fortuna amissa impotens mentula magna

Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Civility is the spanx holding in the barbarism of humanity.
10
21
113
I’ve some letters to write and I have found an opening line that I am going to steal from Dr Samuel Johnson.
4
84
So I took that 12 Axes political philosophy test. I’ve taken it three times in fact. After the 240 question one I got the result posted below. WFB jr, Edmund Burke, and Irving Kristol are all spot on. 1/3
1
50
When I took the shorter forms of the test I got another completely acceptable result. Reagan Conservative. 2/3
1
1
7
Sorry. That looks like a dedicated craftsman spent thousands of man hours creating an absolute masterpiece.
43
Not a single one of you heathens noted that the wine bottle wearing the Dracula cape is Egri Bikiver or “Bulls Blood” from Hungary. What could be more seasonal? Nothing!
4
15
340
When you look at this one from a distance it may seem like Jason’s… Erm… Well… @mowoodier @EnochStevens0n
ギュスターヴ・モロー『イアソン』1865年 オルセー美術館
4
1
5
179
This is more of the hair color I think of. @EnochStevens0n.
4
145
Good morning @EnochStevens0n. Though she is sometimes depicted with red hair, I rarely think of Aphrodite with red hair.
Herbert James Draper — The Pearls of Aphrodite, 1907
1
4
212
The Maximum Leader retweeted
Scherzer and Verlander retiring the same week is the baseball version of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson dying on July 4th for guys my age.
43
764
13,716
249,201
The Maximum Leader retweeted
Fun fact: ship navigators don’t use detailed charts in the middle of the ocean. We only bring out accurate charts when we get close to land. You will usually have a big chart showing the entire ocean, but it’s mostly useless for anything except a quick sense of how far you’ve gone and how far you still have to go. BUT we still try to pinpoint our position. Why, if we’re certain we aren’t going to run aground? Because we want to know how far wind and current are pushing us off course. More importantly, if we lose GPS and can’t take celestial sights because it’s cloudy, we want our “last known position” to be as recent as possible. Today, digital charts can plot the ship’s position continuously. But what did we do before that? Well since there is nothing to run into in the middle of the ocean we used blank charts called “plotting sheets.” A plotting sheet (image below) is basically a blank paper a latitude scale, compass rose, and graticule framework; the navigator defines the longitude. They aren’t required (you can draw your own latitude and longitude marks on blank paper with dividers and triangles) but they simplify the job. You take your position from GPS, celestial navigation, dead reckoning or whatever navigation system you have available and physically plot it accurately with a pencil. You need accuracy because celestial navigation requires taking multiple sights and finding where they cross. A perfect set of sextant sights is called a “pinwheel” because they all intersect at the same point. True pinwheels are rare. You don’t need that accuracy with GPS (a logbook of time, lat and long is sufficient) but you do need it if you want to cross check GPS with celestial sights. Then you draw your course line and mark your positions along it. Out in the middle of the ocean, we might only plot a fix every hour because there’s nothing nearby to hit. Before GPS it could take days for the clouds to lift for you to start getting fixes and you would advance the all to a single noon position the radio operator would transmit back to the company. Today the company can see your exact position at all times via satellite AIS. But those little pencil marks matter. They show whether the ship is making the course and speed we expected. They show the effect of current and wind. And if every electronic navigation system suddenly goes dark, that last pencil dot becomes extremely valuable. From there, you can start dead reckoning forward: Last known position. Course. Speed. Time. Estimated current. And now you have a reasonably good idea where the ship should be. Not perfect but it can all be done on a blank sheet of paper. P.S. Celestial is something every officer learns but infrequently do. That’s slowly starting to change with increased GPS jamming and spoofing,
