Hello, @ajtradinglucid @TradingLucid I did see me affiliate got removed and same with me 1k unpaid comissions. I asked live chat #139167912. They said I breached affiliate terms. I asked what exactly, and it’s been 20 days with no reply. It will be nice if I received a update.

This is my last post about the FundingPips CID situation. I’ve tried everything I could, stayed respectful, and kept hoping for a fair resolution, but I’m done fighting it. I genuinely believed this could be resolved, but I accept the decision and I’m moving on. @fundingpips

I requested a payout of 2461$ on 28 sept and my payout was rejected 1 Oct they are saying that I am involved in copy trading and there are 6 trades are copied on another accounts and that accounts are login in my device.Which is not they are making fake reason to reject my payout

First ever prop firm payout after 2 years trading, update: Denied GFT flagged a margin rule violation on a single trade because of a tight stop loss, even though my actual dollar risk was locked at my standard 1.7%. They adjusted the profits from that trade and reset my trading days to 0 Personally, I think Prop firms should really evaluate risk based on % account risk per trade rather than raw margin utilization because tight SLs naturally push up lot sizes while keeping dollar risk safe. Annoying setback, but the account is still active.

🔴 Avoid @thepipfarm I purchased a $59 account, and I was supposed to receive a $49 refund. It has now been over a month, and I still haven’t received my refund. I made the mistake of choosing an account just because it was cheap. Don’t make the same mistake I did. Totally fraud. 🚨

On September 2, 2026, FundingPips terminated my account — right as I was about to receive my funded/live account after passing both evaluation phases through genuine, independent trading. Their reason: my "Device ID" (CID) allegedly matched another registered user's, which they said "may indicate" shared access, coordinated trading, or third-party involvement. No specific evidence, no timestamps, no explanation of how this was actually determined — just a general claim, and immediate permanent termination. I responded the same day. I explained I use my own separate, genuine device, and offered full cooperation: device details, IMEI information, and a live video verification call where I could show my physical device and log into my account in real time for their team to verify directly. I had nothing to hide, and I wanted this resolved properly. FundingPips declined every offer. They said live verification "would not change the findings already established," and refused to disclose any specific evidence beyond the general Device ID claim, citing confidential "detection methodology." I exchanged multiple emails over the following days, laying out my case respectfully each time — their replies got shorter and shorter until, on September 8, I received a final message: "our decision is final and cannot be reversed." No further explanation was ever given. I'm not asking for anything unfair here. I passed both phases legitimately, and I remain fully willing to do a live interview, live video verification, or provide any other reasonable proof to confirm my devices and trading were entirely independent. All I'm asking for is a genuine, evidence-based review — not a report I have no way to verify, followed by silence. @fundingpips @fundingpipsmod @Khldfx @avikkfp please kindly look into this matter. Need your support. #PropFirm #trader #XAUUSD #FundingPips #TradingCommunity #forex

My payout with @AquaFunded got rejected because I open position using 0.2 lots in different occasions on a 10k account and the consider it HFT, therefore I am calling on @LewisAquaFunded @shepherd_fx @faridaharuna to come to my rescue, this is my first ever proforms payout and it's means alot to me.

🚨Hey @seanbaint kindly reply to this publicly, @GuardianFutures forfeited my 26k$ with baseless allegation🚨 🧵 @EricGairns @TrustedPropNews @PropFirmMatch @theproptruth @PropFirmsGuru @PFRT_X @risers343 @raunitfx @SahibNoor08 @propfirmnation1 @ninetrades9

🚨 WARNING REGARDING @AquaFunded Aqua Funded has removed all of my profits and rejected my payout request, claiming that I violated their high-margin trading rules. I strongly disagree with this decision. I did not intentionally violate any such rule, and I share my trades transparently throughout my trading journey. This is a very serious and disappointing situation, and based on my experience, I cannot say that I consider this process fair. I will request that Aqua Funded review my case again and provide a clear explanation of the alleged violation. I’ll keep you updated on the outcome. #propfirm #propfirmtrading #ScammerAlert

Payout rejected. Honestly, this is one of the most useless prop firms I’ve dealt with. Very disappointing. @atlasfunded

