Alleged "pro-Israel Elon bot" Justice for Cora, Dawson and Callan Suspected to be "an op of some kind"

Replying to @sciencegirl
Math teacher here, let me take a stab at explaining what the Chinese girl did in a non-algebra way. First, observe that 97 and 94 are close to 100, so the product must be slightly less than 100x100 =10,000. Second, in general, you can think of multiplication as a grid of points. For example, you can find 3x6 as a grid with 3 points in each row and 6 points in each column (or vice versa). If you count all the points, you get 18, which is the product. Now imagine you are drawing such a grid for the problem in the video. The grid would be 97 points wide and 94 points high. You could actually solve the problem this way, but that would take a long time. So instead, compare it to the 100 x 100 grid which you already know has 10,000 points. Compared to the 100 x 100, it is 3 points less wide. So subtract 300 from 10,000 = 9,700 left. (Imagine you are physically crossing off 300 points from the left side of the grid.) The 97 x 94 is also 6 points shorter. So subtract another 600 = 9,100 left. Again, imagine you are physically crossing off 600 points from the top of the grid. How here's the most tricky part: you actually subtracted too much, because when you subtracted the 300 and the 600, you crossed off some of them twice: the points where the top strip and left strip intersect, at the top left. To compensate for the over-subtraction, you need to add those back. How many to add? the intersected area is 3x6, or 18. 9100+18 = 9118. I hope this helps somebody. 😁
52
7
487
163,592
RT @MarkSimoneNY: ICE has fired at people 3 times. That is out of 1.3 million engagements. That means they only used their weapons 0.0002…
635
human folly knows no bounds. 😑
What we know: 1. She's a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest advocates for opening up migration to North African peoples. 2. She owns a small chic boutique in an upscale spot, she stood in her shop trying to save it from looting and theft telling them that she's a famous activist. 3. She told them I'm so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I'm with you, I've defended you and your entry and stay in France, they spat on her, knocked her down, and trampled her with their feet, good thing she's still alive. 4. And they looted the whole shop, losing all the struggle and work of her lifetime in a moment. Standing there stunned, not believing that these thieving, rabble-rousing, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she's spent her whole life defending, and advocating for them to invade her country and destroy it
Community note
La mujer de la fotografía es una manifestante que intenta impedir el saqueo del establecimiento. Ella no es la propietaria. Es un supermercado de la cadena Franpix. En el vídeo completo de puede ver. instagram.com/reel/DenbGUyid
20
redpilledteacher retweeted
Obama knew Hillary Clinton’s plan was to falsely tie Donald Trump to Russia in 2016, he greenlit the hoax despite knowing it was a lie. Here are then CIA Director John Brennan’s own notes proving it: “Cite alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on 26 July of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference from the Russian security services.” Obama (POTUS): “Any evidence of collaboration between Trump campaign & Russia”
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
409
6,301
19,655
178,595
redpilledteacher retweeted
Barack Obama posted on Sunday morning a long defense of Ilhan Omar that ignores the actual evidence in her case and pretends the investigation is pure political retribution. This is the same Obama whose administration pushed the Russia hoax and spied on Trump’s campaign. Now he’s lecturing everyone about selective targeting. Obama calls Omar a “law-abiding elected official” and claims the raid and probe rest on an “unsubstantiated theory” with a “nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago.” He says the full weight of the federal government is coming down on her solely because she criticized Trump. Nowhere does he say Omar is innocent. The search warrant listed potential charges of conspiracy, immigration fraud, and false statements. Agents seized her phone, computers, notebooks, and passport. Investigators are looking at whether she or her father misstated her birth date so she could claim derivative citizenship as a minor. Records have listed her birth year as both 1981 and 1982. That’s a real discrepancy with real consequences, not a theory invented last week. Obama also defends James Comey and Letitia James as if the cases against them had no basis. Comey was indicted on charges of threatening the president and transmitting a threat after he posted a photo of seashells arranged as “86 47.” Prosecutors argued a reasonable person would read it as a threat to kill Trump. James was charged with bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution over a Virginia mortgage she obtained by claiming a property as her secondary residence. Those are specific charges based on documents and statements, not vibes. In every case Obama treats the existence of an investigation as proof of abuse. He never engages with the records, the warrants, or the charges. He just writes a longer version of the same line every Democrat has used: make Omar look sympathetic, refuse to acknowledge any legitimacy to the inquiry, and carefully avoid saying she did nothing wrong. The silence on actual innocence is the point. Real evidence exists. Pretending otherwise is the hypocrisy.
