Socialist. Sysadmin. Dirtbag Commie. Antifascist. Vim user. D&D enthusiast. Bad at painting tabletop miniatures. 𝕙𝕖/π•™π•šπ•ž

πŸ¦‹ @reset.select
If I replied to you and then blocked you, it’s because I don’t respect you and reading your reply would be a waste of my time. I’m not talking to you. I’m talking over you.
23
5
72
23,980
This reminds me of that one week on Twitter when my feed became a all like β€œremember Jack Black, and how funny he was in all the movies?” only for it to culminate in him dropping the Tenacious D NFT.
I actually forgot there's a chapter in Rework call "Pick a fight" this explains why @DHH has been so insufferable lately: Marketing
1
44
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
I am now full doomerβ€”not because chatbots are going to become β€œsuperintelligent,” but because we bet the entire economy on the absurd science fiction story that they will. We are a deeply stupid species. What do you notice about the other industries? PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE. All of those β€œbubbles” left infrastructure that added to GDP over many decades. Before you say β€œdata centers,” the vast majority of the cost is in GPUsβ€”which begin depreciating rapidly after 2-3 years. Data centers aren’t railroad tracks; they are temporary money furnaces. I don’t know how we get out of this without a great depression. It’s the most absurd mass psychosis in human history.
54
351
954
28,767
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
Pretty much the blatant contradiction in those who defend capitalism.
241
49
474
11,882
β€œwithout prompting” open the article: β€œwe prompted the AI to access the data on systems they didn’t have access to and gave them full access to find and install hacking tools” Every Tweet about AI on this site is either science fiction world building or a blatant lie.
πŸ‘€ OpenAI’s A.I. Tried to Breach 4 Other Targets, Without Prompting nytimes.com/2026/09/23/techn…
1
13
54
659
I know dude is trolling for attention but this statement is not as inflammatory as he wishes it was. Some of the LLMs are pretty good at finding boring low level bugs that require meticulous pattern matching and are easy to miss. This is actually a good use of the technology.
It'll soon be seen as deeply irresponsible to have critical code reviewed by human eyes alone.
3
1
21
350
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
People like me with decades jn the field PHD, papers that changed policy, shipped products, etc are the ones who don’t have a clue about it folks. The pundits citing l”thousands of leas-wrong posts” as evidence on the other hand are experts πŸ˜‚
Replying to @timnitGebru
The problem is that people like you, who obviously have no clue about AI and what this technology can do or how it works, shape part of the global discourse, thus distracting from the main problem for humanity, which is AGI/ASI control/alignment.
6
28
180
6,475
Seems short sighted. Who will prompt the LLMs once all the people who knew how to program and design systems retire and there is no one to replace them. Serious answers only, don’t tell me about your faith based singularity religion.
I completely agree with @dhh. Funny enough, I also wrote code (c++) for 25 years. I also enjoyed it tremendously, but I stopped in January 2026. I have no regrets. Face reality people, and embrace the future.
2
5
264
The notion that in the very near future software will build and maintain itself with zero human supervision, and no one will ever need to learn or know anything about computers seems childish.
1
4
63
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
27
296
1,095
9,370
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
It's...... a style guide. It's entire purpose is to police language.
The whole "don't anthropomorphize AI" thing is very Woke 1.0. People trying to police language that is perfectly natural in some cases and ending up in a web of contradictions.
9
103
3,413
64,689
π•Šπ• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•šπ•€π•₯ π•Šπ•ͺπ•€π•’π••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ πŸ’Ύ retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Trump’s DOJ says anti-data center protestors could face FIVE YEARS in prison.
8
1,354
13,091
94,553
When CEOs say shit like this, they mean this for YOUR kids only. They themselves are absolutely sending their own kids and grandkids to Harvard.
JUST IN: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang declares children won't need to learn basic math skills in the AI era.
4
26
209
Saying β€œthis thing you believe in is science fiction” is not an ad-hominem but a rational statement of fact. AI boosterism is completely faith based and unmoored from any semblance of material reality.
No matter what you say on here about AI, the responses generally fall into one of two categories. Either: β€’ β€œIt’s just a next token predictor!” or β€’ β€œThe singularity is near!” And responses are usually accompanied by ad hominem attacks. The emotional reactivity is striking.
6
119
Sorry, apparently police abolitionism is cancelled due to the lesbian bar incidentπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I really don’t follow the logic here: we can’t address wealth inequality as the root cause of crime & eliminate the need for armed property protectors b/c then I’d have to spy on my neighbors?
On some level, abolition is a vision of the world not without police, but where everyone is asked to be police, all the time. Your time constantly occupied with monitoring your neighbors, β€œholding them accountable,” counseling them, β€œeducating” them, shaming them, and punishing them. I’m not interested in that work or in that world. I do not think the best vision of life is where we’re all constantly enmeshed that deeply in an interminable act of mutual β€œaccountability.” Most of the time, I want to leave my neighbors alone; I want them to leave me alone. I want to have a place that is a refuge from β€œthe community,” because β€œthe community” is often (usually?) just the self-appointed individuals who claim to speak on its behalf, and who have the sociopathic ambitions required to defeat other challengers and scare off dissent. In other words, while capitalist atomization has robbed us of many positive social bonds, it has in fact liberated us from many negative ones. The work of a socialist project should certainly involve trying to revive or renew positive sociality, but I do not actually want to return to the β€œcommunity” dynamics of a medieval peasant village, or a nomadic band on the steppe. I would like *some* measure of privacy and autonomy, and I do not want to be police. I do not want to live under the totalitarian thumb of β€œthe community” any more than I want to live under the totalitarian thumb of capital. And so I am not an abolitionist, because that is what abolition actually offers.
1
5
132
Corporation: nobody wants to work anymore Worker: are you hiring? Corporation: lol, no … Worker: but you have job listings… Corporation: we use those to defraud investors
you won't get a job with a humanities degree. you also won't get one with a science degree. also, you won't get one with any other degree. but you also won't get one without any degree
1
5
69
I can field this one: - America has no general purpose government issued photo ID. You can get a passport, but it takes time, is expensive and most people don’t need it - There is a well documented history of states using voter ID laws to suppress votes of minority groups
This is one of the most puzzling things to me about American politics. Why is showing ID for voting controversial?
1
4
19
483
Most commonly used form of photo id in US is state issued drivers license, but it is not a proof of citizenship (just proof of residence)
2
1
88
If you’re wondering why US does not mandate free federal photo ids, it goes back to states rights. The states that want voter ID laws are usually categorically opposed to government ID mandates (specifically because they view voter id as a useful vote suppression tool)
3
55
Thus far m, AI provided 0 cures for cancer. The claim that it will, is at this point pure science fiction. It’s like saying New York Mets will win the Super Bowl. Currently, they don’t even play the correct sport, but in theory, if they switched over, maybe it could happen.
It’s sad to think that there are kids out there with leukemia whose lives could be saved by new technology, and hysterical pearl-clutching doomers like this guy are out there sandbagging the effort in exchange for some cheap attention instead of just going to therapy Pathetic
5
50
633