🚨 I NEED THE TRADING COMMUNITY’S HELP. $42,409.74 IN PAYOUTS WERE APPROVED BY ALPHA FUTURES. THEN EVERYTHING CHANGED. I had 3 Advanced Qualified accounts with Alpha Futures and had already been successfully paid by them before. At the time I was going through one of the hardest financial periods of my life, drowning in debt and trying to keep everything together. Trading was the one thing I refused to give up on. I spent countless hours studying, losing, learning and improving until I finally became consistently profitable. When another $42,409.74 was APPROVED across my accounts, I genuinely thought I had finally made it out. I thought all the stress, sleepless nights and time I put into becoming profitable had finally paid off. For the first time in a long time, I felt like I could breathe again. Then everything flipped upside down. After those approvals, Alpha Risk went back through MONTHS of my old evaluations and found a large amount of 1-second MNQ trades. I AM NOT DENYING THOSE TRADES. After completing my main NQ trade for the day, I would sometimes rapidly enter and exit 1 MNQ to intentionally take small losses and lower my daily profit for the consistency requirement. Alpha considers that prohibited order spamming. I’ve admitted that activity and I’m not going to hide the part of this situation that I was responsible for. But Alpha made another allegation that I completely deny. They claim 517 OF MY TRADES matched ONE specific other trader. I genuinely have NO IDEA who this person is. I’m a solo trader. I’ve never coordinated trades with this person, shared signals with them or knowingly group traded with anybody. I asked Alpha to provide the underlying 517 alleged matching trades with the other trader’s identity completely redacted so I could actually see what they’re referring to. Their Risk Manager told me an internal request had been made for that data. I STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED IT. What makes this so difficult for me to understand is that the MNQ activity Alpha cited went back MONTHS. During that time I continued purchasing and passing evaluations, received Qualified accounts, successfully received previous performance fees and eventually had another $42,409.74 APPROVED before the historical review resulted in my permanent ban and those approved performance fees not being paid. This has honestly been one of the darkest periods of my life. I went from thinking I had finally traded my way out of an incredibly difficult financial situation to watching everything I worked for disappear almost overnight. I’m not asking the internet to blindly believe me. I’M ASKING PEOPLE TO LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. I have the emails. I have the performance fee approvals. I have Alpha’s Risk findings. I have my responses. I have the message confirming that the 517-trade data was internally requested. I WILL SHOW MY SIDE AND ALPHA’S SIDE. If I did something, I’ll admit it. I’ve already done exactly that with the MNQ trades. But if Alpha says 517 of my trades matched one specific trader, I believe it’s reasonable to ask to see those trades with that person’s identity protected. All I want is transparency and one genuine reconsideration of my case. I’m asking every Alpha Futures affiliate, futures trader, trading creator and prop-firm media page who sees this to PLEASE help get this in front of somebody who can actually look at everything. A repost costs nothing, but right now it could mean everything to me. @Alpha_Futures_ @RIPS @Wordsofrizdom @bigchartrades @DeroTrades @Market_Reapers @RamosTwiit @TweakinTrades @andrewtradez @keyflowtrades @aw_trades_ @therealtrader__ @biantrades @KrixxBanks @PropFirmsGuru @TrustedPropNews @propfirmsupdate @PropFirmMedia @propfirmeye @saveonpropfirms PLEASE TAG ANY ALPHA FUTURES AFFILIATE, CREATOR OR TRADING PAGE I MISSED. PLEASE REPOST. #AlphaFutures #FuturesTrading #PropFirms #PropTrading #FundedTrader #NQ #DayTrading #TradingCommunity

🚨🚨“I Was Up $5.3K, Passed a Second Compliance Session, and @FundedNext Is Offering Me a New Challenge Instead of My Original $50K Funded Account.”🚨 Finally, FundedNext offered me another live Compliance Session. I accepted the opportunity and successfully passed the second compliance session. FundedNext confirmed that my session was completed successfully. I thought this would finally resolve the issue and get my original account reinstated. However, despite passing the session, my original $50K funded account which was up 5.3k remained inactive. After repeated follow-ups, I was told my case was still under review. Now, instead of reinstating my original funded account, FundedNext is offering me a new challenge account. Seriously, why should I start from zero again when I had already worked so hard to earn my funded account and reached $5.3K+ in profit? After everything I've been through, how can I trust a new account? What happens if I pass another challenge, reach another payout, and face the same situation again? strongly reject the offer of a new challenge account. I don't want to buy or start another challenge. I want a fair resolution for the account I already earned. My request is simple: 1 Reinstate my original $50K funded account with same balance. 2 If reinstatement is genuinely impossible, fairly settle my remaining profits from the original account. I am not asking for charity or a free challenge. I am asking for fairness, transparency, and respect for the months of hard work I invested. This account means everything to me. After 3.5 years of struggle in trading, I finally achieved this milestone. It is heartbreaking💔 that my account was terminated and remains inactive even after I successfully passed the compliance session. @Flynnn_FN @PropFirmsGuru @propfirmeye @propfirmsupdate @propfundsquad @PropFirmSight @PropFirmMedia @TrustedPropHub @theproptruth @propwatchmedia @propfundsquad #futuretrading #propfirm #payoutrejection

