This is the problem when the DOJ decides to get creative with a legal theory on something like 18 USC 1960 - the DOJ shoots an arrow and then paints the target around it, trying to fill in shoddy evidence after the fact.
The real tragedy is that the accused is always starting from behind - the gov has a head start, massive resources, and built-in credibility with the jury. It is very hard for the defense to address every issue in real time while sitting in the defendant's chair and bring the jury along.
Take this issue, raised by
@tayvano_ @zachxbt and others - the DOJ puts up a victim witness that has no verifiable on-chain connection to TC and therefore, is irrelevant to the
@rstormsf trial. When Storm's team raises it, the DOJ simply re-notices an expert (that was not previously disclosed as a tracing expert because they have a separate tracing expert who did not talk about this) at midnight Tues am to say this agent will now testify TC was "a few hops" from the victim's addresses. But the evidence doesn't support that. So now Storm's team has to file this motion (linked below) at midnight last night to preclude this new expert from further tainting this jury on this shoddy tracing. Even if the judge agrees with the defense and precludes the testimony, which usually doesn't happen, the jury heard the victim's testimony and can never un-hear it, even if it is stricken from the record. Now Storm's team has to work even harder to correct this misimpression or gamble on a motion for a mistrial.
This first witness in Roman's trial immediately caught my attention bc the victim was a classic Pig Butchering case.
The only issue is....uh.....those scammers don't use Tornado Cash? And they never have?
So, like, wtf?