Time to cook. For safety purposes I don't open DMs. Thank you for your attention on this critical matter. 🤌 Hyperliquid.

Ruzzi11 retweeted
The bull case for HyperEVM tokens. Hyperliquid has a unique problem: its users and believers are too bullish on hyperliquid:native. The prevailing view is simple: "Why own any other token when you can own HYPE — the best asset in the ecosystem and the one where you get exposure to the entire thing?" HYPE's strength is a black hole. Its gravitational pull sucks momentum from any ecosystem tokens that is nearly impossible to escape. Gains, airdrops, profits etc. all tend to rotate back into the main character. That has been true for both memecoins like purr-2:native as well as for actual protocols like kinetiq:native. They can run but breakouts rarely sustain as HYPE re-absorbs excess capital. But Season 3 might be the one event that reverses that flow. For once, a large amount of wealth will rotate away from HYPE rather than toward HYPE. Some recipients will sell and diversify into Bitcoin. Some will hold cash. Some will use portfolio margin to create additional working capital and and increase leveraged exposure into a rising market, including into HYPE itself. But I think the place a material chunk of capital will find itself is in HyperEVM, which only needs to capture a small portion of the total liquidity event. These are low market cap and thinly traded assets we're talking about. A flurry of six-figure buys would materially move prices. Those moves draw attention and attention attracts further outside capital. More on outside capital... The airdrop itself will also be the (first or second) largest marketing events in Hyperliquid’s history. What message is more powerful than: "Tens of thousands of ordinary people just became millionaires by being early and aligned with this ecosystem. Why not you?" People will pour in through the floodgates looking for the next best opportunities within the ecosystem. They will look at HyperEVM protocols, buy ecosystem tokens and begin positioning for the next big incentive, even if one is never explicitly promised. So here's the reflexive sequence. Season 3 distributes wealth → some wealth flows into HyperEVM → thin markets move sharply → rising prices attract attention and new capital → speculation around the next opportunity grows. To me, this is how HyperEVM develops, over the medium-term, a broader, self-sustaining token economy outside of HYPE.
8
6
54
2,754
Ruzzi11 retweeted
Reasons why I think a second Hyperliquid airdrop is very likely: > Jeff clearly values decentralization. Right now, less than 50% of the supply is in the hands of the community, that’s something he’ll likely want to change ASAP. > The 38.888% allocation explicitly says “future emissions and COMMUNITY REWARDS.” It would make little sense to phrase it that way if it only referred to staking emissions. > Around 4% of the first airdrop went unclaimed. Those tokens were originally intended for community distribution via airdrop, so repurposing them to staking emissions would not make much sense. > Hyperliquid’s user base has grown massively since the first airdrop. A huge number of organic users still don’t own any HYPE at all. There are only 282k $HYPE holders on Hyperliquid. > Retroactive airdrops may have a legal advantage under the SEC’s new crypto framework: rewarding past activity with no prior promise may avoid being treated as an investment contract, while announced points campaigns tied to future trading or tasks could face more regulatory risk. So if Hyperliquid wanted to reward users, it may actually have an incentive to say nothing and do it retroactively. Hyperliquid
27
13
213
25,296
Hyperliquid
7
235
Give or take 3 years.
3
18
800
HYPE ATH / BTC HYPE ATH / ETH Hyperliquid.
13
647
All your markets are belong to @HyperliquidX
HyperCore will support outcome trading (HIP-4). Outcomes are fully collateralized contracts that settle within a fixed range. They are a general-purpose primitive that are useful for applications such as prediction markets and bounded options-like instruments. There has been extensive user demand in both of these areas, and builders will likely think of novel applications as well. Outcomes bring non-linearity, dated contracts, and an alternative form of derivative trading that does not involve leverage or liquidations. The outcome primitive expands the expressivity of HyperCore, while composing with other primitives such as portfolio margin and the HyperEVM. Outcomes are a work in progress and currently only being tested on testnet. Canonical markets based on objective settlement sources will be deployed once technical development is complete. Canonical markets will be denominated in USDH. Pending user feedback, the infrastructure will be extended to permissionless deployment.
2
10
672
Binance will go through this and be like ‘This is FUD 👍’ while absolutely obliterating the market (which hasn’t been the same since 10/10) and made users randomly lose 20 billion over a few hours Hyperliquid
No complexity. No accident. 10/10 was caused by irresponsible marketing campaigns by certain companies. On October 10, tens of billions of dollars were liquidated. As CEO of OKX, we observed clearly that the crypto market’s microstructure fundamentally changed after that day. Many industry participants believe the damage was more severe than the FTX collapse. Since then, there has been extensive discussion about why it happened and how to prevent a recurrence. The root causes are not difficult to identify. ⸻ What actually happened 1.Binance launched a temporary user-acquisition campaign offering 12% APY on USDe, while allowing USDe to be used as collateral with the same treatment as USDT and USDC, and without effective limits. 2.USDe is a tokenized hedge fund product. Ethena raises capital via a so-called “stablecoin,” deploys it into index arbitrage and algorithmic trading strategies, and tokenizes the resulting fund. The token can then be deposited on exchanges to earn yield. 3.USDe is fundamentally different from products such as BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton BENJI, which are tokenized money market funds with low-risk profiles. USDe, by contrast, embeds hedge-fund-level risk. This difference is structural, not cosmetic. 4.Binance users were encouraged to convert USDT and USDC into USDe to earn attractive yields, without sufficient emphasis on the underlying risks. From a user’s perspective, trading with USDe appeared no different from trading with traditional stablecoins—while the actual risk profile was materially higher. 5.Risk escalated further as users: •converted USDT/USDC into USDe, •used USDe as collateral to borrow USDT, •converted the borrowed USDT back into USDe, •and repeated the cycle. This leverage loop produced artificial APYs of 24%, 36%, and even 70%+, widely perceived as “low risk” simply because they were offered by a major platform. Systemic risk accumulated rapidly across the global crypto market. 6.At that point, even a small market shock was sufficient to trigger a collapse. When volatility hit, USDe depegged quickly. Cascading liquidations followed, and weaknesses in risk management around assets such as WETH and BNSOL further amplified the crash. Some tokens briefly traded near zero. The damage to global users and companies—including OKX customers—was severe, and recovery will take time. ⸻ Why this matters I am discussing the root cause, not assigning blame or launching an attack on Binance. Speaking openly about systemic risks is sometimes uncomfortable, but it is necessary if the industry is to mature responsibly. I expect there may be significant misinformation and coordinated FUD directed at OKX in the near future. Even so, speaking honestly about systemic risk is the right thing to do—and we will continue to do so. As the largest global platform, Binance has outsized influence—and corresponding responsibility—as an industry leader. Long-term trust in crypto cannot be built on short-term yield games, excessive leverage, or marketing practices that obscure risk. The industry needs leaders who prioritize market stability, transparency, and responsible innovation—not a winner-take-all mentality where criticism is treated as hostility. Crypto is still early. What we choose to normalize today will determine whether this industry earns lasting trust—or repeats the same mistakes again.
6
541
$800
Replying to @x256xx
You’re basically buying a token x10 times fundamentally stronger than when it was at ATHs ~60$ And you have the opportunity to buy it at 20$ now, If you don’t get it, just stop investing all together and do something else with your time and money. Hyperliquid
1
158
How airdrop farming in 2026 feels like:

ALT Court Jester Dancing GIF

1
135
Another >100.000 HYPE tokens permanently removed from 1B fixed supply today. Hyperliquid
1
1
122
Point proven lol Stay away from blatant scams like @MANTRA_Chain that are a clear net negative for the industry. Stop being so naive and believe poorly credible excuses.
the tl;dr is the provided image below pretty much Basically rugged everyone, didn’t take responsibility for it and blamed it on market makers lmfao There were signs like very poor communication and constantly delaying the airdrop because prices were already scam pumped, of course in the meantime that the airdrop was still ‘vested’ it went to zero 🤣
2
309
Ruzzi11 retweeted
This chart says it all. Lighter was nothing more than an opportunistic farm, designed for short-term extraction, dumping $LIT, and moving on to the next opportunity. I said it at TGE: anyone buying this at a $3B FDV was making a retarded mistake. And it’s been effectively down-only ever since - not just in price, but across all meaningful metrics: new users, TVL, fees, activity. Like it or not, once you’re chasing projects whose only strategy is “take market share from the first-mover”, you’ve already lost. We’ve seen this pattern over and over: L1s (ETH/SOL), launchpads (PUMP), DeFi protocols (AAVE, UNI) etc, the list goes on. The same applies to perp DEXs. there is no second hyperliquid i love you
88
11
245
28,426
Wait a sec, have we really started debating whether token buybacks are good or not? And am I really seeing people even implying buybacks are bad? If what I’m seeing is in fact real then I can say there are different levels of stupidity but this one takes the cake. Turn those buybacks off and amplify the max extraction blatantly hidden as ‘growth’, that for sure will do good for your token! - CT, 2026.
1
2
169
Welp, HyperEVM gas burnt (about 3000 transactions) Check yours at hyperliquid-wrapped.otomato.… @otomato_xyz
1
1
306
Institutions discovering and buying BTC has the same feel as when boomers discovered Facebook and everyone <30 years of age stopped using it and switched to Instagram. Wait a sec-
3
483
Physical addiction to Digital addiction? One Piece TCG unlocked thanks to @phygitals 🙌
5
710