What do ship officers actually do on the bridge in the middle of the ocean? Is it boring? Coming into port and getting underway are the busy parts. You’ve got pilots, tugs, traffic, currents, shallow water, anchors, lines, engines changing speed, radios going constantly and a lot of people moving around the bridge. Officers are plotting positions evey six minutes, changing courses, talking to vessel traffic control, checking the pilot, monitoring the helmsman follows the pilot commands. Once you clear the coast and get into deep water, things change dramatically. Most large ships are on autopilot. It’s not a smart autopilot. Before sailing, we build a passage plan that may contain dozens of waypoints. Once we’re offshore, a modern ship can steer between those waypoints but usually we put it in hand steering for course changes and leave the autopilot to do the straight lines. The autopilot basically does one job: hold the heading or track we tell it to hold. It doesn’t know that the fishing boat six miles ahead is doing something stupid. It can’t hear the VHF radio. It doesn’t know there’s a squall line developing. It doesn’t know the captain’s standing orders. It doesn’t know the company called to change our routing. That’s why there is always a licensed officer on the bridge. Usually there’s also a lookout, depending on the ship, company and conditions but if it’s a clear day in the middle of nowhere the officer might be the only person on the bridge. The job is mostly monitoring. Radar. AIS. ECDIS. Compass. GPS. Depth. Weather. Engine status. Radio traffic. Other ships. And most importantly, looking out the windows. Every few minutes you’re mentally updating the same picture: Where are we? Where is everyone else? What are they doing? What has changed? What could go wrong? In heavy traffic this can be extremely busy. In the middle of the Pacific at 0300, with the nearest ship 40 miles away, it can be extremely quiet. And yes, boring. You might spend four hours staring at a black horizon with absolutely nothing happening. But the problem with standing bridge watch is that you never know when four hours of nothing is going to become 90 seconds of chaos. A ship appears. A radar target changes course. A fishing boat without AIS pops up. Visibility suddenly disappears. An alarm sounds. The engine room calls. That’s why you can’t completely switch off. Phones are generally restricted on watch. Headphones are banned too because watchstanders are required to watch AND listen. You need to hear the radios, alarms, fog signals and what’s happening around you. Some captains allow quiet music on the bridge offshore. Others don’t. Some sitting but not for too long. Mostly pacing. The biggest change 30 years is paperwork. In the 90s you would be chastised for doing anything but watching, now mates do a lot of mindless paperwork and computer training to comply with UN @IMOHQ regulations. Today most ships have computers, tablets and electronic charts on the bridge. Conversation fills a lot of time. Sometimes you get great conversations with crew on breaks or the lookout,. Sometimes you hear the same conversation every sailor has been having for 200 years: The company is terrible. The last captain was crazy. The next port is terrible. The previous ship was better. Lots of rumors and conspiracy theories. Someone has discovered an investment opportunity that is absolutely guaranteed to make everyone rich. Then there are the nights I personally like best. Middle of the ocean. No moon. Almost no traffic. Phosphorescence everywhere. Bridge lights red and turned all the way down. And millions of stars overhead that most people on land will never see. You stand there doing fifteen knots through absolute darkness, thousands of miles from home, responsible for the ship and everyone sleeping below you. Only you and the lookout are awake, Most of the time, nothing happens at all.
17
25
250
16,514
Hey @SvenTystnad. Are you still out there in the ether with us?
2
48
More nymphs @EnochStevens0n
"Nymph Discovering a Mermaid in the Reeds" by Georges-Marie-Julien Girardot (1856–1914). I like nymphs, fairies, rusalki and all those strange creatures that are supposed to live deep in forests, lakes and marshes. They seem to have been much more common in art than they are today... perhaps they’re still hiding, and wisely so. Here a nymph has just discovered a mermaid in the reeds, which feels like exactly the sort of thing that could happen if you wander far enough from civilization.
1
1
7
217
Okay. David Niven was toppled by Peter Sellers. We continue. Pick one.
31% Peter Sellers
69% Errol Flynn
16 votes • Final results
1
1
113
<Me holding up sexy red bra in laundry room.> Self: What the hell?!?! I've never seen you wear this bra. Wife: That's not my bra. That's your soon-to-be daughter-in-law's bra. Self <dropping bra like it is made of molten steel>: JESUS, MARY, AND JOSEPH!!! </scene>
6
28
409
The Maximum Leader retweeted
David Attenborough voiceover: “With the arrival of the rainy season, the herd sets out on its yearly migration in search of drier climates further inland to wait out the coming winter”
Vintage.NewJersey
25
49
398
6,116
The woman in line in front of me at Wegmans has a lovely face that looks like it came right out of a Holbein painting.
1
1
11
143
Good morning @EnochStevens0n. More reading without clothing.
Reclining Nude (c. 1925) by René François Xavier Prinet
1
2
262