Police officers who tasered amputee pensioner, 92, sacked for using excessive force gbnews.com/news/sussex-polic…

Can the English Constitution save us from the coming civil war? Graham Moore @englishexit explains how it would all work. Does England deserve to be a country?

In 1967 Britain had more electric vehicles on its roads than every other country on earth put together, and they were all delivering milk. There were tens of thousands of them. The milk float: open sided, battery under the floor, top speed of about 15 miles an hour, and a whine you could pick out in your sleep. It was charged overnight at the depot and was back there by lunchtime. It carried glass bottles. Each one was collected from your step the next morning, washed and refilled. A bottle went round like that 20 or 30 times before it broke. The foil cap went for scrap. There was no other packaging. The milk had come from farms within a few miles, through a local dairy, and was on the step before 7. So here is what the country had. A zero-emission delivery fleet. Reusable containers with a return rate any modern scheme would kill for. No plastic. A supply chain you could cycle the length of. A man who noticed if an old lady's bottles were piling up, and knocked. It was dismantled in about 15 years, because a supermarket could sell milk a few pence cheaper in a plastic jug as a way of getting you through the door. Every piece of that system is now the subject of a government target for 2040. It was running in 1967, silently, in the dark, and nobody thought it was worth a mention.

To add further weight to what @ABridgen said. Primary constitutional statutes such as this are not your run of the mill Acts of Parliament. They are agreed compacts between the Monarch and People enshrined in law. They contain confirmation of the establishment of specific Rights and Liberties of our People and limitations on how we are to be governed, be it expressly by the King, or, by his Government. All of which is given the force of law. The Bill of Rights is in essence the Declaration of Rights set in law. To look at the Bill of Rights from the correct perspective, all you need do is to understand the above, and that the 'Bill of Rights' is the short title given to that enacted compact at a later date. It was originally know by its description of what it does; 'An Act for the further Limitation of the Crown and better securing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject'. Nowhere does it say the Rights of Parliament or the Rights of the Government, does it! It wouldn't, because it is a compact between the Sovereign and our English People. A restating of the 'original contract'. It is OUR RIGHT that a Parliament exists for OUR benefit as expressly stated, 'for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws,'; not for a rogue State to redefine what the existence of a Parliament means in that compact, to then arbitrarily enact legislation that suppresses our Rights and Liberties that the very same text established. That is constitutional subversion of the very worse kind, and even attempting to subvert our Constitution has in the past been worthy of the loss of one's life. See the Cato Street Conspiracy for example. The Coronation Oath Act is explicit in that the Monarch is to solemnly swear to not only govern by our Law, but by STATUTES AGREED ON. The Bill of Rights is one such statute to which that statement is referring. 'Now in pursuance of the premisses, the said lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, in parliament assembled, for the ratifying, confirming and establishing the said declaration, and the articles, clauses, matters, and things therein contained, by the force of a law made in due form by authority of parliament, do pray that it may be declared and enacted, That all and singular the rights and liberties asserted and claimed in the said declaration, are the true, ancient, and indubitable rights and liberties of the people of this kingdom, and so shall be esteemed, allowed, adjudged, deemed, and taken to be, and that all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed, as they are expressed in the said declaration; and all officers and ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majesties and their successors according to the same in all times to come.' There is no doubt that by giving Royal Assent (consent) to this, and by the reply after having been read the Declaration, that this Statute was most definitely agreed to. 'Day 15 February 1688. His majesties Gracious answer to the Declaration of both houses. My Lords and Gentlemen This is certainly the greatest proof of the trust that you have in us that can be given which is the thing that maketh us value it the more and we thankfully accept what you have offered. And as I had no other intention of coming hither than to preserve your Religion, Laws and Liberties so you may be sure that I shall endeavour to support them and shall be willing to concur in anything that shall be for the good of the Kingdom and to do all that is in my power to advance the welfare and glory of the nation.' By understanding our English Constitution we have all the tools we need to de-legitimise all that is being done to our People and to halt the Wilful destruction of our ancient civilisation. @englishexit @RestoreBritain @AllForEnglandHQ

Restore Britain’s next aim is to achieve the biggest political party membership in Wales. We’re now second in Scotland, we can go one better in Wales. Welsh patriots finally have a genuine political home in Restore Britain.

England for the English! English, Welsh, Irish and Scottish are Nations. Ethnonationalists are constitutionally (lawfully) correct. Marxists used the term “useful idiots” like the 20% of Russians that still call themselves “Soviet” even though the union is gone. They can’t see they've been indoctrinated. Brainwashed. People like them are the problem. In our case the union (1706/1707) did not impose a union nationality on us. The British Nationality Act 1948 did and it came via the union parliament. The usurpation is British.