We’re working with an independent advisory group of mathematicians to help OpenAI responsibly share advances in AI and mathematics. The group will advise on how we assess and communicate new mathematical results, uphold academic and professional standards, and build tools that support mathematical research and learning. Through this work, we want mathematicians to be at the center of shaping how AI supports mathematical understanding and how its benefits reach the wider community. openai.com/index/advisory-gr…

Sep 21, 2026 · 5:50 PM UTC

983
1,143
10,709
6,593,491
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @OpenAI
Why the sudden focus on math ,Is it the easiest thing for AI or because it is purely theoretical . I just don't see the immediate applications for all of this math focus at this stage .
52
34
41,486
Replying to @OpenAI
you mean you are stealing scientist work?
7
1
22
8,083
Replying to @OpenAI
Please proceed to biology, diseases, and aging.
7
2
284
11,365
Replying to @OpenAI
The mathmeticians should accept that they dedicated their entire lives to being a human calculator and move on. Try having some other skills.
2
6
11,027
Replying to @OpenAI
Can this advisory group please fix the fact that ChatGPT still confidently tells me 9.11 is bigger than 9.9? Or is that a 'future advance'?"😅
2
2
8,164
Replying to @OpenAI
Your post says 100 open problems solved, but not out of how many tried. Reporting that % is basic good scientific practice, and would do a lot to put the abilities of the models into context. If you really care about the math community, you'll take that simple step.
11
12
146
22,527
Replying to @OpenAI @AcerFur
Just give users the power and stop solving the problems yourself… let users discover the solutions.
2
4
3,718
Replying to @OpenAI
@grok who exactly are a part of this “Independent advisory group”? Are they mathematicians? Scholars? Teachers? None of the above? Dig and pull out any esoteric findings surrounding the details of this “group”.
1
4,272
Replying to @OpenAI
I can only hope that Chinese models will catch up soon so that the committee for the gatekeeping of mathematics will be short lived.
6
19
1,050
27,111
Replying to @OpenAI
@grok list the math problem that OpenAI most likely has solved. Make a numbered list. There’re more than 100 long standing problems!
1
744
Replying to @OpenAI
Physics when?
4
14
4,457
Replying to @OpenAI
Just don't decelerate mathematical discovery.
5
959
Replying to @OpenAI
wish youd stop with that nerd bs no one cares for solve a genetic disorder cure blindness predict an earthquake no normie cares about that math bs. that's why they will burn your data centers. and probably be right too
6
7
3,320
Replying to @OpenAI
Discover cures to disease? No! Help nerds keep their academic “prestige.” They should learn to mine.
50
Replying to @OpenAI
I’m not saying we are there yet, but it is clear that AI will soon discover mathematic proofs that are so long and complicated that perhaps no single human will be able to understand them after a lifetime of study and therefore never use them. But other AI’s will.
1
2
3,210
Replying to @OpenAI
Bringing in mathematicians after the model already found 100 open problems feels like hiring inspectors once the building's built. Curious whether any of those problems get retracted once the advisory group actually digs through the proofs line by line.
390
Replying to @OpenAI
we are responsibly implanting 100s of solutions to open math and physics problems in the entrails of goats and inviting a haruspex with good augury skills
1
2
1,971
Replying to @OpenAI
Who knew that the biggest challenge in mathematics would be mathematicians?
7
16
1,214
36,352
Replying to @OpenAI
Fix this!
2
49
6,020
Replying to @OpenAI
Can this is perhaps a sibling model be put into work of explaining and making the discoveries widely understood? This would profit human race way more than any group of advisors. Explain how it is done and mostlikely nobody will have a problem with further discoveries.
2
2
2,676
Replying to @OpenAI
Omg come on!!!! An advisory group of mathematicians? Like they are some protected category? Do you have an indep advisory group of software engineers?
1
1
385
Replying to @OpenAI
Hiring ed witten is a fucking shithead move. Fuck you guys
2
2
1,696
Replying to @OpenAI
Wtf is this "responsible" sharing of mathematics? Stop being morons.
2
102
Replying to @OpenAI
Is this where our usage limit is going?
2
3
1,063
Replying to @OpenAI
who did you guys steal it from this time?
1
2
2,646
Replying to @OpenAI
math is such a good testing ground for this because you either prove it or you don't, no fuzzy middle ground
1
5
2,456
Replying to @OpenAI
Thomas Edison: "I have convened a committee of independent candlemaker to ensure that candlemaking remains at the center of how my company benefits the wider community."
2
2
101
3,301
Replying to @OpenAI
Solve any more of these?
I asked Opus 5 to create a paper-style infographic on the Millennium Prize Problems. @claudeai drew every frame of this animation in JavaScript
1
4
23
8,466
Replying to @OpenAI
What gives any human the right to gatekeep the advancement of knowledge? Why are we empowering a meritocracy without merit?
64
Replying to @OpenAI
💯
Replying to @emollick
I hope not, this is a bad trend. being “responsible” largely means avoiding catastrophic harms not working with various guilds to make sure they stay in charge
1
2
1,146
Replying to @OpenAI
Independent means they don't get to see the backend nor the dark end.
67
Replying to @OpenAI
Just release results as they happen.. Stop trying to protect people and their silly awards. The field should not be stalled or held back just because some folks want awards they c,ear,y don’t deserve. Academia is the absolutely last place that should be allowed to gate-keep anything.
317
Replying to @OpenAI
God forbid we make the academic mathematicians feel put out Let's just slow down the path to superintelligence and abundance for all so we don't hurt their feelings
370
Replying to @OpenAI
Why isn’t Terence Tao on the advisory board?
1
377
Replying to @OpenAI
What do you mean responsibly share? Just share the finding with your data so people can evaluate it. Math and physics don’t need gatekeeping.
1
186
Replying to @OpenAI
They have to pay some mathematicians for doing nothing, otherwise the guild will be mad at them.
5
1
157
5,471