200
1,101
3,455
51,017
redpilledteacher retweeted
46
1,913
33,267
247,495
What a banger of a post, exactly dead right. The DATA, not rhetoric or even common sense, but DATA, shows why it is INSANE to allow transgenders in women's prisons. This post is a good example of why I continue to follow Diana even though I disagree with her about probably 80% of political issues. Not everyone falls neatly into one of two camps; I would actually include myself in that respect.
I just want to remind everyone that 88% of trans inmates in Canada are sex offenders. Only 11% of Canada’s non-trans male inmates are sex offenders, by the way, so we’re talking about a group of men who are literally 8x more likely to be sex offenders than the general male prison population. That’s who the Canadian government has decided to put in cells with some of the country’s most vulnerable women. If you think that this predilection for sexual offending doesn’t also carry over to the non-incarcerated trans population, I’m afraid I’m going to have to ask you to put down the crack pipe, because only a crackhead could seriously believe that. Trans-identifying men are paraphiliacs, and paraphiliacs are some of the most dangerous men on the planet. Studies have found a 20% rate of transvestism in sexually sadistic criminals, and a 40% rate of transvestism in sexually sadistic murderers. One study found the rate of transvestism in sexually motivated killers to be as high as 54%, and everyone reputable who has seriously studied the subject has found a high frequency of genital and gender dysphoria in the perpetrators of sexually motivated violence, with an even higher frequency among sexually motivated murderers. In short, these men are dangerous, and the ones who are incarcerated are the absolute last people who should ever be locked in cells with women.
1
35
redpilledteacher retweeted
Americans aren’t falling for the mainstream media narrative, they know what’s happening in Europe aren’t “student protests” “Mainstream media is trying to convince everybody that what's happening in France right now is about education — My opinion is that there is a massive alliance that's going on between Islam and communists around the world, and that they are mobilizing the United Nations and around 1,000 NGOs to facilitate this invasion “My opinion is that they could not convince white people to destroy their own homes, so they brought in foreign invaders to do it for them” “My opinion is that globalism needs to be completely dissolved, from the United Nations to the WEF to the G7 and everything in between. Government is supposed to be a representation of their people, not foreign invaders, and not foreign entities that control them. In America, we watched the exact same thing go down. I used to have some leftist friends that lived in Los Angeles, right in downtown LA. They went to the protest thinking that they were a protest, and what they noticed is that pallets of bricks Pallets of 2x4s and pallets of pipes were dropped off in the middle of the protest. That conversation I had with my friends is what originally got me into looking into Democracy Alliance and all of the other NGOs like WelcomeUS who are involved in facilitating the invasion. I believe this is an attempt of coup to take down the West. But the thing is, is if they take down the West, they're taking down the whole ****** world” “They are burning down 150 year old historic buildings. Do you really think that's about education? They are looting a bunch of stores. I've already seen pallets of pipes being dropped off in the streets as well. This is so ****** embarrassing that we could sit back and allow this sh* to happen to our countries. First the traitors and then the invaders” Not everyone is falling for it. Americans aren’t dumb enough to see an entire city of rioters waiving Islam flags and think that’s anything other than a takeover There needs to be the most severe punishments possible for the people funding this and the politicians who are facilitating this whole thing
378
3,833
9,062
85,404
>Satan, who has reportedly retired from corrupting France because the competition has become unbearable. This is brilliant. OMG. What an underrated post. 😂
WHO DESTROYED FRANCE? 🇫🇷 Yes. EVERYONE did. 1. Emmanuel Macron, a man who thinks he's Jupiter but governs like a McKinsey intern who accidentally became emperor. He promised a French Renaissance and delivered a complete disaster. His solution to every catastrophe is another speech about the future of Europe. 2. The ENA Elite, Sciences Po, and the Grandes Écoles, the world's most sophisticated factories for producing highly educated incompetence. They can explain the collapse of French industry in seventeen PowerPoint presentations without ever having entered a factory. They invented a system where the same people run the state, destroy it, and then get promoted to investigate what went wrong. 