🚨 $2,461 Payout Rejected — Aqua Funded Cites Copy Trading
• Another payout dispute involving Aqua Funded is raising questions about how copy-trading allegations are handled.
• According to trader
@Mustufa7860S , he requested a $2,461 payout on
September 28, but the payout was rejected on October 1.
• The reason given by the firm was reportedly copy trading:
• The firm claims 6 trades were copied to other accounts.
• It also claims those accounts were logged in from the trader’s device.
• The trader strongly denies any involvement in copy trading or coordinated trading.
• He says he has never traded in coordination with those accounts.
• If Aqua Funded has clear evidence linking these trades to the trader, why not provide the specific trade IDs, timestamps, and technical evidence supporting the allegation?
• A payout rejection based on a serious rule violation should be backed by clear, verifiable evidence — not just a general allegation.
- Aqua Funded, transparency matters. What exactly is the evidence behind this $2,461 rejection?
@AquaFunded @LewisAquaFunded