I increased monday,com’s traffic by 1,570% via SEO. I compiled 4hrs of video showing the exact strategy. Like + Reply with 👋 and I’ll DM it to you for free, right now. (I’ve lead SEO for 100+ SaaS startups)

Despite reading AI search and SEO content every day, I rarely read any new finding or discovery that results in actually doing something new or different, strategically.

Step 1. Find companies who can afford you Step 2. Do badass shit for them that produces such a huge ROI they stay for years and create massive LTV Step 3. Find more like them Has been my playbook since I started @userp_io and don't plan on stopping now!

If you believe this just wire me your life savings, you’ll end up in the same spot just without wasting your time, too!

47-58% of our leads in any given month come from AI search. Haven’t done any “content engineering.” Haven’t done any “consensus engineering” Haven’t chunked a single article on site. Literally just built a brand over 9 years doing good SEO and what do you know….

“GEO agencies” discovered a genius new pricing strategy: Rename “content marketing” to “content engineering.” Charge 5x more.

It’s amazing the amount of jargon bull shit surrounding GEO. Literally looked at the landing page of one of the leading “geo agencies” and everything is called “engineering” yet the description of activities and deliverables is no different than their SEO pages. 🤒🤒🤒

Everyone is an engineer now because their employer gave them a Claude subscription 😂

“AI is running our entire SEO and GEO strategy.” The AI:

We’ve seen a 2x increase in lead volume per month, attributed entirely to AI search. We already had more leads than we could take on, and AI search has dumped 27+ more per month on our calendar. The catch? 99% are trash. Lazy. Zero intent. No affinity. Bad leads.

This company was just acquired for FIVE BILLION and they can't hire smart enough talent to realize that building 90% exact match backlinks is a bad idea?

Claude got 10x worse and it instantly exposed how many people are already over reliant on AI.

True also of SEO, at least in AIs current state. AI is designed to sound smart. If you do not actually know what you’re doing, it makes you believe you do. The amount of sales leads I speak to on a monthly basis who clearly have a ChatGPT generated list of questions is astonishing. Asking all of the generic basic irrelevant questions that reveal, to anyone with strong expertise, a lack of expertise. We’ve been told that “AGI is already here” and “AI is taking your job tomorrow” — it’s only natural that people believe AI is already failure proof. It’s so incredibly far from it. Anyone with deep experience in their space knows this. And this wave of DIYers who think AI can replace everything they pay for is in for a rude awakening. I’m already seeing this BTW. MANY conversations each month and new clients SOLELY because they’ve tried to automate SEO and trusted an “SEO plan” from Claude etc, only to have no results, or worse results than they previously had. If you are truly an expert at what you do, you are going to make so much money fixing AI issues caused by poor operators, managing AI for you skill set in a business, or implementing it for others. Expertise is more valuable than ever.

TLDR: Headings, no fluffy content to hit word counts, FAQs, EEAT. So, good SEO! Also, citations are not a great metric IMO. Across 65+ clients, almost no measurable impact comes from citations, mostly from mentions at BOFU. Interesting regardless! hostinger.com/uk/tutorials/a…

Genuinely so glad people believe this absolute nonsense. Makes me so much more money in multiple ways: 1. My competition is ai slop lords who have no clue how to drive actual enterprise value with SEO — “more content gooder” is literally my competition 😭 2. Companies come to me needing someone to fix the massive mess this strategy always creates, I rightfully charge a lot for it 3. Links become more and more and more important by the second as it’s the only SEO lever that will never be automated I get stoked when I see more people believing this stuff!

I talk to 35 new companies every month about SEO and GEO. Almost all of them are making the same data mistake...and they're building 2026 budgets around it. They all say the same thing: "AI search leads are so much better." When I ask how they arrived at that conclusion, it's always the same story: They're comparing all of their Google organic traffic, for example 200k visits a month across every funnel stage, to AI search leads, which are almost exclusively bottom of funnel. Of course the AI leads convert better. You're comparing apples to burgers. Here's what actually happened over the last 12 months and why your data is sh**. CTR and traffic dropped massively for tons of keywords. Yet revenue from organic search stayed flat. Why? Because most of what you were ranking for was vanity top-of-funnel junk that never moved the needle. Broad, informational keywords now eaten up by AI overviews and LLMs. Zero-click searches (hat tip / coined by @amandanat!). You didn't lose revenue, just vanity traffic that never made a difference in the first place. Now look at AI search: Brands nearly only get mentioned when someone asks for a specific solution. "I run a small business and need payroll services, what's a good fit for a 10 employee company?" The LLM spits out 5-6 tools. That's it. That's the only time you show up. It's as bottom of funnel as it gets. So when you compare 200k monthly organic visits where maybe 2,000 are meaningfully contributing to revenue against a channel that is ONLY purchase-intent recommendations, what exactly are you measuring? Nothing useful. Without proper data filtering, you can't make this comparison. And if you're making resource allocation decisions without it, you're making a huge mistake. GEO and SEO are not the same when it comes to data, intent, and usage. Stop treating their numbers like they're interchangeable.

No they are not. This absolute garbage content is parroted by people who clearly have no experience and have made zero money in SEO for themselves or their clients. Any real SEO who actually has driven results is not worried about Claude “scoring content for AI citation readiness” as a replacement for $12k/mo services. Genuinely hilarious when people post this kind of content. It’s an instant tell that they lack any experience whatsoever.