JCN is dedicated to strengthening liberty and justice in America.

District of Columbia
🚨NEW VIDEO 🚨 President Biden’s judicial nominees are unfit and unqualified to serve. Americans deserve the best legal minds upholding the rule of law and defending the Constitution on the federal bench – and they are not getting that with President Biden’s judicial nominees.
142
293
1,068
121,165
In a piece previewing Suncor v. Boulder, @imillhiser charges that the energy companies are “thumbing their nose” at the justices’ “purported allegiance to textualism and originalism.” Really? That would certainly be news to the late Justice Scalia. What's “audacious” is pretending that textualists and originalists, from Justice Scalia on, didn’t see founding-era structural limits as central to constitutional interpretation.
2
9
17
7,730
“Every organization should be free to hire people who believe in its mission, and that is especially true for religious groups. When the government strips that right from them, no organization is safe, and ultimately, ‘We The People’ suffer.” - @LathanWatts nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
2
186
Next Monday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Suncor v. Boulder and have an opportunity to reaffirm that neither a state nor a municipality may govern the nation. “If global carbon emissions are contributing to a changing climate, it is up to Congress, not a local courtroom, to determine the appropriate response. Boulder County’s abuse of state tort law to regulate the world’s emissions is unconstitutional.” - Christopher Mills washingtonexaminer.com/resto…
2
7
24
1,273
I commend these two thoughtful pieces on Suncor v. Boulder from @mike_frags on @NRO. 👇🏻
I have a post up at @NRO on two recent articles on the Suncor case. One, by me, was recently published at HJLPP on how the Boulder plaintiffs are seeking "judicial collectivization" and their position represents the most glaring arrogation of judicial power since Earl Warren. 👇
1
3
8
2,674
Tune in today to @Heritage’s panel at 6 p.m. to hear JCN President @JCNSeverino discuss the most significant cases expected before the Court this term.
What will the Supreme Court's 2026-2027 term mean for our future? Tune in online tomorrow at 6 p.m. as @tzsmith and @JCNSeverino break down the most significant cases expected before the Court. Our speakers will unpack the latest developments on the Court's emergency docket and dive into the legal battles that could influence everything from religious liberty to environmental regulation and criminal justice. RSVP: app.webinar.net/146VnRYeK8P
1
2
2,111
ICYMI: The Education Department now holds the ABA’s future in its hands after a deadlocked panel failed to decide whether to strip the law school accreditor of its gatekeeping status. "The ABA's leadership has made it clear, publicly and otherwise, that it will return to its unlawful ideological agenda at its first opportunity." - @America1stLegal's Reed Rubinstein foxnews.com/politics/far-lef…
1
309
The American Bar Association has a long history of acting more like a left-wing advocacy organization rather than a professional legal organization. It should come as no surprise that it is facing demands to meet independence standards if it wants to act as the nation's sole law school accreditor. More from @chad_mizelle on the @usedgov’s consideration of the ABA's federal recognition:
3
67
304
31,467
No other court has worked harder to avoid enforcing the Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen than the Ninth Circuit. The Court should add Yukutake v. Lopez to its Second Amendment docket. Read the latest from JCN President @JCNSeverino to learn more. 👇 nationalreview.com/bench-mem…
1
1
3
297
“Whether through tort, fraud, wrongful death, or criminal charges, the climate plaintiffs will stop at nothing to advance their agenda. When the justices write their opinion in Suncor, they should close the door firmly on climate lawfare and leave the activists driving this campaign nothing to pry it back open.” dailysignal.com/2026/09/25/t…
1
2
289
Must Read: Another Try for Religious Charter Schools wsj.com/opinion/ben-gamla-je…
215
Justice Clarence Thomas has been a steadfast originalist voice on the Supreme Court for decades. We are lucky to have his leadership and judicial prudence on the highest court in the land.
By any measure, Justice Clarence Thomas is one of the most consequential judges ever to serve on the Supreme Court. He has been the leading expositor of originalism: when you interpret the Constitution, you are governed by the ordinary meaning of its words when they were adopted. And on race, his early dissents argued that government discrimination based on race is always wrong. Decades later, those lonely dissents have become majority opinions as the Court has followed the path traced by Clarence Thomas. Order now at goingfurther.com
1
4
440
“Aspiring doctors should be admitted based on their qualifications. The Supreme Court has spoken clearly — federally funded medical schools may not admit students based on misguided and illegal notions of diversity.” - @AAGDhillon nationalreview.com/news/doj-…
3
4
335
ICYMI: Solicitor General John Sauer asked the Supreme Court to take up Genalo v. D.C. and decide whether illegal aliens facing deportation are entitled to bond hearings. "It's often a situation where people are playing both sides of it... they're asking for more time on different things, but then at the same time complaining that the whole process is taking too long." -JCN President @JCNSeverino foxnews.com/politics/trump-r…
1
7
441