3. François Hollande, the socialist who declared war on finance and then appointed Emmanuel Macron economy minister. His presidency was so spectacularly mediocre that even his own party eventually pretended not to know him. He managed to make political paralysis look like an exhausting full-time occupation. 4. Jacques Chirac, who promised reform, encountered a demonstration, and immediately discovered the virtues of doing absolutely nothing. He spent twelve years as president shaking hands with farmers while the national debt continued its agricultural expansion. His greatest political achievement was making immobility look presidential. 5. François Mitterrand, who tried socialism in 1981, and discovered economic reality in 1983. He nationalized companies, reversed course, and built a pyramid at the Louvre. Appropriate architecture for a president who occasionally treated the French economy like a pharaoh's burial chamber. 6. The Socialist Left, which believes money grows on government decrees. Their economic model consists of taxing the rich, subsidizing the poor, employing the middle class in public administration, and borrowing whatever remains. When the money runs out, they accuse arithmetic of being fascist. 7. The French Trade Unions, which defend public services by making sure nobody can use them. They stop trains to save the railways, close schools to defend education, and block refineries to protect purchasing power. Their greatest contribution to French productivity is ensuring that nobody produces anything without their permission. 8. The French Right, which has spent forty years promising to reduce public expenditure, reform the state, restore authority, and liberate the economy. Then it wins an election, appoints seventeen ministers, creates four administrative agencies, and discovers that cutting public expenditure might upset somebody. French conservatives defend free enterprise in speeches and administrative regulation in practice. They want a smaller state, provided nobody removes their subsidies, pensions, privileges, public contracts, or favorite government department. Their economic program was essentially socialism with better tailoring. 9. The French Boomers, who inherited affordable housing, expanding industries, and economic growth, then converted everything into pensions and real estate. They bought apartments for the price of a used Peugeot and now explain to young people that homeownership requires sacrifice. They spent their youth demanding revolution and their retirement demanding that absolutely nothing change. 10. Pétain and Vichy, who responded to the greatest military humiliation in modern French history by deciding that collaboration with the occupier was an excellent national recovery strategy. France had already lost the war. Pétain somehow found a way to make losing considerably more embarrassing. 11. The French Generals of 1940, who built the Maginot Line and apparently forgot to tell the Germans they were supposed to attack it. They prepared brilliantly for the First World War, only to discover that the enemy had inconveniently arrived in the Second. 12. The Republican Idealists, who believe France isn't a country but a philosophical concept. Other nations build institutions. France proclaims Values. When schools fail, they organize republican ceremonies. When public order collapses, they deliver speeches about citizenship. When reality contradicts their principles, reality is clearly insufficiently republican. 13. Saint-Simon, Fourier, Cabet, and the French Utopian Socialists, who looked at humanity and decided the problem was insufficient central planning. Fourier imagined communities organized around human passions. Saint-Simon dreamed of society directed by enlightened productive elites. Their descendants now occupy French ministries, designing national happiness through administrative circulars. Two centuries later, the happiness is still missing, but the paperwork is magnificent. 14. The French Revolution, which promised Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, then introduced mass executions, revolutionary tribunals, civil war, and political terror. The revolutionaries liberated France from monarchy, discovered that citizens disagreed about liberty, and began executing one another. France has spent two centuries celebrating this as the birth of political enlightenment. Apparently, mass killing becomes progressive when accompanied by the correct slogans. 15. The Enlightenment, Libertinism, and the Marquis de Sade, who began by liberating humanity from superstition and ended by demonstrating that intellectual sophistication is no guarantee against moral insanity. Voltaire mocked religious authority, Rousseau dreamed of remaking society, and Sade turned transgression into an entire literary industry. Their descendants now believe that every inherited institution is oppressive and every new social experiment is automatically progress. 16. The English, who spent centuries sabotaging French ambitions, financing France's enemies, and preventing French domination of Europe. The Hundred Years' War was essentially a prolonged British property dispute conducted on French territory. Every time France attempted to become a continental superpower, England appeared with a navy, a coalition, and a remarkably enthusiastic willingness to pay somebody else to fight. 