🚨⚠️ WORST EXPERIENCE WITH @FundingPips — FALSE ALLEGATION & INCONSISTENCIES IN THEIR CORRESPONDENCE I never expected this from a prop firm with such a strong reputation. My FundingPips account #20290494 was permanently terminated for allegedly engaging in reverse trading with another user. I DID NOT DO ANY REVERSE TRADING. I don't know the other trader, I have no connection with that account, and I trade completely independently using my own setups and risk management. What makes this situation even more concerning is the inconsistency in FundingPips' own correspondence. I have attached screenshots of all the emails (Please view attachment on the post on this post thread) so everyone can see the communication for themselves. Here is the timeline: 1️⃣ First allegation — “Reverse Trading” FundingPips initially told me that I had engaged in reverse trading and permanently suspended my account. They provided one trade as evidence. 2️⃣ I denied the allegation I clearly explained that I had NOT done reverse trading and that the other account shown in their evidence was not mine and that I had no connection with that trader. 3️⃣ The trade itself does not match According to the evidence provided by FundingPips: My XAUUSD trade opened at 15:21:24. The other account's trade opened at 15:33:54. That's a 12 minutes 30 seconds difference. Opening prices: My trade: 4395.29 Other account: 4408.04 That's a 12.75 USD and 130 pips difference in opening price. Yet FundingPips considers this sufficient to conclude that I was reverse trading with another user. 4️⃣ The allegation then changed After I explained that I had no connection with the other account, FundingPips referred to the activity as: ➡️ Reverse trading with another user Then, in their latest response, they referred to: ➡️ Copy trading / coordinated trading These are serious allegations, and the change in terminology raises serious questions about how my case was actually reviewed. 5️⃣ I repeatedly requested a manual review I asked FundingPips to establish what actual connection exists between me and the other account. I offered to explain my trading strategy. I even offered to participate in an interview with their Risk & Compliance team but they refused. Instead, I was told (Same automated replies): -No further escalation -No interview -No formal appeal -Decision is final 6️⃣ The biggest issue There are thousands of traders trading the same instruments every day. Two independent traders can take opposite positions in XAUUSD. If one trading pattern is enough to permanently terminate an account without establishing an actual connection between the traders, then every trader using a prop firm should be concerned about this type of compliance process. I am not asking @FundingPips to ignore its rules. I am asking for actual evidence that I coordinated with, copied, or reverse traded another user. Because I DID NOT. I purchased this account because I trusted FundingPips reputation and intended to trade with the firm long term. Instead, I have been permanently accused of something I did not do, and my requests for a proper senior-level review have been refused. 📌 Email screenshots are attached on the post and on this thread. I am sharing the complete correspondence so traders can read the responses themselves and make their own judgment. @FundingPips — if you have conclusive evidence that I intentionally coordinated with another trader, show the evidence connecting me to that account. If you don't, then this account should not have been permanently terminated based on an assumption. This is by far one of the worst experiences I have had with a prop firm. #FundingPips #PropFirm #ForexTrading #XAUUSD

@_PrzFunded scammed me, after requesting payout, they blocked me & created a new fake discord account today with my name and the fake acc claimed he received payout with fake ai generated screenshot, they launched 2 weeks ago and now they are claiming they paid $2M

@XM_COM I need answers regarding rejecting my withdrawal and denial of my profits and closure of my trading accounts. @XM_COM alleges that I engaged in “opposite” or coordinated trading, but has provided no specific evidence showing how I supposedly did this. I have traded major news events before and lose money with them. Now that I have made a profit of $9k from a balance of $1k, my profits are suddenly tdenied and account being closed . If I violated your Terms, show me the specific evidence and exact clause I violated. I am asking for transparency and the return of my legitimate profit and any funds you cannot establish as invalid. @XM_COM, please address this publicly and explain your decision. Was I the only one trading the news, or am I simply one of the victims? Your own website clearly states: “Yes, we do allow trading around major news.” which is what i simply do, anticipate the news spike and trade it. Never did i coordinated sn opposite trades. Please FXNG come in 🙏 @forexblog9ja @theFB9ja @Chartswithmax @reeyah_sa @tradewithola @jahbreezFX @PropFirmsGuru @forexbloggerayo @SpeedouForex @Micheal44A2 @OnlyLuso @Talk2Temikola @CableAnlyst @Kelvintalent_ @Energycrypt @Tenchriztm @AU79executioner @Fairy_Trades

Honestly, I’m deeply disappointed in @GoatFunded how this situation turned out. After putting in the time, effort, discipline, and following the rules, having my payout denied is extremely frustrating. I respect that every company has its rules and policies, but when someone

I’m seeking clarification from @FundedNext regarding my terminated account. Live Support told me that when reviewing my trading, my overall trading history was not considered grid trading. However, the Trading Ethics & Standards Team concluded that my trading constituted grid trading. What I’m asking for is simple: if the conclusion is based on my overall trading history, why was the evidence presented to me limited to only 10 trades out of 16 trades recorded in my MT5 history? I have repeatedly requested the factual evidence and methodology showing how the complete trading history establishes a grid-trading violation. Instead, I have only been told that the case was reviewed and the decision is final. I have also been told that the assessment is based on the opening-time sequence, but I have not been provided with a complete trade-by-trade analysis demonstrating how all 16 trades satisfy the alleged grid-trading criteria. I’m not asking anyone to take my side. I’m asking for the evidence and factual basis supporting the conclusion.

I mean can anyone be this disrespectful towards their selves @QtFunded made me wait half an year just to give me update about my 1000$ payout made me give interviews told me my account will be resetted then I breached the rules and when I asked for proof they have nothing