The ottoman empire would like to have a word
Islam is a messianic political ideology whose core texts and historical practice conflict with the foundational commitments of Western civilization: individual rights, secular law, free speech, and the equality of persons before the law.
The Quran and the accompanying hadith corpus contain extensive material that, in the dominant traditional readings still taught in many mosques and madrasas, prescribes violence against unbelievers, death for apostasy, subordination of women, and legal discrimination against non-Muslims.
These are not fringe verses; they form part of the classical legal tradition that continues to shape attitudes in large parts of the Muslim world.
Populations from the main source countries of Islamic immigration consistently underperform on measures of cognitive ability, educational attainment, and social trust. Combined with high rates of consanguinity and cultural norms that prize honor and in-group loyalty over abstract principles, this produces communities that integrate poorly and generate disproportionate social costs.
The institutional vehicles for transmitting this ideology— mosques, Islamic centers, and networks funded from the Gulf or Turkey—have been imported into Western countries at scale. Not every Muslim is a jihadist or an Islamist. The relevant fact is that the ideological infrastructure, the unaltered sacred texts, and the demographic patterns persist. That combination functions as a long-term fifth column: a population whose primary loyalty, in the event of conflict between Islamic doctrine and host-country law, is not guaranteed to the latter.
The empirical record in Europe already shows the costs—parallel legal systems, elevated crime in specific categories, political pressure for blasphemy restrictions, and periodic terrorism—far exceed any economic or cultural benefits claimed for mass Islamic immigration.