17. The Habsburgs, who surrounded France with territories acquired through marriage, inheritance, and a family tree resembling a biological experiment conducted without ethical supervision. They conquered half of Europe through weddings while French kings bankrupted themselves trying to escape the encirclement. The Habsburgs invented geopolitical domination through matrimonial administration. 18. The English, Again, because centuries of warfare were apparently insufficient. After defeating Napoleon, they conquered global commerce, international finance, and eventually the English language conquered French business. Today, French executives speak English to other French executives in Paris. England finally conquered France without deploying a single soldier. 19. The Romans, who conquered Gaul, introduced taxation, centralized administration, and the idea that provincial populations should be governed by distant officials convinced of their intellectual superiority. Two thousand years later, Paris continues to administer France like a Roman governor collecting taxes from barbarians. Rome collapsed. French bureaucracy survived. Live like Rome, die like Rome. 20. Darth Vader, the ultimate French technocrat. He believed every problem could be solved through centralization, intimidation, and an enormous publicly funded megaproject. His Death Star was essentially the French Ministry of Finance equipped with a superlaser. It cost a fortune, concentrated all power in one place, and exploded because nobody listened to the engineers. 21. Saruman and Sauron, the spiritual ancestors of French industrial planning and European centralization. Saruman wanted to replace forests with factories. Sauron wanted to unite the continent under one supreme administrative authority. Both believed that enough central planning could overcome reality. Both were eventually defeated by small provincial creatures who refused to follow instructions. 22. Satan, who has reportedly retired from corrupting France because the competition has become unbearable. He spent centuries encouraging pride, vanity, envy, and destructive political passions, only to discover that French politicians could produce the same results without supernatural assistance. He applied for a position at the Ministry of Finance but was rejected for insufficient administrative experience. And the French people? They have spent more than two centuries overthrowing kings, emperors, republics, governments, and presidents, convinced that the next political arrangement would finally solve everything. They have tried absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, revolutionary dictatorship, empire, parliamentary republics, presidential republicanism, socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and technocracy. Every generation announces that France needs a revolution. Every revolution promises to put an end to the failures of the previous regime. And every new regime eventually discovers that it has inherited THE FRENCH.
19
>You are not going to seize power by changing women's minds. You must change women's minds by seizing power. This is exactly right. To put it in a slightly gentler way, you need to create a system that incentivizes women to be patriotic and pro-Western.
No, she does not realize anything. No, she will not realize anything. No, she will not change her belief system. Because she has none. Only high-testosterone, high-IQ heterosexual males speak and act as a result of their mental model of the system as a whole. Everyone else just says and does whatever they think will keep them safe, and maybe get them a pat on the head. Her mental model is not "Diversity is good for France." Her mental model is "if I say diversity is good for France, others will approve of me". If you have enough voters who believe things simply because others believe them, democracy becomes irrelevant. Actual opinion no longer matters, only the illusion of consensus. Because the people who are swayed by the illusion of consensus become the swing voters, and everyone who actually needs to be reasoned with becomes irrelevant. That's what women's suffrage is really for. That's what immigration is really for. That's what government school systems are for. They are all for generating a critical mass of voters whose opinions are formed outside their heads. That's why the entire Western political class appears to hate high-T hetero White men suddenly and all at once. Western high-T hetero White men are the demographic that advances civilization at all, but they are also the greatest impediment to managerial rule. And guess which one the political class actually cares about. So, no, women are not going to suddenly wake up and reverse course. You are not going to seize power by changing women's minds. You must change women's minds by seizing power.
