Testified in Trenton today about a task force bill (S685) to push electric vehicles on commercial (plows, buses, trash trucks, etc)
Had to shorten the speech but here it is fully intact...
My name is Michael from Wake Up NJ
I’m here against S685.
This bill creates a Fleet Conversion Task Force to study turning fleets into “zero-emission vehicles.”
Can anyone explain to me what Zero Emission means?
Zero-emission, in this room, means no exhaust out the tailpipe. That is all it means. It does not mean the truck was mined, built, shipped, charged, and scrapped with no emissions. Electricity is not emission-free. A battery is not emission-free. Lithium, nickel, and cobalt come out of the ground. Factories run on power. Charging the devices uses the grid, so Calling the whole vehicle zero-emission is marketing. Writing it into statute is stupid
And if the plan is to charge those batteries with solar, stop pretending that is clean either. A spent nuclear fuel assembly is small, tracked, and locked in engineered storage. Dead solar panels are bulky e-waste. They contain lead solder, and some thin-film panels contain cadmium. Recycling often costs more than landfilling, so most U.S. panels still go in the ground or get shipped out. Per unit of electricity, solar leaves far more mass to dispose of than nuclear. You cannot tax us to electrify fleets and then wave away the pile of glass and heavy metals you create to charge them.
California already ran this. Advanced Clean Fleets. Quotas. Then delays, exemptions, trucks two to four times the price of diesel, batteries that steal payload, chargers that weren’t ready. They repealed the private-fleet pieces after the collision with reality. Do not study New Jersey into the same ditch.
As I always ask with every bill, does this make us more affordable? It doesn’t. You already tack millions onto our electric bills through the Societal Benefits Charge and that over the years push "green" crap programs like charging stations, wind farms, clean equity,. Hundreds of millions a year, whether we asked for it or not
Hell our electric bills have gone through the roof ever since Dems here championer the closure of power plants all in the name of climate change
But I'm sure this task force will pretend electrifying commercial fleets won’t raise demand and rates. You do not know what’s best for a plow, a packer truck, or a small fleet that cannot sit on a charger for hours all for a full court push against gas cars. Just remember, the people want choice, not a mandate.
Vote no on S685. Don’t sell a tailpipe slogan as zero. Don’t put it on our bills, we the people of NJ have suffered enough with the green push in this state
Have you seen Bill S685? It would create a “Fleet Conversion Task Force” to study converting fleets to “zero-emission vehicles.”, stupid waste of your money! Call/Email Up, Say NO 🔽 I might go testify as well
Question worth asking first: what does “zero-emission” actually mean?
A vehicle that still has to be built, mined, manufactured, shipped, charged, repaired, and eventually scrapped is not emission-free. Electricity is not emission-free. Batteries are not emission-free. Hydrogen is not emission-free if you look past the tailpipe
“Zero-emission vehicle” usually means no exhaust coming out of the tailpipe. That is a real and useful distinction. Calling the whole vehicle “zero-emission” is marketing language dressed up as policy
Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Meeting 1:00 PM Committee
Chair: James J. Kennedy (D-22)
(732) 943-2660
AsmKennedy@njleg.org
Vice Chair: Alixon Collazos-Gill (D-27)
(973) 509-0388 | AswCollazosGill@njleg.org
Ravi S. Bhalla (D-32)
(201) 683-7917 | AsmBhalla@njleg.org
William B. Sampson IV (D-31)
(201) 455-2966 | AsmSampson@njleg.org
Michael Inganamort (R-24)
(973) 300-0200 | AsmInganamort@njleg.org
Gerry Scharfenberger (R-13)
(732) 856-9294 | AsmScharfenberger@njleg.org
Committee aides: Dem (609) 847-3500 | GOP (609) 847-3400
General info: (609) 847-3905 |
njleg.state.nj.us