branch tried to disqualify is about to be valued at more than the top five American defense contractors combined. The model is called Claude Mythos. Anthropic announced it on April seventh and immediately chose not to release it commercially. Mythos can autonomously identify and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser, including a twenty-seven year old bug in OpenBSD that had survived decades of expert review. On a Firefox benchmark it converted discovered vulnerabilities into working exploits one hundred and eighty-one times, against two for Anthropic’s prior frontier model. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell pulled the CEOs of Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs out of other meetings to address the risk. On Thursday President Trump was scheduled to sign an executive order creating a voluntary frontier-model review regime for capabilities of the kind Mythos demonstrated. Hours before the ceremony Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and former White House AI advisor David Sacks called the President directly. The order was killed. OpenAI had publicly supported it. Anthropic, the lab that triggered the order, did not attend the signing. Per Axios sources, Trump “just hates regulation.” Anthropic’s revenue trajectory is the steepest in the history of American technology. At end of 2025 annualized revenue was nine billion dollars. At the end of March 2026 it was thirty billion. By June 2026 it is projected at fifty billion. Second quarter revenue is projected at ten point nine billion dollars, more than doubling first quarter. First operating profit is expected at five hundred and fifty-nine million dollars. Claude Code alone generates two point five billion in annualized revenue. Anthropic instead routed Mythos into Project Glasswing, a private defensive coalition that scans and patches critical infrastructure before adversaries can exploit it. The members are Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorgan Chase, the Linux Foundation, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palo Alto Networks. These companies operate the digital substrate of the United States. The Pentagon’s supply chain risk is now the central node of US critical infrastructure defense. The same federal government that designated Anthropic a supply chain risk in March made Anthropic the financial system’s cybersecurity reference in April. The same administration that excluded Anthropic for refusing autonomous lethal weapons watched its President postpone an AI safety order targeting Mythos at the request of three executives lobbying hardest against any safety regime. The same market that priced OpenAI at eight hundred fifty-two billion dollars with one dollar twenty-two cents lost per dollar of revenue is pricing Anthropic at nine hundred billion with first-ever profit. The Pentagon’s exclusion list is more valuable than the Pentagon’s procurement list. The supply chain risk is the supply chain.

Oh, get off your moral high horse The GOP opposed and blocked anti-gerrymandering bills multiple times in the last decade And when the GOP can gerrymander- can you say TX, FL, NC, Ohio, GA, TN, SC, UT, etc. - they do it.

Dear @MeghanMcCain I agreed gerrymandering is a crime against civil governance But explain why Republicans have opposed every attempt to ban it at the Federal level? And where is your outrage when it is practiced in Red States like Texas and Alabama?

He will betray anyone and everyone No honor

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” - Theodore Roosevelt Why believe UnAmerican things? @MAGAMAHACindy

Anyone who calls themselves a follower of Christ and who backs Trump after this, really needs to ask themselves what it means to be a Christian

What was that about them just going after the violent and bad hombres?

the more I've been digging into the new Figma MCP, the more excited I am about it something new I'm trying is starting with a very ugly sketch in Figma, and then having Claude Code flesh it out in Figma so I can tweak and edit before sending the final back to Claude Code

A man with no official title, no confirmed role, and no public accountability allegedly walked into DHS and started running a pay-to-play scheme with BILLION-dollar contracts.    His name is Corey Lewandowski. Multiple companies say they were pressured to pay him or risk losing government contracts. And guess what? Trump knew and did nothing to stop it.     Welcome to Episode 10 of the Corruption Chronicles.

BREAKING: Russia shared satellite images of Prince Sultan US base in Saudi with Iran right before their attack that injured our troops. Ukrainian intel confirms it. Meanwhile Trump refuse to condemn Russia. Is this what you voted for?

At Newburgh in 1783, Washington walked into a room of soldiers who wanted to march on Congress and install him as a constitutional monarch. He reached into his pocket for his eyeglasses — the calculated theater of a man who understood exactly what the moment required — and said he had grown not only gray but nearly blind in the service of his country. Some men broke into tears. The conspiracy died in that room. Nichols asks us to sit with what Washington chose not to do in that moment. A lesser man, he writes, would have nodded and taken the throne. Washington had the army, the love of the citizenry, and a government too weak to stop him. He chose to go home instead. Trump stood in Arlington National Cemetery and looked at the graves of the honored dead and said: “I don’t get it. What was in it for them?” He said that in the same country, about the same army, whose commander-in-chief he was. The distance between those two men is not partisan. It is the entire argument for why the republic was designed the way it was.

Let me tell you exactly what Fox figured out in 1993. Roger Ailes looked around and asked — who’s the threat? Not Bill Clinton, the threat is Hillary Clinton. They spent billions of dollars over decades destroying her narrative. By the time she ran for president 51% of the country had a negative opinion of her before she said a word on the campaign trail. That’s the playbook. Now ask yourself — where’s the threat today? California. The fourth largest economy in the world. Agriculture, Defense, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, AI. — which is literally the exportation of American culture globally. A politician coming out of California from the left could beat the right decisively. So what do you do? Spend billions destroying the narrative around California. Make it synonymous with crime and homelessness and radical politics. Do it for two or three decades until the brand is toxic. Newsom has an image problem today the exact same way Hillary had an image problem. It was manufactured. Deliberately. Systematically.

GStack now learns from how you develop and tries to apply that learning to future runs. Keep hitting N+1s? CLI have weird flags that keep tripping you up? Each iteration, we learn, and we can get better from here. (Inspired by Compound Engineering by Every, thank you!)

Okay I think I finally found a good use for @_chenglou 's Pretext. A resume builder that always fits on one page with realtime rendering.

My dear front-end developers (and anyone who’s interested in the future of interfaces): I have crawled through depths of hell to bring you, for the foreseeable years, one of the more important foundational pieces of UI engineering (if not in implementation then certainly at least in concept): Fast, accurate and comprehensive userland text measurement algorithm in pure TypeScript, usable for laying out entire web pages without CSS, bypassing DOM measurements and reflow