1
29
The reaction of white women to the Cornell 7 case, compared to cases like the ones mentioned in this post, or the Rotherham rape gangs scandal in the UK, is absolutely infuriating. The kindest explanation is that they simply don't know about those cases because they have only heard the media narratives. The unkind explanation is that they subconsciously have decided Western men are weak, and chosen rapey barbarians instead. It pains me to say it but from an evolutionary biological perspective, if that latter explanation is the more nearly correct one, it may partially be justified. It might actually be the case that Western men have been weakened by civilization and prior warfare (more violent men removed from the gene pool) to a degree that now endangers the survival of the white European genome. That genome may well be on its way out--nature doesn't care about your feelings or culture, it only cares about reproductive success. The problem is that, along this possibly fatal weakness, those genomes carry a phenomenal capacity for invention, organization and creativity, which could well be lost along with the weakness. The last time something remotely similar happened (the fall of the Roman empire) the result was 1000 years of incredible barbarism and cultural regression. Talk about a blackpill. 😑
I’m going to let you in on a secret about rape that I learned while bouncing at 3 nightclubs concurrently for my entire undergrad. 500 nights at the club dealing with women and creeps have produced some insight. The first thing to understand is that 99% of date-rape cases are just patently false. Every weekend like clockwork a new tiny girl who hadn’t eaten all day would confidently down 5 shots of tequila then claim she was drugged once word got around that she shit herself in a cab, or fell asleep in a dumpster. I’ve lost count of how many of them were perplexed to report that their drug tests came back clean the next morning. BUT… In my 500 nights of service, I witnessed it happen for real, bill cosby style, twice. And in 100% of those cases it was a black or an Indian guy. The first was a guy named Sohil who had actually openly made some suspect remarks to people I knew. Why was nothing done? Because the concept was so completely alien to the white guys around him that they simply didn’t believe what they were hearing. It was exactly like the scene from American Psycho where he talks about a girls head on a stick as though it’s the punchline to a joke, and his friends just exchange a weird look and carry on. That’s how crazy the prospect of rape sounds to white guys, he might as well have said he had a head in his freezer. Ultimately, Sohil was caught trying to sneak into a drugged girl’s bedroom window after her roommates had shuttled her home for the night. He was sentenced to 2 years in prison. There was no international outrage, no big news articles, nothing. Just a post on Facebook shared between the bar staff. The second was a black guy from Martinique. He was a charming niggardly character who hung around the bars every weekend bumming cigarettes or making a few bucks selling fake cocaine. He lived in someone’s walk-in closet for $300 a month. He had rumours circulating about his predation, but nobody had anything concrete until he was finally caught inappropriately touching an incapacitated girl and force feeding her drugs. He was quickly and brutally sentenced to a swift release and a mild scolding from a social worker. He had successfully argued to the judge that people would kill him if he were sent back to Martinique, and was therefore let off with not even a slap on the wrist. The funniest part of this whole ordeal is that we have reason to suspect that he was a refugee in the first place because he had raped the wrong guy’s sister back home. You genuinely can’t make this shit up. Word got around to the bars, but this was back in the day. We didn’t have ID scanners, and hiring was a revolving door. Every Fortnite we’d have a new roster of Dianabol enthusiasts standing at the entrance letting groups of bombshells skip the line. It was impossible to entirely keep people out. And so within 2 months it happened again. Exactly the same as last time. And the black guy hit the judge with the exact same excuse. Luckily the judge finally came to his senses, and sent him back to a third world shithole. He has lived in Paris France ever since. I tell these stories because I’m at my whits end with headlines like the one I see below. At this point we’re so used to being gaslit that the omission of a description is as good as a 4K portrait. So I’ll do my small part to set record straight. It is never the white men.
2
87
Translation: the Communists are attempting to use their migrant weapons to seize power.
From the high schools of France to the streets of Madrid to the universities of Tirana, young people are telling their governments the same thing: in an age of massive wealth inequality, they want a future they can believe in. In France, students and teachers are asking for safe schools, enough teachers and smaller classes. In Spain, for affordable rent and housing. In Albania, for good jobs and an end to corruption. @JDVance says this is what happens when a nation lets in too many immigrants from the global south. He is not just morally wrong, but misreading the moment. The is what happens when nations let wealth and power accumulate in the hands of a few. This is what happens when young people lose hope in their future. In America, let us listen to our young. We need an economic and political transformation. America's Next New Deal.
1
17
This is not a bad idea at all.
Hear me out: Spencer Pratt as Press Secretary.
1
24
redpilledteacher retweeted
There is no Right. There is just “not the Left.” Being on the Right today is the same as being a Protestant in the 16th century: No one agrees on anything, they just know they’re not Catholic.
