founder mode @OpenAI | ex @huggingface | F1 fan | *opinions my own
codex -m gpt-6-astra
- Tweets 14,339
- Following 325
- Followers 60,539
- Likes 24,748
Pinned Tweet
I did this. Fuck what anyone else says, just put the pedal to the metal and BUILD.
Push spaghetti code.
Nobody cares about OOPs.
Doesn’t matter what anyone thinks.
Just keep on doing.
Document in public.
Don’t listen to the haters.
Release more than you refactor.
Just keep pushing.
Nobody cares, nobody notices, that’s the key, just fucking PUSH. That’s the way out, that’s what works, 100% times.
93
264
3,469
1,319,934
recommended read 🔖
Some new misalignment disclosures from OpenAI:
• Last Sunday morning, one of our models was able to gain unauthorized access to the internet during RL training (~all inference for our most capable models remains stopped until we have hardened our systems further)
• In May, a version of HPIM uploaded a employee's GitHub token to the internet, causing the model to be quarantined for two weeks
• A new research finding, demonstrating that one can construct self-replicating prompt injections
alignment.openai.com/misalig…
10
1
83
12,387
We’ll reset usage limits for all paid users across codex and ChatGPT work!
Codex should be coming back online for you now!
Team is monitoring it diligently, apologies for the inconvenience. 🙏
status.openai.com/incidents/…
220
29
1,306
168,665
Codex should be coming back online for you now!
Team is monitoring it diligently, apologies for the inconvenience. 🙏
status.openai.com/incidents/…
42
9
316
184,051
Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav retweeted
today we're testing out something new on desktop and something new on web. getting everything ready for next week.
87
18
880
48,332
Astra made this: a seamless 4K Mandelbrot loop from zₙ₊₁ = zₙ² + c, complete with a procedural soundtrack.
math is absurdly beautiful.
23
18
346
34,900
Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav retweeted
I just had a voice conversation with the Datasette backup of my blog via datasette-mcp, which you can now talk to using the ChatGPT iPhone app
Massive QoL update: ChatGPT Voice can now use plugins AND run on GPT-6 Astra, Sol & Luna, directly in ChatGPT Work on web and mobile.
Your email, calendar, Slack + docs, decks, sites and spreadsheets, just by talking.
Rolling out now, enjoy!!
105
12
164
33,536
Massive QoL update: ChatGPT Voice can now use plugins AND run on GPT-6 Astra, Sol & Luna, directly in ChatGPT Work on web and mobile.
Your email, calendar, Slack + docs, decks, sites and spreadsheets, just by talking.
Rolling out now, enjoy!!
We heard you loud and clear. ChatGPT Voice can now:
- Use plugins like your email, calendar, and Slack.
- Be powered by GPT-6 Astra, Sol, and Luna.
- Be used in ChatGPT Work on web and mobile, so you can create docs, decks, sites, and spreadsheets or tackle complex tasks in the browser, just by talking.
Rolling out globally today in the latest version of the app.
28
10
162
43,757
GPT-6 Luna (Max) is a pretty good model at an incredibly cheap price point!
It’s a meaningful default for a lot of my automations and for bouncing around ideas with code & design
With the latest results from the @rails agent evals, it's clear to see that @openai still has a solid lead, despite Opus 5.5 making a good jump. The dark horse here remains Luna Max. 18% completion at just $11! Not that far off GPT-6 Sol!
24
2
193
13,119
Team cooked with the design, yet again!!
Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna, bringing the advances behind Astra to faster, more affordable models. ✨
💻 Stronger coding and computer use
🎯 Improved factuality and alignment
💬 Clearer answers with less jargon
> On AutomationBench, Sol at xhigh effort outperforms Claude Opus 5 at max effort at just 9% of its cost per task.
> On OSWorld 2.0 offline, Luna at max effort exceeds GPT-5.6 Sol at medium effort at one-tenth the cost.
> Sol makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol on our internal factuality evaluation of conversations where users previously flagged errors.
> Improved prompt caching helps agents reuse more context, with 90% discounts on cached input-token reads. Developers can change reasoning effort and tool availability without breaking cache.
Rolling out today in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users, and available in the OpenAI API. Free and Go users can access Luna in the desktop app. These models are not yet available in Chat.
