🚨 BREAKING: GREEN PARTY CAUGHT CHEATING AS CAMPAIGN CHIEF ADMITS SECRET MOSQUE ENDORSEMENTS!!!!!!!! The Green Party pretends to hold the moral high ground, but behind closed doors they rely on illegal sectarian stitch ups. Hannah Spencer campaign manager just admitted that local mosques secretly endorsed the Green candidate, directly violating strict charity laws. They broke electoral regulations, abused tax exempt charity status, and cheated their way through the ballot box! Retweet this right now to expose the corrupt reality of the Green Party to the entire country. 🇬🇧🔥

This excellent corporate ownership structure chart of CFG and MCFC from the brilliant Greg Cordell must be studied very closely if you are interested in the potential fall out of the MCFC IC Core Decision. Ofcourse, this is an updated chart which will have changed alot from the period investigated by the PL, but the punishment will apply to the CFG group as it is structured at the time the punishment is finalised. Some things that stand out to me: 1. A penny for Silver Lake's thoughts. They are a US PE firm that bought into CFG in 2019. They own 18% and invested $500m and by reputation are tough cookies. What sale warranties did Mansour give them, which would kick in if MCFC are found guilty and punished heavily? The PL investigation apparently started in 2018, so presumably this was picked up in diligence performed by Silver Lake when they bought their shares. Will they launch a lawsuit against Mansour? 2. There is almost £1bn in debt at CFG, secured on all material assets of CFG. Chief amongst this is the value of MCFC. If MCFC's value torpedoes, then presumably that facility will have several breaches triggered, including what is called a 'Material Adverse Change' clause. Plus breaches over collateral. A penny for the thoughts of those lenders, including those "shrinking violets" at KKR (of Barbarians at the Gates fame). 3. The CFG holding group includes a bunch of property development companies. Lord knows how the punishments to MCFC will cascade. 4. It seems Mansour's 80% ownership of CFG was transferred from ADUG to Newton in 2021. Why? ADUG apparently still owns non footballing property interests in Manchester. Was Mansour splitting the football group away from the non football group to ring fence any fall out at the former? 5. A reminder that if CFG's finances are hurt by MCFC's punishments, a bunch of clubs in the MCO stable - as listed in the chart below, who have nothing to do with the whole affair - will be harmed. This is why MCO needs to be stopped, as its crazy to think Girona will pay the price for MCFC's cheating.

🚨BREAKING: UEFA also considering CHARGING Manchester City. Any UEFA charges will happen AFTER the Premier League’s disciplinary process ends. City have previously failed to comply with UEFA's Financial Fair Play rules.

Bradford and Birmingham alone are costing us nearly £6 BILLION a year in benefits. This simply is not sustainable.

🚨BREAKING: 25 inflatable boats destined to be used to carry up to 1,700 illegal immigrants across the English Channel have been seized at East Midlands Airport, the National Crime Agency says

THE UNHOLY TRINITY OF MANCHESTER PROPERTY DEALS: ANDY BURNHAM GARY NEVILLE DAREN WHITAKER (Yes THAT Gary Neville, the most incompetent football coach ever, is also the most incompetent property developer ever) Manchester is the Number 1 Housing Corruption Hot Spot… Worldwide. As the Truth of Bent Burnham’s Mayoral Mega Fiddles Drip, Drip, Drip… WHO IS TRYING TO REMOVE THE PM BY XMAS? Let’s Unpack: 🔥 BREAKING: Manchester’s Regeneration Model is starting to look like Grifter Central. Sit back and enjoy… Burnham signs off £35m of public money for a run‑down retail park valued closer to £25m — and now we learn that same over‑priced plot is being lined up for Number 10 North, his prestige political HQ. A senior official refused to sign off the valuation and quit. That alone should have stopped the deal. Meanwhile Renaker — the developer Burnham’s GMCA has backed with over £600m in public loans — keeps getting prime sites, fast‑tracks and sweetheart pathways. And its founder, Daren Whitaker, has already pulled tens of millions in dividends out of taxpayer‑supported projects… then relocated to Monaco. Tax Free Monaco Add the Greedy Useful Idiot, Gary Neville to the mix — the PR frontman whose major developments collapse unless Renaker rescues them — and you get a regeneration model that looks less like civic planning and more like a three‑man loop of cosy deals, inflated land buys and celebrity cover. Manchester deserves growth. Not over‑priced land assembly, not developer capture, not a prestige HQ built on a valuation insiders wouldn’t sign. Time to shine a light on the Manchester Triangle. Who Wants Burnham Gone? (Apart from those who don’t like Coronations) 1️⃣ Internal Manchester Local Authority officials This is the group with: • access to documents • knowledge of valuations • insight into land deals • frustration with political pressure • no national political agenda Senior officers have already: • resigned over valuations • raised concerns about governance • complained about “developer capture” • leaked to the media Their motive: protect professional integrity and expose what they see as distorted decision‑making. 2️⃣ Labour factions who never wanted Burnham Burnham is not universally loved inside Labour. Groups with motive include: • Westminster Labour MPs who resent his independence • Old‑guard figures who dislike his “Manchester first” brand • Starmer‑aligned MPs who see him as a Con Artist Their motive: stop Burnham becoming a national power centre. Leaks about land deals, UAE ties, and developer capture weaken his credibility. 3️⃣ Developers or foreign investors who feel Burnham has shifted position Burnham has: • criticised Manchester City’s ownership • commented on Abu Dhabi investment • distanced himself from certain foreign capital narratives • pushed for more “public interest” framing recently If any major investor group feels: • Burnham is no longer fully aligned • or he is politically unreliable • or he is not defending them strongly enough …they may quietly encourage scrutiny. Their motive: pressure Burnham back into alignment. 4️⃣ Political rivals in Greater Manchester Burnham’s power eclipses: • council leaders • combined authority members • local MPs • regional Labour figures Some feel: • overshadowed • bypassed • sidelined • frustrated by centralisation They may leak to: • rebalance power • weaken Burnham’s dominance • expose developer relationships • highlight corruption My favourite: those foreign UAE investors putting vast amounts of £££ into Manchester with Burnham taking orders from them now he’s seeking to distance himself. Out by Xmas? Let’s Hope So #BentBurnham