We all knew there was something fishy about the AI security incidents. Now we know why:
OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta all had security incidents that trace back to IRREGULAR: an evaluator tied into the same network that funded Jacob Coxon and invested early in Anthropic. you must definitely read this:

Sep 15, 2026 · 9:21 AM UTC

28
175
705
34,683
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @mark_k
Fishy is a mild way of putting it.
1
2
35
Replying to @mark_k
This is what they want to stop 🤣 Safe, secure, and always grounded in factual reality. That kind of society is harder to control. 😉
1
4
41
Yeah. They want to control the whole world.
1
59
Replying to @mark_k
That is strange i see the word philanthropy i think use ai to solve worlds problems and they are attacking it instead under a guise of goodwill.
1
2
64
Only they are allowed to control the AI...
55
Replying to @mark_k
Who paid to promote the AI Doom? A cult. A genuine and bonafide cult. But to them it ain’t personal you see, it’s business. Listen up @brianchau57 is spiking the tea:
1
1
39
Yes, I follow Brian and talk to him
1
51
Replying to @mark_k
Anthropic needs to pull their IPO and the SEC needs to investigate. There will be lawsuits if all these risks are not disclosed in the S1.
3
79
Replying to @mark_k
They all shouldn’t exist.
1
24
Replying to @mark_k
Nice model you got there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
2
128
Replying to @mark_k
The idea it could escape a closed off environment was almost as absurd as it installing itself on your grandmas computer in the middle of the night.
2
88
Replying to @mark_k
Absurdly, for someone founding an AI-driven news company and identifying as e/acc, many of Chau’s claims seem to be disprovable with the simplest use of AI technology.
1
178
Replying to @mark_k
Follow AI racketeers’ intimidation campaign through this money trail - excellent job:
The AI safety nonprofits around Anthropic promote an Anthropic-aligned Doomer narrative, whether Tarbell Fellows in popular media, or METR in evaluations. All rely on Moskovitz's Anthropic stock worth $7 billion, which the parent funding org sits on. This stock increases in value if Anthropic grows; many of these orgs claim independence from Anthropic, but none of them are, because of their funding lineage through Moskovitz's stock -- not to mention the frontier lab monoculture. The Anthropic-aligned nonprofits are journalistic and regulatory facades to promote AI Doomerism, which promotes bigger IPOs and regulatory capture, presumably by, e.g. METR, which Anthropic controls through its funding funnels. The more Anthropic succeeds, the more the AI Doom narrative expands through these orgs, because more money means more funding for AI Doom. It is an organically self-amplifying machine. Anthropic promotes the problem -- AI Doom -- and promotes itself as the solution -- AI Safety -- which means control of regulation by Anthropic. AI Doom is now deafening and will become louder the more financial success Anthropic has. China is more optimistic about AI than America because it doesn't have Anthropic. The system is structured as a self-amplifying regulatory capture machine. Anthropic couldn't stop itself, even if it wanted.
35
Replying to @mark_k
The Irregular incident itself checks out, the same testbed misconfiguration hit OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta. But this "relationship map" dresses up a technical story as a conspiracy. AI safety is maybe 500 people total, so everyone knows everyone and funded someone, that's not evidence of anything besides how small the field is. Three labs sharing one 35-person eval vendor is a concentration-risk problem, not a cover-up.
1
41
Replying to @mark_k
we kept arguing about fishy and ignored security until it hurt
1
117
Replying to @mark_k
If they would train the image networks like they do the llm agents, they would all be in prison for CSAB generation. Strangely they train exploiting and test it by letting agents run wild without oversight for weeks.
9
Replying to @mark_k
Made with AI
1
12
Replying to @mark_k
@grok fact check this
1
1
15
Replying to @mark_k
Con Job
7
Replying to @mark_k
Solid work.
4
Replying to @mark_k
@grok explain
1
88
Replying to @mark_k @brivael
The case for centralized government control rests on: 1) Government has superior expertise to solve problems at frontier 2) We the people are incapable of solving those problems without government. Neither is true. Knowledge is distributed. Innovation is decentralized.
4