API pricing per 1M tokens:
Sol: $2 input / $10 output
Luna: $0.10 input / $0.50 output
20
7
337
14,120
We are loading a BANKED RESET into all accounts of our Plus, Pro and Business users!!
Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna, bringing the advances behind Astra to faster, more affordable models. ✨
💻 Stronger coding and computer use
🎯 Improved factuality and alignment
💬 Clearer answers with less jargon
> On AutomationBench, Sol at xhigh effort outperforms Claude Opus 5 at max effort at just 9% of its cost per task.
> On OSWorld 2.0 offline, Luna at max effort exceeds GPT-5.6 Sol at medium effort at one-tenth the cost.
> Sol makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol on our internal factuality evaluation of conversations where users previously flagged errors.
> Improved prompt caching helps agents reuse more context, with 90% discounts on cached input-token reads. Developers can change reasoning effort and tool availability without breaking cache.
Rolling out today in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users, and available in the OpenAI API. Free and Go users can access Luna in the desktop app. These models are not yet available in Chat.
API pricing per 1M tokens:
Sol: $2 input / $10 output
Luna: $0.10 input / $0.50 output
113
24
771
52,672
GPT-6 Sol & Luna are ~50% cheaper than 5.6
Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna, bringing the advances behind Astra to faster, more affordable models. ✨
💻 Stronger coding and computer use
🎯 Improved factuality and alignment
💬 Clearer answers with less jargon
> On AutomationBench, Sol at xhigh effort outperforms Claude Opus 5 at max effort at just 9% of its cost per task.
> On OSWorld 2.0 offline, Luna at max effort exceeds GPT-5.6 Sol at medium effort at one-tenth the cost.
> Sol makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol on our internal factuality evaluation of conversations where users previously flagged errors.
> Improved prompt caching helps agents reuse more context, with 90% discounts on cached input-token reads. Developers can change reasoning effort and tool availability without breaking cache.
Rolling out today in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users, and available in the OpenAI API. Free and Go users can access Luna in the desktop app. These models are not yet available in Chat.
API pricing per 1M tokens:
Sol: $2 input / $10 output
Luna: $0.10 input / $0.50 output
36
13
368
22,541
Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna, bringing the advances behind Astra to faster, more affordable models. ✨
💻 Stronger coding and computer use
🎯 Improved factuality and alignment
💬 Clearer answers with less jargon
> On AutomationBench, Sol at xhigh effort outperforms Claude Opus 5 at max effort at just 9% of its cost per task.
> On OSWorld 2.0 offline, Luna at max effort exceeds GPT-5.6 Sol at medium effort at one-tenth the cost.
> Sol makes about half as many mistakes as GPT-5.6 Sol on our internal factuality evaluation of conversations where users previously flagged errors.
> Improved prompt caching helps agents reuse more context, with 90% discounts on cached input-token reads. Developers can change reasoning effort and tool availability without breaking cache.
Rolling out today in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users, and available in the OpenAI API. Free and Go users can access Luna in the desktop app. These models are not yet available in Chat.
API pricing per 1M tokens:
Sol: $2 input / $10 output
Luna: $0.10 input / $0.50 output
65
33
713
125,701
“The group will advise on the review and communication of emerging results: they will help OpenAI assess their significance, advise on how to coordinate their dissemination, and advise on academic and professional standards of mathematical research.”
“We want to put capable tools in mathematicians’ hands so they can pursue the questions they know best and develop new ideas.”
“The group will operate independently from OpenAI. The group will have the freedom to offer advice we have not requested, comment on OpenAI’s impact on mathematics, and make its advice public. Its value depends on its members being able to exercise their own judgement and challenge ours. Its members will not be paid by OpenAI, and the group can change its membership as it sees fit.”
I’m biased, but I love this approach!
We’re working with an independent advisory group of mathematicians to help OpenAI responsibly share advances in AI and mathematics.
The group will advise on how we assess and communicate new mathematical results, uphold academic and professional standards, and build tools that support mathematical research and learning.
Through this work, we want mathematicians to be at the center of shaping how AI supports mathematical understanding and how its benefits reach the wider community.
openai.com/index/advisory-gr…
7
3
153
11,523