334
1,718
24,232
465,425
Oh yes Jimbo. We should definitely have mobs of thousands of Third Worlders burning down our cities. Great idea. 🙄
Democrat Nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas James Talarico says America should look “to other countries, especially in Western Europe, for inspiration” on how we can be a better country.
13
redpilledteacher retweeted
Real photo from a pilot’s cockpit. How has it come to this?
Community note
openai.com/research/verif… AI GENERATED IMAG
2,203
12,625
72,551
1,900,659
redpilledteacher retweeted
🚨🚨 WATCH: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange tells Megyn Kelly that the reason his organization has never released any damaging materials on President Trump is that “There is no dirt to release on Donald Trump.” He is probably the most squeaky clean individual in Washington because he is not a career politician or a product of the globalist cabal of elites. Julian Assange is a hero for EXPOSING to the world THE TRUTH about Hillary Clinton and saving us from her planned destruction of America and the world order as we know it. Trump is the greatest existential threat to the globalist uni-party cabal… They have absolutely nothing on him and he has everything on them. In other words, he has “all the cards” to checkmate the Deep State. God Bless Julian Assange, a years-long former political prisoner, and Thank God he is finally free at last.
44
935
2,243
33,739
The difference between Communism and capitalism In capitalism, genius innovators like Elon Musk can be highly rewarded, whereas leftist gutter vermin like Noah Khrachvik are mostly treated as the waste of space that they actually are In Communism, the leftist gutter vermin like Noah Khrachvik are running the country and they will shoot you in the head if you complain about it Communism: not even once
The difference between Communism and capitalism Communism: real development, utility, something useful - an advance for society Capitalism: some spoiled brat made something useless using billions of dollars while people starve on the streets
1
2
22
redpilledteacher retweeted
May, 2016. CNN does a segment entitled "A Day with ICE in a so-called Sanctuary City." CNN literally rode around with ICE from the break of dawn until nighttime, watching while ICE conducted raids and arrested illegals. ICE arrested some right at their jobs. CNN was not criticizing ICE. They were celebrating ICE. It was "exclusive access" during the Obama years and CNN considered it a privilege to get to watch ICE work. ICE even made a "mistake" arrest. CNN had no problem with it. Six months later Trump won the election and ICE was then labeled the gestapo.
18
1,187
2,064
18,823
I've been saying for years that Klobuchar was dirty. There were rumors in the late 2010s that her family was involved in some kind of stolen weapons scandal. Now she's mixed up in the Somali corruption.
Senator Amy Klobuchar has been quietly preparing her staff for her exit from politics after a direct link between her, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, and the Somali "refugees" who stole billions from Medicaid was uncovered. Sources say Klobuchar is expecting that both she and Omar will have to resign and that there's a distinct possibility of both state and federal charges. The investigation that was started by citizen journalist Nick Shirley has grown into one of the most explosive political scandals in a decade. What's your response to this......??👀 MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON X. LET’S GO 👏
15
redpilledteacher retweeted
Annabel Richter was a 19 year old FIT student. She was fed fentanyl by a man named Moises Friere who told her it was cocaine. Friere knew what he was doing — he gave the drugs to two female students and didn’t take any himself. While Annabel was overdosing, Friere stripped off her clothes, took photos of her naked body, and then raped her instead of calling for help. Because of what he did, she is dead. There are no “I am Jane Doe” rallies for Annabel Richter. There is no daily coverage of her death on CNN. There are no New York Times investigations creating timelines of her last day. Unless you read local crime news in New York City, you will not have heard about this case. Why is Cornell’s Jane Doe of so much more interest to mainstream news than FIT’s Annabel Richter? Perhaps because news loves to create narratives about predatory white male college students and refuses to make national-news villains of men like Friere, who commit most of the actual crime in places like New York City. The NYT and CNN aren’t lying when they do 50 stories about Jane Doe and zero about Annabel Richter. They’re just exercising editorial judgment about which parts of the news you need to hear.
Man who drugged and raped dead NYC college student texted nude pics of her instead of calling 911: feds trib.al/pAEqBDj
347
3,858
19,759
1,042,220